$1.5M seems appropriate for an MVP, especially relative to the size of the treasury that UNI token holders are entrusted with allocating.
More details and an explanation of the methodology that got us here are live on Discourse, and we are polling consensus before putting this to a governance vote — as soon as next week!
Where a network is sufficiently similar to a cooperative, its possible a team can launch a token and decentralize ownership, while continuing to lead their project—without fear of violating securities regulations.
IANAL and this post does not provide a comprehensive legal analysis.
We are flagging this argument for further consideration in the hopes that crypto teams will consider them with their own counsel :)
In crypto, user-ownership can help drive network growth faster than any Web 2 growth hacking tricks
But nailing an effective ownership distribution is one the biggest challenges (and opportunities) for teams.
Best practices remain murky.
Can we fix that? Thread 👇
Taking a step back, figuring out ownership distribution is an exercise in Mechanism Design:
"a field in economics and game theory that takes an objectives-first approach to designing economic mechanisms or incentives, toward desired objectives..."
+ A detail oriented self-starter, intellectually curious, with strong analytical and communication skills
+ Thrive off of new ideas and excited to push our thinking
+ Have a technical background or a demonstrated ability in data-driven analysis
+ Are excited to design and track the metrics that are most critical to understanding and forecasting the progress of important crypto and Ownership Economy projects.