Its #IPThursday again good people! This was one also requested a lot. Its the story of how the Polo you wear in South Africa is fake. Well maybe fake is harsh..... just not from the original company.
Meet Ralph, Ralph Lifshitz, or as we have come to know him, Ralph Lauren. Ralph was born and raised New York City, the youngest of 4 kids and your typical last born.
In his college years, Ralph pursued a career in business but he dropped out after two years, something only a last born would dare try to do.
Anyways, after a short stint in the US army, he decided to pursue a career in Sales, clothing sales to be specific. He got a job at a clothing company called Beau Brummell. It was here where hw found his passion....making clothes.
Sidenote: Imagine telling your African parent you’re dropping out of school to go make clothes....as a guy. 😭😭😭😭😭
In 1968, at the age of 28, Ralph convinced the president of the company he was working for to let him start his own line of clothing. And so he did! Soon after, the Ralph Lauren Corporation was born.
He created his own Men’s line of clothing in the same year. He had a huge interest in sport and so decided to name his clothing line after a sport....”Polo”. He also released the signature Polo shirt, which has the Polo player logo on the chest. All this will be NB later.
Within a few years, his brand grew and he started making Polo clothing for women, fragrance and cologne. It is now one of the most recognisable brands in the world. It is mainly for the rich and people that wear Polo will never not mention it....well in South Africa at least.
The Polo brand is very famous in South Africa. It arguably the most famous of all “high-end” brands. However, Ralph Lauren does not trade in South Africa. Yea blew my mind too!
To understand how this happened we need to go back to the 70s, when Ralph Lauren was still growing the Polo brand. This was during the height of apartheid and South Africa was under trade sanctions. There were boycotts from all angles!
Many SA businesses decided to take advantage of this. If the famous brands weren’t going to set up shop in SA, they would do that themselves. Remember how George Sombonos stole the McDonalds trade marks? Well exactly like that!
A company known as the LA Group decided to start selling Polo branded clothing in 1979. They didn’t just steal it like Sombonos did with McDonald’s though, but they got into an agreement with Ralph Lauren.
The agreement said that they could use the Polo trade marks but under one condition....The man on the Polo SA logo had to face the other way. Yes! The Original Ralph Lauren Polo faces left, while the SA knock-off faces right....You might just wanna check your Polo shirts folks👀.
Anyways, this arrangement worked well during apartheid and when Ralph Lauren was still an upcoming brand. However, things changed after 1994. For starters, apartheid has ended and today, Ralph Lauren is one of the biggest brands in the world, valued at billions of dollars.
As I’m sure we all know, SA is a big market for international brands and why not, if you’ve ever watched “I blew it”, you know that this country has a wild spending culture! 😂😂😂 Anyways, this is to say that Ralph Lauren wanted back in the SA market.
But they couldn’t, because Polo SA had registered trade marks for the name and logo in SA. If ever Ralph Lauren tried to enter the SA market, they would be hit by a lawsuit quicker than you you can say Polo.
Ralph Lauren tried to do what McDonald’s had done in 1996, argue that they are well known and they should be allowed to setup shop in SA. This didn’t work, I think the agreement they had didn’t help their case. This is why you shouldn’t just sign anything kids.
Since then, Ralph Lauren has been looking at ways of sneaking into the SA market, which brings us to our actual dispute. One which they were not actually part of but may have benefited the most.
Its #IPThursday again good people! This week we go through the story of how two brothers “stole” some trade marks belonging to Apple Inc. This is all about the little ways of exploiting trade mark law.
If you’re familiar with these threads, you know we start from the very beginning. The year is 1976, in a garage somewhere in a California surbub, three men Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne.
The three tech geeks wanted to create a computer. Wozniak or Woz, as they called him was slightly ahead of the curve. He hand-built the first computer, the Apple 1. So in order to fund this project, they all committed to selling some personal assets.
Welcome to another edition of #IPThursday. Its part 3 and last of the Cola Wars. This one is really something out of a heist movie. It involved the theft of IP, an FBI agent and a criminal case. At its core, this is a lesson of what can happen if you expose trade secrets.
Lets pick it up from the beginning again. In 1886, a man named John Pemberton blended syrup with carbonated water, coca, other extracts and even cocaine to make what we know now as Coca-Cola.
He went through some tough times financially, so just two years later he sold the recipe to Asa Candler for about $2k. Candler started distributing the drink throughout the US, and the rest is history!
Its #IPThursday again good people. I know it came late, sorry for the wait! This week I decided to continue with the Cola Wars, so think of this as part 2 of Coke V Pepsi. This week, the question is whether you can have a trade mark in the shape of a bottle.
Lets start with a quick recap from last week shall we? Coca-cola had established itself as the leading soft drink manufacturer in the world.
Despite their success and dominance over the 19th century, Coke began to face competition from Pepsi over the decades. Leading to the Cola Wars. Pepsi Cola grew in popularity through intensive marketing, while at the same time Coke grew to become a truly global brand.
Another week, another #IPThursday good people! We’ve all heard of the “Cola Wars” and this week I’ll be going through this war but with a twist (literally). Its Coke v Pepsi in TWIST trade mark case.
Our story begins sometime during the Battle of Columbus around 1865. US military member John Pemberton sustained a battle wound which left him in a fair bit of pain.
To ease the pain, he started using morphine, which he quickly became addicted to. In fact he became so addicted to the stuff he decided to look for alternatives that were “morphine free”.
Welcome to another edition of #IPThursday good people. This week we’re going through the battle between Epic Games’ Fortnite and several artists including the owners of the Milly Rock, the Carlton dance and the Floss.
Question: Are dance moves protected by Copyright?
As usual, we gotta start at the very beginning. In 1991 Tim Sweeney founded the company Potomac Computer Systems. At the time Sweeney was a student at Maryland University in the USA.
The idea was for this to become a computer consulting company, however he ditched this idea soon thereafter and he decided to focus on making video games.