Big scoop by @KenVogel and three other fearsome NYT bylines here, ending the sleuthing on the "Bribery-for-pardon" probe 🔽
"A billionaire San Francisco real estate developer, Sanford Diller, enlisted their help in securing clemency for a Berkeley psychologist, Hugh L. Baras" —

Whose name, let the record show, ends with an "s."

cc: @SollenbergerRC, who got that right.
As for which S-ending name it was, it goes to show that internet guesswork tends to be wrong. It's better to pursue firsthand information or wait for the story to develop.
By the way, this story should be read in full.

nytimes.com/2020/12/03/us/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

5 Dec
"A Judge Just Shot Down 25 of the Trump Campaign's Conspiracy Theories in Nevada"

Shooting down their baseless claims, the Nevada judge wrote the challengers “did not prove under any standard of proof" — 25 times.

A breakdown.

lawandcrime.com/2020-election/… via @lawcrimenews
"Contest[ant]s did not prove under any standard of proof that the Agilis machine malfunctioned."

That's the automated counting machine vilified in many a pro-Trump election-conspiracy suit. Image
Three of the iterations of "did not prove under any standard of proof" had to do with claims about Agilis machines.
Read 13 tweets
4 Dec
Among the Trump campaign's itemized disbursements released last night. docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/… ImageImage
Bear in mind, these are only the campaign's spending.

Trump Victory has another long set of Trump disbursements, like $294,019.95 paid to Trump Hotel Collection on Nov. 12, after Trump was the declared the loser. docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/… Image
Trump Victory is a joint fundraising committee, meaning that other big GOP interests are benefiting—incentivizing their dragging this out.

Here's the list: opensecrets.org/jfc/summary.ph… Image
Read 5 tweets
3 Dec
The same plaintiffs and lawyer who tried and failed to block certification of Michigan's election are back in court again now requesting an audit.

Their last case peddled a Dominion conspiracy theory affidavit:

lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…

Watch live now:
Their lawyer David Kallman, from the Great Lakes Legal Center, is up now.

ICYMI: Read more about his charity and others backing the pro-Trump election-overturning efforts across the United States here. lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…
Judge Kenny, who is questioning him now, is the same jurist who rejected his arguments in the other case.
Read 30 tweets
2 Dec
Amid a wave of post-election death threats across the country, a white supremacist who allegedly threatened to kill Sen. Schumer and Democrats generally has a federal court hearing this morning.

Live coverage ahead, @LawCrimeNews.

Previously: lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…
U.S. Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon has joined the call, and the arraignment is about to begin.
Through his lawyer, Brian Maiorana waives physical presence for a remote arraignment.
Read 5 tweets
1 Dec
Covering the courts for more than a decade, this is the first time that I encountered a federal judge talking about a "Bribery-for-pardon scheme" in a heavily redacted document—or any document whatsoever.
There's a lot more to unpack here in my story going live shortly on @LawCrimeNews, but for now, I will leave you with the regular admonition to #AlwaysReadTheFootnotes.
To dispel the inevitable howl of conspiracy theorists "Why is this coming out now?"—

The answer is simple and was given when the order was secretly issued on Aug. 28 this year:

Judge Howell gave the government 90 days to produce an unsealed version of his opinion.
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec
Bill Cosby's appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is about to begin.

Watch LIVE with me for @LawCrimeNews lawandcrime.com/live-trials/li…
The Keystone State's Chief Justice Saylor calls the case.

Jennifer Bonjean is up first for Cosby, claiming the prosecution chose to indict her client's "entire life."

The crux of the appeal is the reliance of "prior bad act" evidence, other than the ones charged.
Bonjean argues this turned the case to a trial on Cosby's character.

Justice Dougherty questions Cosby's lawyer about why he didn't invoke his Fifth Amendment over a deposition.

Bonjean: "He believed that in order to not be prosecuted that this [was] part of the agreement."
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!