Covering the courts for more than a decade, this is the first time that I encountered a federal judge talking about a "Bribery-for-pardon scheme" in a heavily redacted document—or any document whatsoever.
There's a lot more to unpack here in my story going live shortly on @LawCrimeNews, but for now, I will leave you with the regular admonition to #AlwaysReadTheFootnotes.
To dispel the inevitable howl of conspiracy theorists "Why is this coming out now?"—
The answer is simple and was given when the order was secretly issued on Aug. 28 this year:
Judge Howell gave the government 90 days to produce an unsealed version of his opinion.
* her opinion.
Thanks to those who picked up on the late-day typo.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Their lawyer David Kallman, from the Great Lakes Legal Center, is up now.
ICYMI: Read more about his charity and others backing the pro-Trump election-overturning efforts across the United States here. lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…
Judge Kenny, who is questioning him now, is the same jurist who rejected his arguments in the other case.
Amid a wave of post-election death threats across the country, a white supremacist who allegedly threatened to kill Sen. Schumer and Democrats generally has a federal court hearing this morning.
SCOTUS will hear the outgoing Trump admin's appeal of a unanimous three-judge ruling rejecting its memo attempting to exclude undocumented immigrants from census apportionment.
@NewYorkStateAG pointed to an ugly pedigree of redefining "persons."
"Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State..." constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/a…