Covering the courts for more than a decade, this is the first time that I encountered a federal judge talking about a "Bribery-for-pardon scheme" in a heavily redacted document—or any document whatsoever.
There's a lot more to unpack here in my story going live shortly on @LawCrimeNews, but for now, I will leave you with the regular admonition to #AlwaysReadTheFootnotes.
To dispel the inevitable howl of conspiracy theorists "Why is this coming out now?"—

The answer is simple and was given when the order was secretly issued on Aug. 28 this year:

Judge Howell gave the government 90 days to produce an unsealed version of his opinion.
* her opinion.

Thanks to those who picked up on the late-day typo.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

3 Dec
The same plaintiffs and lawyer who tried and failed to block certification of Michigan's election are back in court again now requesting an audit.

Their last case peddled a Dominion conspiracy theory affidavit:

lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…

Watch live now:
Their lawyer David Kallman, from the Great Lakes Legal Center, is up now.

ICYMI: Read more about his charity and others backing the pro-Trump election-overturning efforts across the United States here. lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…
Judge Kenny, who is questioning him now, is the same jurist who rejected his arguments in the other case.
Read 30 tweets
2 Dec
Amid a wave of post-election death threats across the country, a white supremacist who allegedly threatened to kill Sen. Schumer and Democrats generally has a federal court hearing this morning.

Live coverage ahead, @lawcrimenews.

Previously: lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…
U.S. Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon has joined the call, and the arraignment is about to begin.
Through his lawyer, Brian Maiorana waives physical presence for a remote arraignment.
Read 5 tweets
1 Dec
Bill Cosby's appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is about to begin.

Watch LIVE with me for @LawCrimeNews lawandcrime.com/live-trials/li…
The Keystone State's Chief Justice Saylor calls the case.

Jennifer Bonjean is up first for Cosby, claiming the prosecution chose to indict her client's "entire life."

The crux of the appeal is the reliance of "prior bad act" evidence, other than the ones charged.
Bonjean argues this turned the case to a trial on Cosby's character.

Justice Dougherty questions Cosby's lawyer about why he didn't invoke his Fifth Amendment over a deposition.

Bonjean: "He believed that in order to not be prosecuted that this [was] part of the agreement."
Read 31 tweets
30 Nov
A telephone conference is about to begin in the Lev Parnas case.

I'll be following along remotely.
We're about to begin now.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicolas Roos for the govt.

Attorney Joseph Bondy appears for Lev Parnas.

Attorney Todd Blanche for Igor Fruman.

Attorney Gerald Lefcourt for Andrey Kukushkin.
U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken asks whether the parties consent to remote proceedings.

They do.
Read 18 tweets
30 Nov
SCOTUS will hear the outgoing Trump admin's appeal of a unanimous three-judge ruling rejecting its memo attempting to exclude undocumented immigrants from census apportionment.

@NewYorkStateAG pointed to an ugly pedigree of redefining "persons."

Covering live, @LawCrimeNews
The Apportionment Clause:

"Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State..." constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/a…
Oyez, oyez, oyez.

Here we go: c-span.org/video/?477428-…
Read 37 tweets
26 Nov
"'Absolutely No Allegations of Any Fraud': Pa. Court Rejects Trump Campaign's Appeal Over 69 Mail-In Ballots," via @ColinKalmbacher lawandcrime.com/2020-election/… via @lawcrimenews
Generally, the replies to this headline fall into two categories:

1) Why was the Trump campaign challenging 69 ballots in Bucks County, Pa.?

2) "Nice."

Let's explain how the ballot challenge broke down to that number.
From today's ruling:

This was the number of ballots originally subject to the Trump campaigns challenge, broken down by category.

A Supreme Court of Pa. ruling in a separate-but-related case took care of the first three categories.

Team Trump withdrew 4 and 6.

Leaving...
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!