1/ What turns a child into an adult? Puberty. It follows that if a 10 year old is given puberty blockers & 8 years later, legally an adult, decides to take cross - sex hormones, having missed this crucial stage in human development, is this really the consent of an adult?
2/ Adulthood isn’t merely the passage of time. It’s about physiological, sexual & cognitive development, including independence of thought. PBs block all of this. They deliver physically, sexually & emotionally immature ‘adults’ into the arms of big pharma & the trans lobby.
3/ This is why PBs in gender dysphoria are *completely* different to PBs for precocious puberty. A 7 yr old taking PBs to stop an early puberty will be on them for a short time before experiencing full puberty. A GD child on PBs will not & will never complete normal development.
4/ To see advocates of PBs for gender dysphoria insist that children can consent to them; that it’s about “bodily autonomy”; that it brings them “joy” —turns my stomach. Those of us that know what grooming looks like, know what this language is painfully close to.
5/ Those orgs that are blithely ignoring the Bell v Tavistock ruling, from a court that considered evidence from around the world, including from WPATH & the Endocrine Society & are saying that they know better & chanting slogans, are truly disgracing themselves & their orgs.
6/ I didn’t expect these orgs to celebrate the Bell ruling, although they should. But I did expect them to respect it. That none of them have is a crisis in child protection. It reveals something rancid at the heart of their organisations.
7/ That’s why we need a public inquiry that examines what happened at the Tavistock & what is happening with LGBTQ orgs & child safeguarding. We need a moratorium on their funding & influence. The stakes are too high. We are either a country of laws or empty ideologies.
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Court held under 16’s can only take puberty blockers if competent to understand the nature of them BUT also that there will be “enormous difficulties“ in obtaining proper consent.
Under 14’s “highly unlikely”
2/ Falls short of saying no under 16’s could consent but comes very close.
Under 18’s, still great difficulties with consent but presumption that they *may* be able to give informed consent.
1/ Ask any oncologist about GnRH analogues & they’ll likely tell you that they can be extremely effective at treating hormone sensitive disease, including cancer but their side effects are often unbearable & long term.
2/ Ask many patients who take or have taken GnRH analogues & you will hear stories of chronic insomnia, memory loss, depression, loss of sexual function & desire, osteoporosis and worse. It is a scandal that we are administering these drugs to healthy children & young people.
3/ It‘s not the same as treating a precocious puberty. That child will go through a normal puberty with the hormone protection and related benefits to their health and well-being. They will not be rendered sterile before being blasted with massive doses of cross-sex hormones.
1/ I follow (and am followed by) people from across the political spectrum. We share a commitment to reversing the extremist agenda of the LGBT trans lobby; preserving women's sex-based rights & protecting children & vulnerable young people from puberty blockers & sterilisation.
2/ Those that don’t know me are surprised at my relief at a Biden / Harris win. You shouldn’t be. I’m a Democrat. And democracy was teetering on the brink. Am I fan of Biden? No, not especially. Don’t I know that both Biden & Harris have drunk the TWAW Kool-Aid? I do.
3/ Although I wished for a Biden / Harris victory, I feared it. I’m not alone. The Equality Act / HR5 is stalled in the Republican controlled senate. That’s a relief. If passed by a Dem controlled senate it will erase women’s sex based rights. Notions of gender will replace sex.
1/ A Thread: ‘Come Together’, 1970-73, edited by Aubrey Walter, 1980, Verso Books.
Thank you to @RozKaveney for encouraging me down this path. Roz called me & the @ALLIANCELGB ’scabs’. I objected. She doubled down.
2/ Roz said that LGBA ”opposes some of the most basic demands“ of the Gay Liberation Front, founded in 1970, specifically the participation of trans people.
’Come Together‘ provides a snapshot of that early history.
It was supposed to be evidence that LGBA are traitors.
3/ ’Coming Together’ shows that LGBA is entirely true to the history of the GLF movement. To say the movement’s history included contributions from trans people is correct; to say that trans people were central to or a focus of the GLF, is not.
1/ I have to confess that when I heard that male sex offenders were being housed with female prisoners, I thought it was a joke — it isn’t. Then I thought, it must be a mistake — it isn’t.
Male prisoners are being put in with women for their comfort — no one thought about women
2/ I thought that the law had taken a wrong turn, that if we looked at how the state had considered the rights, safety & dignity of women we could correct the wrong turn & correct this obvious & egregious error.
But there was no error: women were simply not considered.
3/ As Professor Michael Biggs’ paper illustrates (embedded in thread ) trans activists were able to convince lawyers & judges to *completely* ignore the rights, safety & dignity of women in ruling that the comfort of trans identified males took priority over imprisoned females.
2/ ‘Schools have been discouraged from working with organisations that produce materials suggesting “non-conformity to gender stereotypes should be seen as synonymous with having a different gender identity”’.
Reverse ferret all you like — we have the receipts.
3/ Strip away the sexist stereotypes & 1950s gender roles & the emperor is stark bloody naked.