#FridayPhysicsFun - One of the weirdest physical effects I know about is the Casimir effect (in my mental ranking it is just a step down from the Aharanov-Bohm effect). physicsworld.com/a/the-casimir-…
If you place two uncharged conductive surfaces close together in vacuum, there is an attractive force between them. Why? Because the vacuum between them has less energy than the vacuum outside them. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_e…scholarpedia.org/article/Casimi…
Empty space, according to quantum field theory, is full of possible electromagnetic waves and they all have a finite zero-point energy. However, normally the only thing that matters is differences between this energy and fields with actual waves.
When you put the two surfaces close to each other only waves with wavelengths shorter than the distance are possible. That means that the energy in the vacuum between them is less than the energy in the vacuum outside. There is an inward pressure on the plates.
The force is weak and falls off with the fourth power of distance. It is also short range, typically measurable over a few tens of nanometers. But it is measurable. arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0…
It doesn't have to always be attractive. By coating one of the plates with a thin film it can become repulsive when they are too close and attractive beyond it, enabling a stable equilibrium. phys.org/news/2019-06-c… science.sciencemag.org/content/364/64…
It doesn't have to be plane plates. For microstructures all sorts of interactions can happen. nature.com/articles/nphot…
The idea that the quantum vacuum has a zero-point energy is not strange in itself and would seem to be a nice way of explaining the dark energy... except that so far all calculations produce *way* too much energy to work.
Negative energy densities are just the thing to hold wormholes open, so the Casimir effect gives some hope despite being very wimpy. It shows that the energy conditions in relativity are not quite iron-clad. link.springer.com/article/10.114…
There is also the Scharnhorst effect, that the index of refraction is predicted to be below 1 and allow light to move faster than outside. Unfortunately the effect is is tiny, a factor of 10^-32, and pretty debated. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scharnhor…
If nothing else it is a nice handwave for how your fictional time machine works. imdb.com/title/tt164747…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK, what is it that I am missing when people go on about environmental impact of ML? Strubell et al estimate of 284 tons CO2equiv for big transformer training is about what you get for 300 tons of steel: short railway bridge. Industrial countries produce megatons steel annually.
My guess: original point "your computation actually has environmental impact and cost" got transmuted - by not comparing to other *industrial* things - into "your computation is a serious environmental issue".
Energy cost of computation/comms *as a whole* does matter (Koomey's law needs to be speeded up), but the ML focus seems more be to knock something with currently high prestige compared to corporate database management or webservers.
New paper out by Andrew E. Snyder-Beattie, me, Eric Drexler and @mbbonsall about how the timing of evolutionary transitions on Earth suggests intelligent life is rare: liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.10…
There is life on Earth but this is not evidence for life being common in the universe! This is since observing life requires living *observers*. Even if life is very rare, the observers will all see they are on planets with life. Observation selection effects need to be handled!
Observer selection effects are annoying can produce apparently paradoxical effects such that your friends on average have more friends than you or that our existence "prevents" recent giant meteor impacts. But one can control for them with some ingenuity! fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/upl…
#FridayPhysicsFun - Today I made a loaf of bread. I also learned that bread spontaneously forms heat pipes that move heat and moisture more efficiently. And that the internal structure kind of imitates the large scale structure of the universe.
The heat pipe info is from Nathan Myhrvold and Francisco J. Migoya in their book Modernist Bread, based on earlier research by food scientists. physicsworld.com/a/the-physics-…
When you heat dough in the oven, at first the surface heats up and starts to dry out. Water diffuses outward, and there is likely some capillary action causing wicking too.
Everybody has seen light caustics since they are everywhere: reflections and refractions in glasses and cups, the net pattern cast by sunlit waves on walls and boats, rainbows & halos.
Caustics happen when a lot of light rays get bundled together. The term caustic comes from the Greek word kaustos for "burnt" - the concentrated light at the focal point of a magnifying glass is hot. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caustic_(…
Friday physics fun: One of my favourite papers is Fukugita, M., & Peebles, P. J. E. (2004). The cosmic energy inventory. The Astrophysical Journal, 616(2), 643. arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0…
The paper attempts to estimate how much mass-energy of different kinds there are in the universe. Is there more plasma than gas? Is there more light than infrared radiation? Are there more primeval neutrinos than "new" cosmic rays?
It turns out that most of the mass-energy contents of the universe are dark matter and dark energy, with a small slice of normal baryonic matter, and a tiny fraction of energy of various kinds. public.flourish.studio/visualisation/…
It seems that the UN is endorsing the kind of reasoning that made medieval priests claim pestilence was due to human sins or modern fundamentalists that earthquakes due to gay marriage. Same bad logic and theology.
This is essentially a religious perspective. Which might be a fine belief to hold, but religious freedom means one can also reject it freely. A scientific perspective on the environment regards risks as amoral and applying no matter what you believe.
Since the virus emerged from too close contact with nature in a wet market, a reasonable (and ethical) response is to reduce such contact. But it has nothing to do with nature being in a corner.