The media plays a crucial role in highlighting the important facts the public should know by selecting, broadcasting, and emphasizing what events the public should classify and comprehend as important and what the public should assess as a threat
This paper explores the notion that the media reinforces a false synonym between Muslims and terrorism.
I begin with a description of news framing bias and how this bias impacts the portrayal of terrorism and Muslims through politically and emotionally charged discourse
Then, through a content analysis of local and national news articles, I examine selected terrorist events in France and Turkey, analyzing the U.S media’s portrayal of these events to uncover what elements journalists select, emphasize,
uncover what elements journalists select, emphasize, and deemphasize in countries with predominantly Muslim and non-Muslim populations. This analysis is useful in uncovering the mechanisms allowing U.S perception of perceived threat to rise in tandem with
useful in uncovering the mechanisms allowing U.S perception of perceived threat to rise in tandem with U.S national security’s placement on the current policy agenda, while the actual risks posed by terrorism and Muslim populations are marginal in comparison & continue to decline
The findings suggest that news media framing utilizes biased, negative imagery, portraying the events in these countries in a way that reinforces current prejudices against Muslims, even when Muslims are themselves the victims.
This unequal reporting increases viewership while simultaneously allowing current perceptions about terrorism and Muslims to continue.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Journalist and commentator Mehdi Hasan recently went on MSNBC to argue that, for white mass shooters, the question is “always, was he mentally ill, deranged, loner,” while a Muslim shooter is always “a terrorist fueled by ideology."
To truly measure & understand variations in media coverage of terrorism, we need two things: a clear set of cases to study and a clear set of media sources to consider. As researchers, we rely on incident-level terrorism datasets that are systemic and unbiased –
are systemic and unbiased – such as the Global Terrorism Database – to identify which attacks to study. We then consider all media coverage of those incidents from a specific news outlet or set of news outlets.
The report, entitled How the British Media Reports on Terrorism, corroborates previous research and highlights how the terms “terrorist”, “terrorism”, or “terror” are used primarily with the terms “Islam” or “Muslim” – almost nine times more than when the perpetrator was
Indeed, the research notes that attacks by “Muslim” perpetrators in the US between 2006 and 2015 received, on average, 357% more coverage than other attacks (compared to “non-Muslim” counterparts)
Signal AI’s media monitoring tool scanned over 200,000 articles on 11 different attacks and found that Muslim perpetrators were labelled “terrorists” 78.4% of the time. In contrast, far-right perpetrators were only identified as “terrorists”, 23.6% of the time.
However, in reality, the PREVENT strategy sets a dangerous precedent and involves monitoring innocent people. It has severe implications for free-speech, and disproportionately targets Muslims.
However, it isn’t just Muslims who are at risk. The vague language of PREVENT – opposition to “British values” is “non-violent extremism” – is a risk to the freedom of all people.
The vague language of PREVENT – opposition to “British values” is “non-violent extremism” – is a risk to the freedom of all people. Environmental activists have been harassed by police officers, their families questioned, simply because they attended anti-fracking protests
“Initially I was so upset and distraught that I told him not to do any more drawings … God bless him, he said: ‘I won’t draw anything ... I’ll just draw a house, or the remote control. And I said: ‘Don’t draw the remote!’”
The parents of the 14-year-old said they were taking legal action after the boy said he was left “scared and nervous” by his experience with school officials, and was left reluctant to join in class discussions for fear of being suspected of extremism.
November 27, the Collectif Contre Islamophobie en France (CCIF) published a “final statement” in response to a November 19 dissolution order from the govn
CCIF stated on Twitter that they were “reproached for doing our legal work, applying the law & demanding its application.”
The CCIF was one of the largest charities in France, primarily offering legal support to Muslims across the country in discrimination cases.
We have to be delivering a curriculum
that enables children to understand the benefits that exist in a society where diversity & difference are celebrated.