People who do shameful things should be ashamed, and if they aren’t, then others should shame them, to give them a chance to learn the rudimentary difference between right and wrong they should have mastered by age three.
This is a society. Other people exist.
Enablement of abusive behavior isn’t morality. It’s abuse.
This isn’t the tough part. You actually don’t need outside permission to decide that shameful behavior is shameful. You don’t have to wait for authorization to hold principles or stand up for them.
One thing we now know to a reasonable degree of certainty is that if saying "Merry Christmas" killed the person you said it to, it would make conservative Christians want to say it more, not less.
help I am being cancelled, the worst fate imaginable
To white American conservative Christians it sure seems to be.
If the only answer to abusive people is successfully persuading them not to be abusive...
Then the abuse becomes everyone else’s fault, for not catering to the abuser sufficiently enough to persuade him.
Which is exactly the way an abusive person wants you to think.
So, don’t.
Our goal is not persuading abusive people. Our goal is stopping them.
If an abuser proved willing to be persuaded, then persuade them.
If not, abandon persuasion, and stop them some other way.
Insisting that persuasion is our goal seems like the moral position, because persuading people to do good is good.
But making it the goal is actually an immoral position. It makes persuasion a prerequisite. It cedes power to the abuser and responsibility to the abused.
INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS is, in my opinion, very good. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ½
I still put PULP FICTION higher (and maybe RESERVOIR DOGS? needs a rewatch) but this is the one where almost every Tarantino outré impulse works like crazy for me.
There are at least 3 different registers happening simultaneously ranging from Hollywoodish realism to modern expressionistic Shoshanna parts to Brad Pitt's broad cartoon all filtered through exploitation film and it s/b a total mess (and for some it is) but for me it just slays.
There are a lot of people who think "defund the police" is a bad slogan.
But it's a directional intention. A compass statement.
The real effect of calling it a bad slogan, whether or not intentional (but usually intentional), is to reduce a compass statement down to a slogan.
Whenever there is a real problem and a clear solution, there will be people who benefit from the problem and therefore oppose the solution in a variety of ways.
And this is true of any real problem, not just the problem of lawless militarized white supremacist police.