The question Lord Hanuman posed when there was delay in fulfilling promise made to Lord Shri Rama
कर्तुं दाशरथेः प्रीतिमाज्ञायां किन्न सज्जसे
"Why don't you issue orders which will please Rama" is the reference devotees seek under Art 78(c) read w Art 60
कर्तुं दाशरथेः प्रीतिमाज्ञायां किन्न सज्जसे under Art 78(c) w Art 60
When clarification pleasing a Muslim Prince of Arcot can be issued honoring agreement made by British Why can't above order pleasing Lord Shri Rama be issued honoring agreement made by Shri Marthanda Varma ?
Devotional approach suggested by Shri Kulashekara Alwar was followed by his descendant Shri Marthanda Varma by donating Kingdom to Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity the pious purpose which protected Travancore Kingdom during last pandemic that we inherited & need to reclaim
कर्तुं दाशरथेः प्रीतिमाज्ञायां किन्न सज्जसे
Pleasing Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity through Deity Rights order restoring pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma will protect us frm Covid
Why delay orders ref devotees seek u Art 78(c) w Art 60 His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn
कर्तुं दाशरथेः प्रीतिमाज्ञायां किन्न सज्जसे
Sage Pulastya is advising that by pleasing Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity we can be rid of diseases why then there is a delay in Deity rights order is ref u Art 78(c) w Art 60 devotees seek from His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn
The Constitution framed under leadership of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar was adopted with "Dharma is the King of Kings" as the basic structure. Rectifying adharmik alteration of basic structure restoration of Art 26 Hindu Deity Rights is what devotees are seeking
Let us chant OM Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏so that His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn the rep of Nation's Dharma can guide the Nation on the path of Dharma using his constitutional powers under Art 78(c) with Art 60 as our welfare depends on us following Dharma.
Dr. Radhakrishnan while supporting resolution for adoption of Constitution stated we are reiterating our ancient ideal “Dharma is the King of Kings” i.e
“Dharmosmatkuladaivatam” arising out of pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma's great Kingdom donation to Dharma we inherited
Travancore interim Constitution put protection of Dharma arising out of pious purpose great Kingdom donation of Shri Marthanda Varma beyond the powers of Secular State interference. The same was inherited in our Constitution in the form of Art 26 by efforts of Kanchi Paramacharya
Thus the protection of Dharma arising out of pious purpose of great Kingdom donation of Shri Marthanda Varma that we inherited is protected u Art 26 from Secular State interference the most basic feature of our Constitution which sustains every other fundamental right incl Art 32
In view of delay by MHA on Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification request all Hon'ble MPs who earlier sent their letters of support to send letter of support requesting His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn to invoke Art 78(c) read with Art 60
Request Shri @DrRanjithReddy garu to consider further letter of support for Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification on above lines for welfare of our Nation which depends on securing protection of Dharma during these critical covid times.
Request Shri @RaghuRaju_MP garu to consider further letter of support for Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification on above lines for welfare of our Nation which depends on securing protection of Dharma during these critical covid times.
The @People4Dharma historic letter explains the basis of Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement July 18th letter conveyed by His Koorma form appearing in Shivalayam of temple to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn to follow Dharma for protection of Dharma
Since Chilkur Balaji Temple follows Sri Ahobila Matha sampradaya path to restore back protection of Dharma by having Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji fulfill his April 18th 2019 promise to Hindu Deities which secured victory is explained in letter to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn
As His excellency @rashtrapatibhvn has been approached u Art 60 to provide suitable dharmik advice to council of ministers headed by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji a devotee; His Excellency can consult Acharyas give advice to fulfill 👆promise👇notification.
Appreciate quick action of AP Archaka Samakhya in ensuring dissolution of Trust Board action against people who were involved in attack on hereditary Archaka who was doing his duty w devotion to ensure free darshan for devotees as per sampradaya of temple we should not stop here.
AP Dharmika Parishad when it was operational had grievances cell for Archakas which had very eminent people including Dr MVS and acted as a check on such Endowments Dept officials and Trustboard members who have tendency to ill treat Archaka community members legacy of 30/87 Act.
AP Dharmika Parishad itself was born out of amendment to 30/87 Act through a grass root movement which was triggered by supreme sacrifice of Shir Bheemasena Chary on the bell of a temple due to harassment of the officials to bring to notice of society the draconian nature of Act.
Late Nani Palkhivala warned that in the name of reform don't reform a religion out of existence. Covid experience has shown that Secular State in the name of reform should not reform protection of Dharma out of existence putting at risk welfare of Nation.
We could as a society have avoided lot of Covid pain if we had paid due attention to Voice of Dharma which asked us to rectify Sabarimala judgement denying Deity rights the reformation of protection of Dharma for our own welfare is gist of @People4Dharma
Hope His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn will use his extraordinary powers that exist in Constitution to act as per Art 60 oath and put a full stop to this selective reformation experiment of secular state on Hindu religion which has put our welfare at risk.
The issue is loss of Art 26 rights for Hindu Religious denomination in legal personality of Deity which existed on 26th Jan 1950. We need to address this root cause else the secular state will make us go round the Courts forever for every temple property.
Pious purpose of the donor is protected in legal personality of Deity u Art 26 there cannot be any diversion as it is the fundamental right of denomination exercised through Deity. Let us make this clear to Secular State by supporting Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement
Let us reclaim right of Hindu Religious denomination in legal personality of Hindu Deities which existed on 26th Jan 1950 as per agreement with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity arising out of kingdom donation by Shri Marthanda Varma please support👇