Here's a fascinating paper (preprint) that analyzes relative influence of international scientific experts (purple) vs. other groups on discourse re. COVID. You can see how rapidly politically-motivated communities (green) took over the conversation in Feb 2020 (fig. 3d, e).
Relative size of political community (blue) vs. others on Twitter discussion of COVID-19. Nice visualization! Thanks to @MarionKoopmans for sending the link. Great analysis from @FraDurazzi & colleagues! Part of the @EuropeVeo that I'm now on Sci. Advisory Board of.
Despite headline, I can't find a paper that reports SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 in foxes. Here is the @OIEAnimalHealth guidance this article refers to - no mention of foxes, although it broadly suggests should have heightened concern over all farmed mammals oie.int/fileadmin/Home…
Raccoon dogs, mink, ferrets, rabbits known to be infected in lab or farms w/ SARS-CoV-2. Other species known to be receptive to this virus or SARS-CoV (e.g. civets, cats, dogs), so ample reason for concern, increased surveillance etc.
More details on @WHO visit to China re. COVID origins. No WIV visit planned. I guess @WHO scientists looked at all published data & concluded, like almost all other virologists, that there's no evidence for it coming out of lab & lots for a natural origin. independent.co.uk/news/world/asi…
For those who believe lab leak, or bioengineered theory, or want to 'investigate' that, I believe ultimately they will be disappointed. Finding origins of SARS-CoV-2 will likely involve detailed, lengthy fieldwork, behavioral risk analysis, mapping of wildlife farms & trade..
We've done a lot already (see paper below, now accepted by @NatureComms), & we would be able to do much more to identify origins of COVID & risk of next one, but unfortunately same conspiracies led to our @NIH funding being frozen/terminated!! biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Taking part in the @WHO@rd_blueprint Global Research & Innovation Forum today. Here's a comment from @DrMikeRyan: "Countries w/ govts that communicate complex science directly to the public, & use science as a basis for control, have had much better success fighting COVID-19"
.@WHO Director General @DrTedros gives his opening comments: "At our 1st @rd_blueprint mtg in Feb. we knew so little about COVID-19. We need to continue working hard on the science behind this disease through these working groups to defeat the pandemic"
.@Dr_Wildlife from @EcoHealthNYC reports on the Animal-Human link in COVID emergence. "The animal trade & consumption pathway needs more attention - not just wildlife trade, but also livestock and fur farming"
Adds more evidence SARS-CoV-2 emerged naturally: High diversity of bat-CoVs in wild; 100+ Sarbecovirus genus sequences (SARS1/2 clade); Pangolin viruses close to SARS-CoV-2 but RaTG13 & RmYN02 bat-CoVs closer (Rhinolophus hosts). This clade has Spike insertion cf. SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) prob emerged from Rhinolophus bat-CoV clade in SW China or neighboring countries. 2 closest (RaTG13/RmYN02) from Yunnan close to Myanmar & both bat hosts found across SE Asia. Sampling only in China, so can't rule out origin in Myanmar, Lao PDR, Vietnam etc.
Sorry for the politics but this is just wrong. While US deals w/ yet another police killing of a black man. While COVID rages, @realDonaldTrump begins press conf. blaming China for pandemic, trying to distract from appalling leadership fighting outbreak. cbsnews.com/news/trump-pre…
Our President should not be severing relationship with @WHO period, let alone during the middle of the outbreak of the century. I'm saddened to say that @WHO did a better job than we did here in US of dealing with COVID-19.
I am trying to keep the politics out of our pandemic analysis, but it's really hard when what should be a time to speak frankly about our crises here in the US turns into a badly-timed, insensitive, & upside down narrative about 'Wuhan virus'. Just disastrous on many levels.
Thanks for the critique Jonathan. This is a poorly designed phylogenetic study with too many inferences & not enough data, riding on a wave of conspiracy to drive a higher impact.
It's riddled with inaccuracies that suggest lack of understanding of the data they've analyzed e.g. "The S of RaTG13 is also capable of binding to human ACE2 although the virus does not infect humans (49)." This virus has not been isolated, so unknown whether can infect people.
or "..response to [SARS] deployed...strategies that were key to detecting ..adaptation to humans & cross-species transmission..(i) Sampling animals from markets, farms, & wild populations ..." Wrong: sampling of wild populations began later, based on our research, not response.