I have my disagreements with this piece by @DanielBShapiro but there’s common sense in many of his recommendations. The U.S. & Israel share common goals; the important differences will be tactical over the question of when & how to wield leverage. washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/1…
Dan perhaps understandably avoids the real tactical and profound disagreements between the Biden and Netanyahu teams of how and when to use leverage.
The Biden folks believe they can offer major preemptive concessions to encourage Iran back into the JCPOA and then negotiate a follow on agreement that addresses the sunsets and other nuclear and non-nuclear problems.
The Israelis, having seen this movie before between 2013 & 2015, believe this is a huge mistake because it sacrifices important leverage that is not easily re-established and creates a negotiating dynamic where Iran will, once again, run circles around western negotiators.
This is also profound disagreement over very architecture of the JCPOA that, for Netanyahu team, is not fixed by extending sunsets: Iran will still be able to develop an industrial-size enrichment capability buried underground powered by easy-to-hide advanced centrifuges.
Iran also never had to account for its military-nuclear program under the JCPOA as these concerns were brushed aside by Kerry. The nuke archive, SPND, Fahrizadeh’s activities since 2003 & ongoing Iranian NPT violations make it imperative any new agreement resolve these issues.
There may be more common ground over confronting Iranian regional aggression. A more sober-minded Biden team does not hold the delusions of Kerry et al who believed Rouhani/Zarif were reformers & that you could moderate the hard men of Tehran by flooding them with cash.
Bottom line. I agree with Dan that there’s an opportunity for more common ground than in 2013-2015 but only if clear-eyed, tough-minded pragmatists have the upper hand over JCPOA and regime-engagement theologians.
In debate over nukes, missiles, terrorism & regional aggression, Biden team must not forget the Iranian people’s long-standing desire to overthrow the regime that has brutalized them for four decades. Human rights & support for a peaceful democratic transition must be a priority.
During the 2017/2018 democratic uprising in Iran, @DanielBShapiro and I put aside our JCPOA disagreements and wrote about supporting the Iranian people. Hoping there can be more of this in 2021. politico.com/magazine/story…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread. Nuclear versus Economic Snapbacks: How nuclear extortion beats economic pressure every time when a US president fears Iranian nuclear escalation.
1. We warned in 2015 that Iran has a nuclear snapback, a threat of nuke blackmail that would block an American economic snapback, unless a US president refused to be extorted and was prepared to go it alone.
2. We also argued in 2015 that the US economic snapback was powerful enough that you didn’t need EU or other multilateral support. Companies would choose America over Iran when put to a stark choice — and OFAC was prepared to vigorously enforce US sanctions.
Israeli PM just revealed Hezbollah missile depot next to gas company near Beirut airport, saying depot could be cause of catastrophic explosion similar to Beirut port.
Long past time to sanction Hezbollah for war crimes under human shields law passed 535-0 & signed in Dec 2018.
Hezbollah’s precision-guided missile manufacturing site is located under four seven-story apartment buildings in Beirut that are home to 70 families.
Hezbollah should be designated by @USTreasury for war crimes.
Multiple Hezbollah precision-guided missile manufacturing sites in civilian areas in Beirut.
Hezbollah is using civilians as human shields in violation of U.S. law and international norms.
Even UNGA passed a resolution condemning use of human shields.
Quoted: “Protections already exist for humanitarian trade,” but this “has a major chilling effect on any financial entities considering doing business with Iran.
Note: humanitarian transactions take place through the central bank of Iran thanks to General License No. 8 and not through these 14-16 banks. OFAC also gives comfort letters to foreign banks and a Swiss channel exists to facilitate this trade: sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/ofac-issues-ne…
The blacklisting of the financial sector is a logical extension of the FinCEN 311 finding and the reimposition of countermeasures by FATF. The entire financial sector supports regime’s illicit activities.
“The government-aligned Kayhan newspaper called the series an “anti-Iranian production” that reveals the “pro-West and promiscuous” agenda of anti-Iran activists.”