Thread. Nuclear versus Economic Snapbacks: How nuclear extortion beats economic pressure every time when a US president fears Iranian nuclear escalation.
1. We warned in 2015 that Iran has a nuclear snapback, a threat of nuke blackmail that would block an American economic snapback, unless a US president refused to be extorted and was prepared to go it alone.
2. We also argued in 2015 that the US economic snapback was powerful enough that you didn’t need EU or other multilateral support. Companies would choose America over Iran when put to a stark choice — and OFAC was prepared to vigorously enforce US sanctions.
3. But this economic snapback would only work if you had a US president who didn’t fear Iranian escalation and was prepared to maximize pressure even against such threats.
4. Now the incoming Biden team admits they were wrong about the power of the economic snapback when they said in 2015 that the sanctions regime would collapse without EU support.
5. But now they’re arguing that they can preemptively lift the most powerful economic sanctions by returning to the JCPOA — and reimpose them if Iran doesn’t agree to a new deal.
6. Okay, give them credit for admitting they were wrong then. But they’re wrong now. Iran’s nuke snapback, its threat to expand their nuke program if America reimposes sanctions, will defeat the threat of economic snapback. Biden team fears escalation & the mullahs know that.
7. Iran will pocket the massive sanctions relief from a return to the JCPOA, continue building to an industrial-size, advance centrifuge-powered, near-zero breakout, easier-clandestine sneakout, and refuse to agree to any more concessions.
8. And why not? The JCPOA gives them patient pathways to nuclear weapons, ICBMs, an economy increasingly immunized against sanctions pressure & regional dominance, as restrictions sunset & American leverage diminishes.
9. Iran knows its nuke snapback is more powerful than America’s economic snapback — especially under a president who fears Iranian escalation and won’t go it alone against opposition from Europeans (who fear this escalation even more and whose companies stand to make billions).
Lesson: Don’t return to JCPOA. Don’t give preemptive relief. Don’t back down in the face of nuke extortion. Use all instruments of American (and Israeli leverage). That’s only way to reach new deal that actually blocks not paves Iran’s pathways to nuke weapons & regional power.
11. One final thought: How do I know that Biden team will back down again from Iranian nuke extortion? Because that’s exactly what they’re doing now. The regime escalating nuke program & Biden team promises return to sunsetting JCPOA & lifting of most powerful economic sanctions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have my disagreements with this piece by @DanielBShapiro but there’s common sense in many of his recommendations. The U.S. & Israel share common goals; the important differences will be tactical over the question of when & how to wield leverage. washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/1…
Dan perhaps understandably avoids the real tactical and profound disagreements between the Biden and Netanyahu teams of how and when to use leverage.
The Biden folks believe they can offer major preemptive concessions to encourage Iran back into the JCPOA and then negotiate a follow on agreement that addresses the sunsets and other nuclear and non-nuclear problems.
Israeli PM just revealed Hezbollah missile depot next to gas company near Beirut airport, saying depot could be cause of catastrophic explosion similar to Beirut port.
Long past time to sanction Hezbollah for war crimes under human shields law passed 535-0 & signed in Dec 2018.
Hezbollah’s precision-guided missile manufacturing site is located under four seven-story apartment buildings in Beirut that are home to 70 families.
Hezbollah should be designated by @USTreasury for war crimes.
Multiple Hezbollah precision-guided missile manufacturing sites in civilian areas in Beirut.
Hezbollah is using civilians as human shields in violation of U.S. law and international norms.
Even UNGA passed a resolution condemning use of human shields.
Quoted: “Protections already exist for humanitarian trade,” but this “has a major chilling effect on any financial entities considering doing business with Iran.
Note: humanitarian transactions take place through the central bank of Iran thanks to General License No. 8 and not through these 14-16 banks. OFAC also gives comfort letters to foreign banks and a Swiss channel exists to facilitate this trade: sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/ofac-issues-ne…
The blacklisting of the financial sector is a logical extension of the FinCEN 311 finding and the reimposition of countermeasures by FATF. The entire financial sector supports regime’s illicit activities.
“The government-aligned Kayhan newspaper called the series an “anti-Iranian production” that reveals the “pro-West and promiscuous” agenda of anti-Iran activists.”