"Small" because this is still highly company-controlled, like the user trust of the Chinese EV company NIO. Airbnb as final say on what it does with user input and how it spends the user endowment.
"Significant" because this helps normalize the idea that platform companies should have built-in accountability to users. It's well aligned business and should be an expectation in exchange for any loyalty.
Could there be a race to the top, where platforms have to compete for users with ever-deeper mechanisms of accountability?
Maybe, but probably only if we adjust the market design accordingly with policy.
This is part of a longer story. A couple years ago, Airbnb submitted a pretty remarkable letter to the SEC asking to share equity with users: huffingtonpost.com/entry/uber-air…
That is: doing so would be not feasible under current policy. The SEC basically said no to a rule change.
There you have it: greedy techies arent the only reason we don't have widespread economic democracy. Even if the techies wanted it (many do), the law doesn't make it easy or plausible.
Again, a big bad company is attempting to turn cooperation into a competitive advantage. In still-centralized and probably plutocratic ways—but still, in the process, normalizing notions of accountability and shared ownership.
If you want to see the little-r, good-er version of #ExitToCommunity, come to the showcase of our startup cohort on Tuesday: bit.ly/e2cshowcase
Not little for long, I hope.
In the meantime, I hope that the definite flaws and limitations of these emerging examples don't diminish from the very real possibility that they represent, if we fight for it and demand it: that shared ownership and accountability become basic norms and zones of creativity
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's hard to convey the stakes and satisfaction of the Bernie-Bloomberg matchup for people who were involved in @OccupyWallStNYC. The more I keep seeing old #Occupy friends campaigning, the more I want to start a [thread].
@OccupyWallStNYC For what it's worth, I once wrote a book about Occupy, and it's at lots of libraries if you want to get caught up on what happened now (phew) almost a decade ago: nathanschneider.info/books/thank-yo…
@OccupyWallStNYC And as the title suggests (Thank You, Anarchy), there is no clean line between Occupy and electoral politics. Some leading activists then continue to eschew electoral politics as fake politics. They are not not-right. But by far more have entered the fray.
@P2P_Foundation@mbauwens For one thing it was a reminder of how much I've depended on P2PF's work over the years. Such an important synthesizing role.
But more to the point, this report highlights and connects some of the leading-edge projects that leverage new ledger tech for the common good, rather than subjugating the common good to ledgers. This is a super important distinction.
@WholeFoods@HowIBuiltThis@foodcoops Mackey wanted to create a market where ppl could do all their shopping, even if it meant carrying some non-pure stuff. Meanwhile, too many food co-ops kept to purity while members had to go to Walmart for essentials.
@WholeFoods@HowIBuiltThis@foodcoops And (not so relevant to the Whole Foods case) co-ops have often opted not to provide cheaper or culturally relevant food to their lower income neighbors.