If you have not yet been convinced just how batshit crazy the Trump attack on the election is, just take a look at this filing challenging the alleged expert testimony offered in support of the Trump position.
I would call your attention to the first paragraph on page 28 which provides as follows:
"In support of their motion, Plaintiffs cite the "expert testimony" of an individual whose name is redacted but is referred to by Plaintiffs as "Spyder."
"In support of their motion, Plaintiffs cite the "expert testimony" of an individual whose name is redacted but is referred to by Plaintiffs as "Spyder."
See Mot. to File Under Seal, ECF 5 at 9. Spyder claims to be an "electronic intelligence analyst . . . with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence" and "extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world."
Decl. of "Spyder" ("Spyder Decl.") ECF No. 1-9, ¶ 2. Other than claiming to work for "top election specialists," Spyder does not disclose whether s/he has any experience with election administration or the
companies, software and machines used by states to conduct elections.
companies, software and machines used by states to conduct elections.
Because Spyder is not named, it is impossible to verify or even research what Spyder's credentials may be. On the record before the Court, Spyder cannot qualify as an expert given his/her lack of relevant education, training, experience, knowledge, and skill."
I have posted the entire filing here: slnews.us/pbgl120520b
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
