3/ Trump pushed *certain NATO members* (read: Germany and friends) to meet their obligations. including spending 2% of GDP on defense.
mind you, not "sending the money to NATO", just spending on their own defense. buying own gear is fine. follow your commitment.
4/ but NATO members (particularly Germany) balked at it. why wouldn't they? they were *certain* their neolib/neocon american pals will let it slide anyway.
5/ an *unconditional* commitment to NATO comes with an *unbound* price.
that's not how you do international politics. you make trades and deals and if your partners balk, you reserve the option to walk away.
6/ to re-iterate; the "NATO or bust" pledge Michael suggests
instantly puts USA at disadvantage vis-a-vis its *declared* partners like Germany.
my 2nd biggest gripe with the society right now is "inform yourself", in the sense of "caveat emptor". #SundayRant
2/ it's a fine sentiment when you trade with 30 people for 50 kinds of things & services, many of which you can reasonably do yourself and have general understanding of.
not when you trade with 300,000 people for 5,000,000 things & services that are mostly opaque to you.
3/ "staying informed" is a lottery. good from society-manager's point of view, miserable from individual's.
which is incidentally the main reason i tend to prefer larger suppliers & service providers over smaller ones. *feels* like less research is needed every time i buy.