1/
reminder, there are plenty of short leftist memes floating around

we don't consider them *memes* because the reward is very alien to us (moral permission to do evil for "greater good")

2/
Daniel implies that strong reactions are propagandized, while natural reactions are weak and need deep deprogramming to surface.

3/
what is leftism?

*destroying social structure*, says Daniel

4/
why would Daniel make such terrifying claim about leftism?

was he deeply propagandized by the right? is he on a crusade to expose the problems inherent to the left?
5/
ah, quite the opposite: @apeirophobic is a hardcore leftist, and believes destruction of various social structures is "good".
6/
which brings us back around to the nature of leftist memes:

the reward is in *moral permission for doing evils for "the greater good"*.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with mark doppelgänger 🛰

mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoppelMark

9 Dec
1/
>keeping manufacturing capability up and running is bad

it's good. expensive, sure, but good none the less. especially several *competing* programs and organizations in parallel.
2/
>rockets and tech wins wars

???

we've been there before, several times in fact. every single time humans turned out to be better at it. every time guns were removed from a fighter aircraft, they had to be re-introduced *ex post haste*.

3/
"but mark", i hear you object, "how could an imperfect human perform better than a perfect machine?"

humans are much better at making spot decisions
and at OODA, precision observation, etc.

than at predicting all possible scenarios and programming machines.
Read 10 tweets
9 Dec
1/
#Substack - good for dissenting writing or not really?

i've been reading their ToS & guidelines, thread follows
2/
the hot piece first: Content Guidelines

nebulous "Hate" is banned. even including *calls for exclusion* based on protected characteristics 🤐.

no more Boy Scouts or Lady's Day at the gym 🤡 Image
3/
Content Guidelines, cont.:

>anything that violates laws or regulations

obey Pakistani blasphemy laws? nah, luckily the Publisher Agreement ascertains that's the California, USA, jurisdiction. not bad, but...

>causing harm

in CA that means "criticism of feminists". welp :-( ImageImage
Read 13 tweets
9 Dec
1/
Alex delivers interesting news 👌

let's grab a few choice screencaps
2/
>yay book burning

wtf journalist. wtf? Image
3/
>reactive censorship is not enough

wtf journalist. wtf?? Image
Read 7 tweets
8 Dec
2/
reminded me of this 2017 vintage
>i'm a professor
>how dare you
>f--k you >f--k you >f--k you

ah yes, the good old one

Read 4 tweets
6 Dec
1/
a good read, recommend.

critique follows downthread.
2/
the language choices made - what do they tell us about the author?

how do they influence which readers will return to revisit the this particular article? Image
3/
a lot of #trad superstructure, and yet none of the keel of #RespectYourElders to be found
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!