The upcoming Critical Thinking Cafe video about the @crankyuncles game (coming Dec 15) will include an explanation of FLICC: the 5 techniques of science denial (fake experts, logical fallacies, impossible expectations, cherry picking, conspiracy theories) crankyuncle.com/game
FLICC is the backbone of the @crankyuncles game - players build up cranky points (on their way to becoming a fully fledged cranky uncle) by learning the techniques that Cranky Uncles use to deny science.
As you get further into the game, you unlock other denial techniques in the FLICC taxonomy. Each time you learn a new denial technique, you unlock more cartoon examples of each fallacy.
To learn more about FLICC, I’ve posted a history of FLICC (first conceived by @MarkHoofnagle) as well as definitions & examples of each science denial technique at a constantly evolving resource: sks.to/flicc
For academics looking for a scholarly reference introducing & explaining FLICC, here is my book chapter Deconstructing Climate Science Denial from the upcoming Edward Elgar Research Handbook in Communicating Climate Change climatechangecommunication.org/wp-content/upl…
One last thing: the first Critical Thinking Cafe video, by @Reasondisabled, @davekinkead & myself, introduced our 2018 research on using critical thinking to deconstruct climate misinformation. Full video at - full paper at sks.to/criticalclimate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Logic-based inoculation - explaining the rhetorical techniques used to mislead - is like a universal vaccine against misinformation. This is the approach used in the upcoming @crankyuncles game (coming Dec 15) crankyuncle.com/game 1/10
There are two main ways to inoculate people against misinformation: fact-based & logic-based. Fact-based corrections show how a myth is wrong by explaining facts. Logic-based corrections explain the technique or fallacy used by the myth. 2/10
We'll launch @crankyuncles game on Dec 15 - will also release a Critical Thinking Cafe video introducing the game. Shortly afterwards, will also release bloopers from the film shoot. Here's a teaser blooper of @Reasondisabled responding to my placeholder Skype sound effect.
IMO, the best moment in this blooper isn't @Reasondisabled laughing in the second take. It's his attempt to not laugh in the first take (look for the tiny suppressed smile).
Facebook claims to address their climate misinformation problem by releasing an information center, while doing nothing about climate misinformation being spread on their platform. This is like feeding a person poison while handing them a brochure about fresh vegetables. 1/9
Facebook are trying to greenwash their misinformation problem. Their platform is polluting the information landscape with climate misinformation & at the same time, they’re trying to distract us from their unwillingess to deal with the problem. 2/9
Their information center will likely have negligible impact for several reasons. First, misinformation is more viral than facts. Not being bound by reality, misinformation can be more emotive, shocking, extreme, & hence more likely to be shared. 3/9
Wow! The EPA website features a webpage about global warming using a slideshow by climate denier Richard Linzen which is packed with old, well-debunked climate misinformation epa.gov/environmental-… h/t @bud_ward
He commits the false dichotomy fallacy arguing CO2 lagging temp in the past disproves greenhouse warming. This is debunked at sks.to/lag, (Denial101x MOOC) & (Cranky Uncle)
He argues that ocean cycles could be causing observed warming, despite the fact that they only move heat around while the planet is building up heat (at a rate of over 4 atomic bombs per second). skepticalscience.com/global-warming…
Yesterday's controversy with Sinclair planning to give the Plandemic conspiracy theory an airing brings up the issue - how can the media cover scientific issues that feature misinformation & conspiracy theories without misleading the public?... 1/7
The problem with false balance media coverage is it conveys the impression of a 50:50 debate amongst scientists, which conveys a misleading impression when there’s scientific consensus. 3/7
Some qualified "good news" is Sinclair have at least delayed airing & promoting the dangerous Plandemic conspiracy theories. So between now and if/when they do air the conspiracy theory, here are some important points to consider about this issue...
Conspiracy theories & misinformation about COVID-19 are dangerous to public health. They erode public trust in institutions & scientific experts, and less likely to listen to advice to avoid spreading the virus, such as social distancing & mask-wearing.
So by giving a conspiracy theorist like Judy Mikovits a megaphone, they are amplifying misinformation, eroding public trust in scientists, & endangering the public...