China may still be hiding the truth about the origins of Covid-19: One year on, urgent questions remain about how and why this pandemic erupted inews.co.uk/opinion/china-…
"there are fears the World Health Organisation is appeasing China, which desperately wants to blame other nations as the source, while the scientific establishment is closing ranks to protect some key figures."
"Many experts suspect this is a natural zoonotic virus that spilled over from animals... Some credible figures, however, point to circumstantial evidence swirling around a top-security laboratory in Wuhan...
...which was carrying out cutting-edge research into bat coronaviruses linked to a similar respiratory disease that killed some miners eight years ago."
"Now the WHO, which kowtowed to Beijing in the first weeks of this pandemic with disastrous global consequences, has finally launched an inquiry. Its terms of reference accept this unusual new virus was “well adapted to human transmission from the moment it was first detected”
"– yet incredibly, give China the right to vet its team of experts and largely seem to rely on their evidence.
The 10-strong WHO team includes Peter Daszak.. He dismisses talk of leaks as “baseless” conspiracy theory, although we have seen in the past such things can happen."
"Now it has emerged he secretly drafted, then persuaded 26 top scientists to sign, a statement in The Lancet condemning “conspiracy theories” suggesting that Covid-19 does not have natural origin."
"Daszak has also been asked by the journal to chair a task force on the origins, which seems bizarre given his stance and ties to Wuhan."
"It is worth noting the top security official at WIV has admitted to safety concerns at the lab. Meanwhile Nature, another influential science journal, has had to clarify a landmark paper written by Shi Zhengli, its star virologist, and two Wuhan colleagues."
"After complaints, Nature asked the Wuhan team to publish an “addendum” that confirms this virus was linked to the miners."
"They admitted also having unshared samples of eight more Sars viruses sampled from bats in the mine, which is about 1,000 miles from their city. This is, at the very least, all rather curious."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a good case-study on why calling something a 'conspiracy' without analysing the facts or even waiting for the facts to emerge, can be misleading at best and deceitful at worse
Dismissing lab origin as a 'conspiracy' is just an attempt not to respond to facts, or to exclude possible theories without a sufficient basis to do so.
So can we do away with this label until things get settled?
"It is the great riddle of our time: how, when and where did the coronavirus emerge? Even insiders at the World Health Organisation (WHO), which is tasked with finding the answers, are alarmed to discover that China will “call the shots” in providing them."
"The investigation is a collaboration between a WHO team of foreign experts — approved by Beijing from a list submitted by UN member states — and Chinese scientists.
However, there is still no timeline for the international team to enter China..."
"...and no guarantee whom they may interview, what records they will be able to see and whether they will be allowed to visit Wuhan... Instead, the WHO and Beijing have agreed that Chinese researchers will conduct the early stages of the investigation."
Some interesting Wuhan Institute of Virology tenders from 2020:
1. Competitive negotiation on the procurement of biosafety autoclaves and medical double-door autoclaves by Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (May 13, 2020)
2. Announcement on the transaction of the sewage treatment and upgrading project of the comprehensive experimental research base of virology and biosafety (July 14, 2020)
3. Announcement on the Transaction of the Security Service Procurement Project in Zhengdian Research Park of Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (September 24, 2020)
Some pretty fascinating Wuhan Institute of Virology tenders from 2019:
1. Announcement of Competitive Consultation on Maintenance Project of P3 Laboratory and Laboratory Animal Center in Zhengdian Park, WIV, CAS (March 01, 2019)
2. Announcement of the transaction for the renovation project of the hazardous waste treatment system in Zhengdian Park, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (July 31, 2019)
3. Announcement of winning the bid for the procurement project of the environmental air disinfection system and the scalable automated sample storage management system of Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (August 14, 2019)
"The four papers in question are Liu et al., Xiao et al. , Lam et al. and Zhang et al. The two that are currently being investigated by the journal editors are Liu et al and Xiao et al."
"Liu et al. did not publish or share (upon being asked) raw and/or missing data that would allow experts to independently verify their genomic analyses."
"Editors at both Nature and PLoS Pathogens, as well as Professor Stanley Perlman, the editor of Liu et al., have acknowledged in email communications that they are aware of serious issues with these papers and that the journals are investigating them."
"An epidemic cannot start naturally in Wuhan. It is not a coherent geographical origin. To explain it, humans have to intervene at one point or another."
Alexandre Hassanin, researcher at the National Museum of Natural History to franceinfo
"The work published for 15 yrs by this institute & in particular the lab of Shi Zhengli consisted in sampling viruses in wildlife in order to try to understand the mechanisms of crossing the species barrier to try to protect yourself from it,” Virologist Etienne Decroly notes.