Now the clique that believes in silence in the face of all abuse and criticism suddenly wants hard hitting questions now that the royals are being criticised. Let’s think of some hard hitting questions they could ask...
1. How did you feel when you watched members of the royal family sniggering at the sight of every black persons that participated in your wedding?
2. Why do you think that the queen gave you a home that had never housed a royal and only ever been populated by servants?
3. Why was there so much effort from staff, William and Charles to ensure you never be seen in royal jewellery?
4. Have you been bothered that the Royal Family full their homes with jewelry, paintings & furniture that depict black people in positions of servitude.
I can understand why megxits like Kayla & Tori are trying 2 distance themselves from certain members of their crew.
Seeing royal twitter called out so directly must have been a jarring reminder of their persistent conundrum- “Is it still a good idea 2 attack & undermine Meghan?”
On the one hand royal megxit twitter could maintain the incessant bashing & harassment of everyone & every thing linked 2 Meghan, but they’re realising that it’s having the unwanted effect of sullying the royal family, who lets face it, already have a major image crisis at the mo
They could also ignore her & focus on their faves, but Meghan’s increasing involvement in high profile, A list events does nothing to quell their fears of their faves(Will & Kate) being “overshadowed” which if Cambridge fans are 2b believed, is a fate worse than death 4 royals😅
I’ve followed #MeghanMarkle story 4 about 2 years & read so many column inches, but realised today that I’ve hardly seen any of the video from her detractors.
Mainly cos I don’t watch that type of tv & also cos I don’t want 2 give them clicks, but 2day I fell down a rabbit hole
First clip was a pre-wedding Carole Malone (no snitch tagging!!) who has recently stated there are no parallels btwn Meghan & Diana...loudly proclaiming that there r MAJOR parallels between Meghan & Diana. She also states tht there’s no way Meghan can knw what’s in store for her
Carole was right, the critique came thick and fast. She hugged 2 much & bare legged. She ate avocados, her traditional royal wedding flowers were part of a murder plot, experts predicted she would neglect her husband 4 her son etc...the media called it “constructive criticism”🙃
Some1 critcised Meghan recently 4 not bringing enough “old-world glamour” 2 her looks. The idea being that royals dress with the past in mind.
As people have a tendency 2 rewrite history in order 2 pile on Meghan, thght we’d look at a little Royal history, our subject- The Queen
The Queen is in her 20’s here. She’s dressed in the classic 40’s style. An hourglass silhouette with feminine details, contrasted by pronounced almost masculine shoulders. The look says (in the parlance of the time), that she’s a swell gal, but she means business😜
It’s the 1950’s & QE2 is in her 30’s. The war is behind her & the nation craves luxury after years of rationing. Woman have left the factories & are back in the home. The masculine shoulders have been replaced by the smooth décolleté, & voluptuous femininity is the look du jour.