Share this page!

AG Profile picture
Twitter logo
7 Dec, 4 tweets, 2 min read
Brutal.

Sidney Powell's Michigan lawsuit gets destroyed.

You can expect something similar for the versions in other states this week.
The Judge catches on to the fact that the plaintiffs obviously know these cases aren't actually winnable, which means they are bringing them just to make the accusations without proving them to fool people into thinking they are legitimate. Image
Second Powell lawsuit dismissed today:
It’s not just that Powell is losing these cases, but they are being lost in such overwhelming fashion. Judges can toss it out for any of these reasons, but they are citing every reason available (mootness, lack of standing, lateness, no realistic remedy, lack of merit etc).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with AG

AG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AGHamilton29

AG Profile picture
7 Dec
I keep getting this response from some people. I’m just pointing out conspiracies are increasingly common. As for level, a few months ago a ton of elected Dems, media outlets, and pundits coordinated to promote a baseless conspiracy that Trump was using USPS to steal the election
Here is a useful thread from @DrewHolden360 as a useful reminder of how widespread this conspiracy got:
My favorite were the comparisons to watergate.

Here were a few of my threads at the time debunking the conspiracy:



Read 5 tweets
AG Profile picture
4 Dec
There were exactly 0 precincts in MI with 100% or over 100% turnout. This is an easily verifiable fact as the precinct data is available by County. The guy testifying did this repeatedly. He pretended to be giving intelligent data while saying things that are clearly false.
If someone is willing to lie to you about something that is that easy to verify, why would you pay attention to anything else that they say?
Here was another great one from this “expert”. He pretends to do this complicated analysis showing that machines couldn’t possibly count as many ballots as were reported over a short time relying on audience not knowing those counties reported absentee ballots in batches.
Read 4 tweets
AG Profile picture
3 Dec
Hilarious. My mentions kept telling me to tune in to the MI Rudy hearing because they had an expert proving the conspiracy. I tune in and some guy BSing with several conspiracies about Dominion that sound super intelligent if you know nothing about the actual topic (40M etc,)
so then one Rep intelligently asks the obvious question: wouldn't a hand recount prove whether the software change ballots?

So OF COURSE, the "expert" then suggested a new conspiracy that they cd have also put in fake paper ballots to match the software change.
Just watch this video of one of the main witnesses at the MI Guliani hearing hysterically ranting about complete nonsense as a Republican legislator tries to ask her a question:
Read 5 tweets
AG Profile picture
1 Dec
This is the second person she has done this to! newsweek.com/georgia-republ…

I have no idea how this whole fiasco doesn’t end with her losing her law license.
Omg. Powell asked the court in her WISCONSIN lawsuit to get her security camera footage from the location where they processed Detroit (Michigan) ballots. #HeadDesk
Crazy. This is such a blatant ethical violation.
Read 4 tweets
AG Profile picture
26 Nov
So I finally read the full SCOTUS opinion in the Catholic Diocese vs Cuomo case.

You can read it here, but just wanted to make a few comments.

supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
1) I think Roberts has taken a bit of unfair beating on Twitter. He seems to agree with the majority that Cuomo likely violated 1st amendment and temporary relief would be appropriate but argues it's moot since Cuomo already changed his restrictions.
The other conservatives on the bench argue they needed to take action now anyway because there is the constant threat that Cuomo could reimpose the restrictions and they shouldn't have to come back to stop him. That's not a substantive disagreement on whether Cuomo was wrong.
Read 4 tweets
AG Profile picture
26 Nov
This is a good example of how Giuliani spreads nonsense and other people pick it up.

1) The state you are talking about is PA, not GA.

2) The 1.8 million was the number of mail-in ballots just Dems had requested by mid-October.
When they are lying about something that is this easy to look up/check, why would you take their other claims seriously?
Here is an AP article from late October showing over 3 million absentee ballots had been requested by that point: apnews.com/article/electi…

Here is Rudy making the easily debunked claim at the PA meeting:
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @AGHamilton29 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @AGHamilton29!

Read all threads by @AGHamilton29