1\
Thanks to @FOOL_NELSON & @walkafyre for this podcast. I listened to both parts, twice.
Unless you've REALLy been on top of the whole "Phil" situation, then you probably need to listen to this understand Fool's original thread.
Thanks to @FOOL_NELSON & @walkafyre for this podcast. I listened to both parts, twice.
Unless you've REALLy been on top of the whole "Phil" situation, then you probably need to listen to this understand Fool's original thread.
https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1335070633970061312
2\
They give the background on Marcy Wheeler's interactions with her source, "Phil," and the process by which Fool used to trick her into revealing his identity.
What they don't do is speculate much on what it all means.
They give the background on Marcy Wheeler's interactions with her source, "Phil," and the process by which Fool used to trick her into revealing his identity.
What they don't do is speculate much on what it all means.
3\
I believe walkafyre described the revelation of Phil's identity as a one dot. Just a starting point.
So with that in mind, there are a couple of points that came to mind after m initial listen.
I believe walkafyre described the revelation of Phil's identity as a one dot. Just a starting point.
So with that in mind, there are a couple of points that came to mind after m initial listen.
4\
The bait that Fool used to hook Wheeler is a post that expressed his satisfaction that Mike Flynn would never work in gov again.
So we can infer that "Phil" aka Michael Adams demonstrated anti-Flynn sentiments in his interactions with Wheeler.
The bait that Fool used to hook Wheeler is a post that expressed his satisfaction that Mike Flynn would never work in gov again.
So we can infer that "Phil" aka Michael Adams demonstrated anti-Flynn sentiments in his interactions with Wheeler.
https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1333905839904714753
5\
Fool asked Craig Murray, a wikileaks operative who claims to have met with a whisteblower behind the release of the Podesta emails, if he had met "Phil."
Murray didn't answer affirmatively, but he definitely didn't deny it either.
Fool asked Craig Murray, a wikileaks operative who claims to have met with a whisteblower behind the release of the Podesta emails, if he had met "Phil."
Murray didn't answer affirmatively, but he definitely didn't deny it either.
https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1334242695997485066
6\
In an interview, Murray claims the leaker(s) were motivated by disgust with Hillary Clinton.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4…
In an interview, Murray claims the leaker(s) were motivated by disgust with Hillary Clinton.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4…
7\
It seems a bit counterintuitive that someone who hated Flynn would also be motivated to release damaging information about Hillary Clinton.
It seems a bit counterintuitive that someone who hated Flynn would also be motivated to release damaging information about Hillary Clinton.
8\
While it's quite possible that someone could hate both of Flynn and Clinton, surely whoever leaked the Podesta emails knew it could possibly swing the election in favor ot Trump.
So what's the game here?
While it's quite possible that someone could hate both of Flynn and Clinton, surely whoever leaked the Podesta emails knew it could possibly swing the election in favor ot Trump.
So what's the game here?
9\
There are many aspects of the podcast that may strike others as more salient. That's just my initial reaction. A starting point.
There are many aspects of the podcast that may strike others as more salient. That's just my initial reaction. A starting point.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
