“[Warner Bros] had a decades-long legacy as being known as the most talent-friendly studio. Now [they've] gone from that to a studio that in starburst colors lit up a sign that says, 'We don’t give a fuck about talent.’” - Anonymous
The most eyebrow-raising detail in the THR piece is the implication that WB was partly motivated by seeing their 2021 slate as a money-loser even without the pandemic, as it's hard to argue with: Apart from WW84, they had a lot of movie *I* was excited for... but iffy prospects?
Like... I *loved* "KING OF THE MONSTERS," but audiences didn't turn out for it and if "GODZILLA VS KONG" hadn't already been in production would that even have been *made* in the form it was? "SUICIDE SQUAD" is an apology/do-over sequel to a failure, "DUNE" is a dice-roll...
...i.e. it's a Prestige Product for the brand and *maybe* also this is the Villeneuve project that finally makes money? Out of everything, "SPACE JAM 2" and "TOM & JERRY" are the surest bets because they're family movies, honestly. And "MANY SAINTS OF NEWARK" because nostalgia.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I feel like the key people are missing in the #SpiderMan3 stuff is they confirmed Doctor Strange before anyone else. That means you could conceivably start the story off in any kind of weird/off status quo because eventually a wizard is going to show up and say...
..."yeah actually you're in the wrong reality because of weird shit that happened in my movie and that TV show. See, here's two other you's - this kind of took some looking."
New Prediction: They'll do the "Everyone loves Spider-Man!"-verse HOUSE OF M for the fake one 😏
i.e. give Holland's Peter the "best case scenario" version of the life he'd want (Mysterio thing solved, everyone loves him, basically the new Iron Man, regularly throttles villains) ...until: "Sorry, this is all fake - to win, you have to go back to your Life Sucks reality."