▪️ White Women Vote Republican. Get Used To It, Democrats.
▪️ Why Do White Women Keep Voting for the GOP and Against Their Own Interests?
▪️ White Women, Come Get Your People
Big yikes on the underlying political reasoning here.
These headlines, and countless ones like them, are suggestive of a consolidated demographic bloc, of an electoral monolith. But of course that's not the case at all.
For both conceptual and empirical reasons, the right takeaway is white women are *not* an electoral monolith.
Conceptually because in a political system like ours, and in a country our size, it is very rare to see a demographic group become so overwhelmingly partisan that it can fruitfully be described as a monolith.
It does happen, but it’s the exception.
Our identities are multifaceted things, and it's unlikely, in our political system, for us to see one of those layers—or, in this case, a combo of those layers: white womanhood—overwhelm all the others and optimize a demographic category into a flawlessly unified political bloc.
Even a trend across multiple elections doesn't tell us much. The very fact and frequency of our recurring elections means parties have ongoing opportunities to win over voters. Doesn't make sense to politically fix a demographic group in a sort of final and settled way.
But also empirically because Trump will likely end up winning white women by 10 or so points.
No matter what has happened historically, those margins are low enough to suggest a gettable group and obviously justify aggressive outreach for 2022 and beyond.
As @jonathanchait pointed out in this piece, since demographic groups are not "winner take all," there is no sense in candidates or parties treating them the way they treat states.
For a useful contrast, Biden won black women by 80 points. To be sure, as a share of the electorate, white women are a far larger group. But the monolith talk has to do with *consolidation*, not with *total share of the vote*.
A fatal flaw of this argument is it relies on a decades-old conception of the media and technology—one where conservatives can't broadcast their ideas because they lack access to channels of information—to absolve conservative media of its failures today.
By exclusively pinning this on "corporate media" and "Silicon Valley," Cortes is describing an informational landscape dominated by elements hostile to Trumpism. A landscape in which the truth gets choked out by mechanism inhospitable to the truth.
But he's obscuring something.
It's an absurd fiction to suggest right-wing media doesn't have remarkable and far-reaching influence in the information landscape.
Cortes wants to insulate conservative media—which includes people like him—from blame, but this problem is partly of their own making.
We cannot let anyone this fanatically unhinged near the presidency ever again.
Thankfully, the America First galaxy chuds, all of them exemplars of selfcuckery, are training their guns on the GOP. The best outcome would be a splintering of the hard right so that the MAGA coalition permanently bursts. We’ll see. Support these patriots in criticizing the GOP!
It is difficult to overstate how brazenly villainous the GOP has become in its pursuit of electoral larceny. It's one thing to offer a pretense of responsible civic action—what we have here instead is 18 red states saying, "Look, we simply don't want votes for Biden to count."
They won’t succeed, though the fact that they’re even trying is scandalous in itself. The fact that they’ve gotten this far, the fact that our reps have materially boosted this effort despite the damage it's doing to our social fabric transcends scandal. It's seditious debasement
The 18 states aren't offering an elaborate argument about hacked voting systems or whatever. Their ask is depressingly simple: that the Court invalidate the votes of 4 states—by pure coincidence, the 4 are crucial to Biden’s victory—because these states expanded mail-in voting.
Some people argue that because (1) Trump is incompetent, and (2) our institutions are durable, it means that, even though (3) Trump tried to steal the election, (4) our pre- and post-election fears of election theft are unjustified.
While it's true that Trump himself is incapable of pulling off a sophisticated steal, he sits at the helm of a political superstructure that is professionally and financially incentivized by his winning reelection.
I understand—and agree with—having faith in our institutions.
But I don't get how anyone with a basic respect for the allurement of political power could watch what Trump has tried to do and still conclude, "Well, *obviously* America's guardrails were always going to hold."