People say 'What's there in a name?'

A lot, when it comes to history.

This is story of a man called Radhanath Sikdar, a mathematician from West Bengal.

#wednesdaythought #Everest #Story
Sikdar worked as 'the Chief Computer' while working on The Great Trigonometrical Survey of India in 18th century. He could precisely calculate height of mountains using rudimentary instruments.
This was when most of the world considered Kangchenjunga as the tallest mountain.
In the year 1852, while mapping different Himalayan peaks, Sikdhar came across a very tall mountain. He recorded the height to be 8839 mtrs, making it the tallest mountain.
It is important to note that this peak already had a name in Nepalese, Sagar Matha. Tibetans called it Chomo Lungma.
Sir George Everest was a former in-charge of the survey and had retired by then. When Sikdar reported about the tallest mountain, the current in-charge of the survey, named it as Mount Everest as he considered George Everest his mentor.
Since then, in all the publications, references, documentaries, everywhere, this peak is mentioned by its name that was given in the year 1865, and not by the names which was associated with it for over thousand years.
Today, any layman would believe that person whose name was given to that mountain was associated with it, when in reality George Everest had never seen this peak in his life!

And that's why name matters, as it changes the history forever!
Hi, Please unroll
@threadreaderapp

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nimesh Desai

Nimesh Desai Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nimeshddesai

7 Dec
Why India has (only) 543 MPs? A thread -

After the first Lok Sabha election in 1952, number of MPs were 489, for a country with the population of 38 cr.
Over the time, number of constituencies were increased as per growing population and ultimately the number reached 543.
By this time, Lok Sabha of Parliament House, built in 1921, had become crowded due to growing number of MPs.

What is the solution?
Someone suggested to freeze the number at 543 so that there is no need to accommodate more people. Through subsequent amendments, in 1976 and then in 2001, Lok Sabha seats were frozen at 543 till 2026.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!