I do find it somewhat interesting that the fights over what everyone looks like in the Biden Cabinet are taking up far, far more space than what they actually believe or what they will actually do. I guess, like, does anyone actually care about the latter?
This is not me complaining really; I do believe the administration should look like America. But the conversation is all "X group says they are being underrepresented" and absolutely nothing on "this policy position is not being taken seriously." At least in the media.
I mean, all policies are identity politics and that very, very much includes class-based politics. But this is turning into a parody of how the right sees Democrats.
For example, I have no opinion at all who would make the better Secretary of Defense. But the entire discussion is "women are angry" and "the Black community celebrates the 1st Black SOD." OK, I get that. But between the two, I'd rather have the one who is going to better at it.
I also realize there is absolutely no upside for a white male academic bringing these things up. But when did I let nothing but downside stop me? I do think there's a conversation worth having here about what this all means for policy or whether anyone even cares about policy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This Day in Labor History: December 14, 1945. The House passed what would become the Employment Act of 1946 once Harry Truman signed it. Let's talk about this watered down legislation and how real full employment policy has always been a tough fight in America!
World War II ended the Great Depression. But policymakers knew that the war would end and they didn’t know what would happen to the economy. There was disagreement over the extent to which the underlying factors that led to the Depression had dissipated.
Many economists believed that the Great Depression was the natural state of a mature economy and would return without significant government intervention. This was a serious concern as the war ended, with widespread fears of a massive economic downturn.
This Day in Labor History: December 12, 1957. The AFL-CIO evicted four unions from the federation for corruption, most notably the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Let's talk about corruption in unions, which is unfortunately a plague of all power, not just unions.
There’s certainly nothing special about labor unions in this way except that corporate corruption is dealt with through hand slaps or ignored or even celebrated while union corruption brings down the federal government in harsh ways.
This is a reflection of the nation’s pro-corporate ideology. But corruption in unions is an unquestionably awful thing. As early as the 1920s, there were investigations of corruption in some New York building trade unions.
This Day in Labor History: December 11, 1886. The Colored Farmers’ Alliance was established in Lovelady in Houston County, Texas. It represented the brave attempt of black farmers to avoid tenancy, sharecropping, and other forms of white controlled labor. Let's talk about it!
The Farmers Alliance itself, an organization formed to speak to the very real concerns of increasing poverty and economic marginalization of southern farmers within the burgeoning industrial capitalist world, could not be a truly integrated organization.
The reality of segregation and racism were too much for that. What's important here is not overstate the racial alliance between white and Black farmers in the Alliances. It was extremely limited and we should not think of it as a history of interracial cooperation. It was not.
This Day in Labor History: December 10, 1789. Moses Brown, a Rhode Island businessman, hired Samuel Slater to build an English-style factory in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. This began the Industrial Revolution in the United States. Let's talk about its impact on workers!
Samuel Slater was a farmer’s son in England who started working in an early cotton mill in 1778 at the age of 10. At the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, there was room for fast learners to rise rapidly.
Slater became close to the mill’s owner, who trained him in its various workings. As the British developed this mill technology, it sought to protect its advantages by banning the transporting of this knowledge outside of its borders.
I completely fail to see what Tom Perez's role as DNC chair has to do with his ability to be AG. On the other hand, he was the most effective Secretary of Labor since Arthur Goldberg, if not Frances Perkins.
The ability of the Twitter left to turn any DNC chair into The Worst Person in History without even understanding the basic outlines of the role constantly makes me shake my head.
I have no particular opinion on whether Perez should or should not be AG. There are a number of quality candidates. But the idea that he is some particularly bad person because of Berniestan politics is ridiculous. Moreover, Bernie will totally support him!
This Day in Labor History: December 6, 1865. Georgia ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, ending slavery. Arguably, the single most important event in the history of American labor, the official end to slavery closed a chapter in the nation’s race-based labor system!
On the other hand, the 13th Amendment only ended one form of the race-based labor system, which still has tremendous power today, including in the prisons.
Let us the review the general outlines of what slavery meant–the right of the employer to do whatever they want with labor. Kill it. Rape it. Impregnate it and own the offspring. Beat it. Gamble it away. Dehumanize it. Whatever. It’s all open game when labor becomes property.