This Day in Labor History: December 10, 1789. Moses Brown, a Rhode Island businessman, hired Samuel Slater to build an English-style factory in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. This began the Industrial Revolution in the United States. Let's talk about its impact on workers! Image
Samuel Slater was a farmer’s son in England who started working in an early cotton mill in 1778 at the age of 10. At the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, there was room for fast learners to rise rapidly.
Slater became close to the mill’s owner, who trained him in its various workings. As the British developed this mill technology, it sought to protect its advantages by banning the transporting of this knowledge outside of its borders.
But Slater had a great memory. Once he knew how the mill ran, he decided to go to the United States to make his fortune in that new nation.
Moses Brown was a Rhode Island businessman who decided to start a spinning factory in Pawtucket along with other members of his family. They wanted to use the Arkwright system developed in England but could not figure out how to operate the technology.
Hearing of this, Samuel Slater, who had just arrived in New York looking for an opportunity to build his own mill, offered his services. The contract between Slater and Brown combined the former’s technological skills with the latter’s money. It made both of them very wealthy.
Slater began constructing his new factory in early 1790. By December, it was partially operational, with about 10 employees. In 1793, the factory opened in full. Slater then used his own education to train the new mechanics in how to operate these industrial machines.
Slater relied very heavily on child labor, again borrowing from his own personal life. Given the close-knit New England family economy, this was not a particularly difficult transition to make. Slater soon split from his original partners, opening mills in southern New England.
This, along with the invention of the cotton gin in 1793, transformed the New England and broader American economy. The cotton gin drastically reduced the labor necessary in the cotton mills, allowing for more spinning and thus higher production rates.
The British held most of the world’s spinning production during these years but the growth of American industry was spurred by the tensions with the British during the Early Republic, including Jefferson’s Embargo of 1807 and 1808 and the War of 1812, lasting until early 1815.
By 1815, there were 140 mills within 30 miles of Providence, employing 26,000 people.
The growth of this industry made Americans nervous, for they feared the Dickensian industrial cities of Britain. Slater built his own company town, Slatersville, that attempted to create a ruralesque village around a factory.
It included a company store and tenement housing for workers. These concerns also led to experimental towns like Lowell which would allow American industry to grow while retaining its fundamentally rural values.
But growing competition undermined Lowell, creating some of the first strikes in the United States and eventually leading to the importation of largely Irish labor to replace the native-born women in those factories.
The awful conditions of British cities would indeed be replicated in the United States, with social problems and unrest that would mark American industry through the New Deal unionization of the industrial workforce.
The rise of factory work would transform American labor.
While this could not be predicted in 1789 or 1793, a process begun that brought Americans in from the fields to the factories, from the farms to the cities, and from relative control over their own labor to an increasingly centralized and deskilling work under control of managers
For decades after Slater’s Mill opened, Americans primarily believed that in the principle of controlling their own labor, whether in urban shops or on farms, with large-scale factory labor something of an afterthought or something that could be done by the Irish.
But in fact, it, and the profits it engendered in the hands of the very, very few, would come to define American work and create the proletariatization of the working class.
It would lead to rapid advances in transportation technology, including the canals of the 1820s and the beginning of the railroads by the late 1830s.
And it would create a new legal regime that would allow an ideal of “progress” to run roughshod over the rights of workers or property owners.
Mill owners demanded the right to dam rivers in order to power the mills, even if it caused erosion to farms upstream or ended shad runs that interior communities relied on for both food and trade. Courts said OK.
The also demanded the right to not take responsibility for workers’ getting hurt on the job, which Massachusetts would encode in law in 1842 and would continue largely unchallenged by the American legal system until the early 20th century.
Samuel Slater died a millionaire in 1835, in an age when there were very few.
Back tomorrow with a discussion of the Colored Farmers Alliance.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erik Loomis

Erik Loomis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ErikLoomis

14 Dec
This Day in Labor History: December 14, 1945. The House passed what would become the Employment Act of 1946 once Harry Truman signed it. Let's talk about this watered down legislation and how real full employment policy has always been a tough fight in America! Image
World War II ended the Great Depression. But policymakers knew that the war would end and they didn’t know what would happen to the economy. There was disagreement over the extent to which the underlying factors that led to the Depression had dissipated.
Many economists believed that the Great Depression was the natural state of a mature economy and would return without significant government intervention. This was a serious concern as the war ended, with widespread fears of a massive economic downturn.
Read 34 tweets
12 Dec
This Day in Labor History: December 12, 1957. The AFL-CIO evicted four unions from the federation for corruption, most notably the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Let's talk about corruption in unions, which is unfortunately a plague of all power, not just unions.
There’s certainly nothing special about labor unions in this way except that corporate corruption is dealt with through hand slaps or ignored or even celebrated while union corruption brings down the federal government in harsh ways.
This is a reflection of the nation’s pro-corporate ideology. But corruption in unions is an unquestionably awful thing. As early as the 1920s, there were investigations of corruption in some New York building trade unions.
Read 29 tweets
11 Dec
This Day in Labor History: December 11, 1886. The Colored Farmers’ Alliance was established in Lovelady in Houston County, Texas. It represented the brave attempt of black farmers to avoid tenancy, sharecropping, and other forms of white controlled labor. Let's talk about it!
The Farmers Alliance itself, an organization formed to speak to the very real concerns of increasing poverty and economic marginalization of southern farmers within the burgeoning industrial capitalist world, could not be a truly integrated organization.
The reality of segregation and racism were too much for that. What's important here is not overstate the racial alliance between white and Black farmers in the Alliances. It was extremely limited and we should not think of it as a history of interracial cooperation. It was not.
Read 34 tweets
9 Dec
I do find it somewhat interesting that the fights over what everyone looks like in the Biden Cabinet are taking up far, far more space than what they actually believe or what they will actually do. I guess, like, does anyone actually care about the latter?
This is not me complaining really; I do believe the administration should look like America. But the conversation is all "X group says they are being underrepresented" and absolutely nothing on "this policy position is not being taken seriously." At least in the media.
I mean, all policies are identity politics and that very, very much includes class-based politics. But this is turning into a parody of how the right sees Democrats.
Read 5 tweets
6 Dec
I completely fail to see what Tom Perez's role as DNC chair has to do with his ability to be AG. On the other hand, he was the most effective Secretary of Labor since Arthur Goldberg, if not Frances Perkins.
The ability of the Twitter left to turn any DNC chair into The Worst Person in History without even understanding the basic outlines of the role constantly makes me shake my head.
I have no particular opinion on whether Perez should or should not be AG. There are a number of quality candidates. But the idea that he is some particularly bad person because of Berniestan politics is ridiculous. Moreover, Bernie will totally support him!
Read 4 tweets
6 Dec
This Day in Labor History: December 6, 1865. Georgia ratified the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, ending slavery. Arguably, the single most important event in the history of American labor, the official end to slavery closed a chapter in the nation’s race-based labor system!
On the other hand, the 13th Amendment only ended one form of the race-based labor system, which still has tremendous power today, including in the prisons.
Let us the review the general outlines of what slavery meant–the right of the employer to do whatever they want with labor. Kill it. Rape it. Impregnate it and own the offspring. Beat it. Gamble it away. Dehumanize it. Whatever. It’s all open game when labor becomes property.
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!