This is a great episode of @yourewrongabout, about misinformation, why it ends up affecting older people the most/worst, and why the bulk of it comes from the right. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/los…
One of the grimmest conclusions of the research (which I'm glad Michael highlighted) is that once people are convinced of loopy conspiracy theories, it is almost impossible to talk them out of it. The only way to prevent misinfo from spreading is to prevent exposure.
But how do you prevent exposure? The only way is to have trusted institutions that you can rely on to vet information ("gatekeepers," as I said the other day to much outrage) before it's "out there." Michael gestures at putting more responsibility on the social media cos ...
... but I really don't think that's going to work. They are market actors; they profit from the very stuff they're supposed to be vetting. In my view, there's no way around the need for restoring social trust in the institutions we built for this very task!
Journalism. Science. Academia. We built these as truth-seeking & information-vetting institutions. Yes, they all have their flaws, but the 60+ year conservative quest to destroy trust in them has shown what will replace them: nothing. Chaos. And eventually authoritarianism.
If progressives ever want to see...progress, they can't just build their own propaganda machine, a mirror image of Fox et al. Progressive change *depends on trusted institutions*, governed by law & principle, transparent & accountable. It depends on social solidarity.
It's fine to criticize institutions & protest when they become captured by a class or clique, but the whole "burn it down" shtick is a dead end for the left. Chaos is a ladder for the ruthless & powerful; only fact-based, law-bound society can offer a ladder for the downtrodden.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

12 Dec
I've got other things I ought to be doing ... so how about a thread?

When I talk about what contemporary US conservatives are doing (to wit: being f'ing horrible), I'm frequently told, "don't call them conservatives. They are fascists/thugs/racists/etc." Let's talk about that.
The impulse behind the response is to separate what people think of as philosophical conservatism -- small gov't, strong defense, traditional values -- from the kind of incoherent morass of resentments & cruelties we see on the right today.
But that's the wrong way to think about it. The nationalism, anti-intellectualism, xenophobia, resentment, cruelty, & lust for authoritarianism did not, at some point, displace conservatism. They are simply what conservatism becomes in the face of demographic change.
Read 15 tweets
7 Dec
Some personal news! Friday was my last day at Vox. Today I'm launching a newsletter called Volts, devoted to my twin passions: clean energy and politics. (And I am now, yes, drvolts.)

Drop by to learn more and subscribe! volts.wtf/p/welcome-to-v…
No, I was not canceled! I do not view editing as tyranny. I'm not fleeing groupthink. I had nothing but positive experiences at @Vox, remain an avid reader, & will be contributing to it regularly going forward. It is growing & expanding & has an *incredible* bench of talent.
It's time for me to be my own boss, pursue my own weird obsessions, and best of all, build a community of people who share those obsessions. I am so excited to get back to the freewheeling spirit of blogging, with more room for experiments, speculation, & conversation.
Read 6 tweets
3 Dec
Don't miss this chipper @JaxAlemany piece about the bright political future ahead for the daughter of an aspiring despot, who got to the WH through nepotism & has accomplished nothing in 4 years but eliciting fawning profiles from gullible journalists. washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
"I think she's impressive and most people see she's impressive and if she wants to stay involved with politics, people will take her with open arms." For this searing insight, a "former White House official" was granted anonymity.
To imagine Ivanka Trump "impressive," one has to find being a soft-spoken, physically attractive white lady impressive *in & of itself*. It's like performance art: how minimal in substance & accomplishment can a white lady be & still be deemed impressive by white men? Very!
Read 4 tweets
30 Nov
I was just reminded that technically I'm still on vacation for two more days. Based on that info, should I:
All right, I have heard your counsel, and I am ignoring it. Instead, here's another thread on carbon capture & sequestration. (I know this gets tedious, feel free to mute me, but I'm determined to articulate this properly so I shall keep trying.)
THREAD:

As I see it, the primary job of decarbonization is electrification. See the work of Saul Griffith & the folks at @rewiringamerica: vox.com/energy-and-env…
Read 19 tweets
29 Nov
Negative emissions technologies (NETs) are absolutely serving as a permission structure to continue emitting GHGs. Just as CCS subsidies in the US will serve as a permission structure to continue politics/business as usual.
All right fine a quick thread on this. The main job of reducing emissions is substituting clean techs for their dirty counterparts -- techs that produce the same goods & services, w/out the CO2 emissions. Some of those alternatives are mature & cheaper already (RE) ...
... while some are at the demonstration or even lab phase. But *even the techs that are mature & cheaper* are proving a challenge to substitute fast enough, because of politics. Again: we're having trouble *substituting something cleaner & cheaper* for the same work.
Read 14 tweets
28 Nov
Extremely feeling this and the entire rant that precedes it. I don't think Tom is fluent in Woke, but the phenomena he's talking about here have names: white innocence & white fragility. Patterns of behavior & rhetoric familiar from, eg, Confederate states in the runup to the CW.
It's always the same. No matter how much cruelty & suffering they impose, however unjust the cultures they build, they are always the victims -- of misunderstanding, of condescension -- and it is always everyone else who's obliged to "reach out" & understand them better.
That's the dumbest part of it. "We need to understand Trump voters better." Guess what? They aren't that fucking complicated! They've told us, through their words & behavior, what motivates them. It's a group dynamic as old as humanity; it dominates US history. We get it!
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!