Today is #HumanRightsDay - the 72nd anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.
It’s been a tough year everywhere but I believe that if we focus on dignity, liberty and equality our societies will do better even against the worst threats
What is the Universal Declaration if Human Rights (video from 3 years ago)
Even as we speak on #HumanRightsDay this government is trying to water down the human rights protections we all have via the Human Rights Act. We must not let this happen
It’s important to remember that no government ever argues against declarations of rights - they worry when citizens can *claim* rights through laws like the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act.
Here is my thread on Coronavirus and human rights where I try to figure out what a human rights response to the pandemic is #HumanRightsDay
A year ago, the idea that you could close every restaurant, café and pub in the capital without a Parliamentary vote or even a debate would have been unthinkable. Today we have allowed government by executive decree and it now seems normal. Covid lawmaking has corroded democracy
To explain: since March, the government has used the Public Health (Control of Diseases) Act 1984 to pass lockdown laws - over 60 (I have listed them here docs.google.com/document/d/1ne…).
The lockdown laws have imposed stringent restrictions on movement, freedom of association, family life, religion etc. But each and every lockdown law passed has used the super emergency procedure which allows the government to pass them without a parliamentary vote for 28 days
I have been a consistent critic of the way the government has enacted Covid regulations but the analogy to Nazi Germany is (as it often is) wrong, an over-exaggeration and undermines the civil liberties arguments about lockdown regulations.
I too am troubled by aspects of the courts' approach - particularly allowing the govt to wriggle away from challenges because they have enacted new regulations. But parliament is now given a vote on all major regulations....
There has been at least one successful challenge to Covid regulations (bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/…). We have a functioning but flawed democratic process including Parliamentary committees and votes.
I am told that this “legal advice“ has been handed out to thousands of people in the ultra orthodox Jewish community. It should not be followed. It is riddled with errors. It will lead people to getting £10,000 fines and worse
I will explain the problems with it later as I am about to go into a meeting but if people from the ultra orthodox community want to email me I should be able to provide help without charge
I don't really know where to start with this. A few big things:
- The advice on "gatherings/simchas" is wrong as it doesn't mention a key requirement which is that in all Tiers guests are not permitted to mingle (Tier 1 groups of 6 and Tiers 2 and 3 not at all).
I'm so proud of the @EachOtherUk team for producing their first full length (45 min) documentary on a vital human rights issue: school exclusions.
Exclusions raise profound human rights issues, little talked about
Watch Exclusion now & spread the word:
A project which gets to the heart of what @EachOtherUk is doing, great for #HumanRightsDay:
- Foregrounds voices of those whose human rights are affected (the entire 45 mins is young people's voices)
- Engages with wider human rights values & campaigns
All of this is in the context that the current government is trying to pass a law which would make prosecuting war crimes of more than 5 years old much more difficult - see my podcast with @davidallengreen and @SonyaSceatsanchor.fm/better-human/e…
In short, investigation closed as ICC has no jurisdiction to investigate where state authorities have genuinely been willing to carry out relevant investigations and/or prosecutions and decisions not to prosecute were not because state was unwilling...
BUT still plenty of troubling reading in this report:
"preliminary examination has found that there is a reasonable basis to believe that various forms of abuse were committed by members of UK armed forces against Iraqi civilians in detention"...