There’s been a ton of development in the Yearn ecosystem recently to the point where it’s worth asking again:

What the hell is Yearn?

@jotto and I did a deep dive into the theory of Yearn to breakdown what Yearn is and where it’s going.

1/
It all starts with the theory of the protocol.

Protocols are coordination mechanisms that define rules and provide incentives for market participants to facilitate economic activity at a global scale.

messari.io/article/the-th…
The second building block to understand Yearn is to understand a key premise of DeFi:

DeFi provides individuals unprecedented access to financial opportunities traditionally reserved for HNW individuals and regulated financial institutions.
But the challenge with this freedom is that finance can oftentimes be very complex and with so many opportunities it may be hard for people to decide what to do.

So Yearn fundamentally asks, “what would a crypto-native 21st century wealth management solution look like?”
It would not look like a plain vanilla savings bank where people deposit their money to a firm, which then uses that money to generate a return - the bank's shareholders reaping the lump sum of the value created.
Nor would it look like a modern wealth management app that is also extractive, beholden to local regulators and limited in its functionality.
Instead it would be a globally accessible, fully transparent, minimally extractive, and credibly neutral protocol that would provide the majority of value created back to users.

nakamoto.com/credible-neutr…
This protocol would just be a coordinator between capital allocators and capital providers.

And it would provide easy access to and automated management for every financial opportunity available on Ethereum (or any blockchain for that matter).

This is what Yearn is at its core.
Yearn is a protocol for capital allocation.

It coordinates capital allocation through incentivizing capital providers with the highest possible yields, while incentivizing capital allocators (i.e. “strategists”) with the highest possible AUM to allocate.
But where exactly is Yearn going?

Yearn’s recent “mergers” with Pickle, Cream, SushiSwap, Akropolis, and Cover help illuminate Yearn’s masterplan.
Yearn’s recent mergers aren’t mergers in the traditional sense of acquiring assets and governance rights.

There will still be separate tokens, treasuries, and governance systems for these “merged” protocols.
Instead Yearn is merging developer talent across these protocols to more tightly coordinate roadmaps - an important part of scaling Yearn.
For example, Yearn’s plan to launch Deriswap on SushiSwap, has the potential to allow liquidity supplied to SushiSwap to be simultaneously used to facilitate trading, lending, options, and futures, increasing the yield per dollar of liquidity provided.
Increased capital efficiency is good for Yearn because it boosts the returns for its capital providers (vault depositors).
Yearn’s other mergers are aimed at achieving similar goals of scaling Yearn, whether it be insuring vaults (Cover), attracting institutional liquidity (Akropolis), acquiring strategists (Pickle), or building out an in-house money market (Cream).
What does this all mean?

In short while Yearn, the protocol, is a coordination mechanism for efficient capital allocation, Yearn, the ecosystem, aims to be a conglomerate of symbiotic financial protocols that increase the capital efficiency of DeFi as a whole.
The greater the capital efficiency in DeFi, the greater the opportunity for Yearn to scale its operations.

The name of the game for Yearn is to attract enough capital and enough capital allocators (strategists) to build a network effect.
At this point, Yearn would become the “shelling protocol” for capital allocation - everyone will coordinate around Yearn, and the incentives to defect to another protocol would be weak.
Yearn’s recent “mergers” are aimed at creating an ecosystem around Yearn to ensure Yearn becomes the schelling point for capital providers and capital allocators to coordinate around.
The cryptoeconomy is a new economy with new competitive dynamics.

Dive deeper into the theory of the Yearn to understand what the hell is going on 👇🏾
messari.io/article/the-th…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Watkins

Ryan Watkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RyanWatkins_

7 Dec
On Thursday I posted a proposal to the PowerPool community to create a Yearn Ecosystem Token Index (YETI).

One common question about the proposal was about CVP’s presence in the index.

TL;DR: CVP is an integral part of each PowerPool Index.

1/
CVP is included in each PowerPool index for two reasons.

The first is to enable index holders to participate in PowerPool governance.

Each index holder's voting power will be a function of their share of CVP locked in the index.

messari.io/article/unders…
Index token holders will be able to vote on all proposals and collect rewards using this CVP locked in the index.

For example each PIPT (PowerPool’s first index) holder's voting power will be a function of their share of the 12.5% of CVP in the PowerIndex pool.
Read 13 tweets
3 Dec
Proposal for Yearn Ecosystem Token Index (YETI) - a PowerPool index consisting of YFI, SUSHI, CREAM, AKRO, COVER, K3PR, CVP, PICKLE

YETI will create a simple vehicle to invest in Yearn’s ecosystem, while also coordinating governance among its protocols through meta-governance.
The index will serve two purposes.

For investors it would create a passive vehicle for broad exposure to the Yearn ecosystem - like an index on the Yearn conglomerate of protocols.
For Yearn it would be a way of formalizing its recent mergers, aligning the treasuries and governance systems of the protocols in its ecosystem.
Read 6 tweets
3 Dec
Ethereum often gets criticized for its “loose” monetary policy.

However after Phase 1.5 (ETH 1.x merge into ETH 2), it is likely ETH’s annual inflation rate will drop well below 1% if not 𝗻𝗲𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲.

At this point ETH’s inflation rate would be far lower than BTC’s.

1/ Image
If you’re an Ethereum skeptic you’re probably thinking “how is this possible?”

It all starts with Ethereum’s shift to Proof of Stake (PoS).
One of the core value propositions of PoS is that stakers are theoretically more willing to pay significantly higher capital costs per a dollar of rewards.

This is because they only face an opportunity cost on their investment and don’t experience any depreciation (like ASICs).
Read 14 tweets
2 Dec
ETH 2.0 transforms Ethereum the blockchain, but what about ETH the asset?

In ETH 1.x ETH is used as a money and commodity.

In ETH 2.0 ETH will also be used to produce income through staking.

The combination of the 3 will make ETH one of the most unique assets in crypto.

1/
Let’s start with ETH’s properties in ETH 1.x.

In ETH 1.x ETH possesses store of value properties through its use as collateral in DeFi and use as Ethereum’s native currency.
In ETH 1.x ETH possesses commodity properties through its use as “digital oil”, being used to pay for block space.

This analogy to oil will be especially powerful once EIP-1559 is implemented and the majority of tx fees are burned - literally converting ETH into block space.
Read 15 tweets
1 Dec
ETH 2.0 is finally here and will transform Ethereum as we know it.

But what is the philosophy underpinning ETH 2.0? And what is Ethereum building towards?

It all starts with the idea that Ethereum is the foundation of a social contract for the global economy.

1/
Ethereum is a global public good that is open, borderless, neutral, transparent, and censorship-resistant.

Ethereum provides a system of property rights, rules, and economic opportunity for anyone in the world with an internet connection.
With Ethereum users and builders are sovereign and able to determine their own economic destinies.

This is important in an age of declining trust in institutions where many people don’t have access to stable systems of property rights or economic opportunity.
Read 14 tweets
24 Nov
When I think of why so many people can't get comfortable with ETH as an asset, I think of Taleb's concept of a Procrustean Bed.

ETH doesn't fit into reductive categories or cookie cutter narratives - it's just different.

And that's fine, it highlights how unique ETH truly is.
Often times when people discuss what money is on here, they attempt to jam cryptocurrencies into some preconceived notion of what money is.

Isn't the whole point of all this that we're reinventing money, not simply digitizing it?

What money is, is changing.
Btw none of this is to say that we should throw all history and analytical models out the window.

This isn't a "Bubbles are mathematically impossible in this new paradigm" tweet.

Its just that old models may not be perfect for understanding what's going on here.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!