The Hunter Biden story broke two months ago. Most of the media ignored it or called it “Russian disinformation,” despite no evidence that it was.
Now that the election is over, the story, it seems, is fit to print.
Who’s up for a little before and after?
You’ll remember that one of the key players in all this was Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunters.
Well, you might not if you’ve only read @CNN. As of last night, they’d never mentioned him. But their homepage featured Hunter and China.
Funny, that.
And surely you’ll remember that @CNN had former DNI James Clapper on the program to say that the Post’s reporting - that blew the lid off of the Biden family corruption in the first place - was “classic textbook Soviet Russian tradecraft” back in October.
The richest may be @NPR. Back in October they didn’t say a peep about Hunter because - I kid you not - they “don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories.”
Apparently, now it’s a story.
@politico put out a piece back in October about how 50 “former senior intel officers” said it might be Russian disinfo, despite the entire American intel apparatus saying that was bunk.
Today they used the same picture of Hunter to report about...Hunter’s corruption.
Bonus on @politico. Reminder that, back in October, they quoted **a Biden advisor** to make the case that allegations against Hunter were Russian disinformation.
Not exactly Profiles In Courage stuff here.
One of the most egregious displays was @CBSNews, who got upset with one of their reporters for daring to ask about Hunter Biden in October (h/t @CarmineSabia) but, all of a sudden, see it as a valuable story a couple of months later.
I want to pause here to make something abundantly clear: the reason the Hunter story didn’t earn the attention it should have is because the media actively spread a conspiracy theory that it was Russian disinformation in the days leading up to the election. That’s it.
Anyway, back to your regularly scheduled programming. Here’s @NewsHour doing an about-face on Hunter’s impropriety with no recognition of how we got here.
You had to assume that @nytimes would find their way on here.
I almost appreciate the hustle from @MSNBC, who have continued to go to bat for Hunter through all of this, even if their tone has, well, changed a touch.
And it doesn’t look like their top talent - @JoyAnnReid and @maddow - have thought it important to revisit their earlier claims which weren’t exactly spot on.
Perhaps now would be a good time to update the fact check, @washingtonpost?
It’s interesting to see @USATODAY say that this news puts Hunter’s finances back in the spotlight when back in October the only “spotlight” they gave them was to call them Russian disinformation (wrongly).
Now, the media isn’t omniscient. We shouldn’t have expected they would know about the FBI investigation. That isn’t the problem.
The problem is the absolute absence of interest in this story. The media didn’t just ignore it. They actively undermined it.
I’ve got a whole separate thread on the Russian disinfo stuff, linked here. The allegations - which have since been shot through - were even more thinly sourced than the Hunter story. Yet TONS of outlets ran with them. Twitter and Facebook blackballed the piece.
But now, with the election in the rearview mirror, they’re interested in Hunter’s impropriety.
Where was this before? Where was this interest when Biden said during the debates that Hunter did everything aboveboard? The fact checkers were mysteriously absent from that one.
And of course the richest part of all this is that many of these outlets and individuals are the same people who pushed the idea that perhaps Donald Trump had been a Russian agent since the 1980s.
So I don’t want to hear it. This was bad faith all the way down, and it was done deliberately to not upset what these folks thought would be a surefire Biden win in the election.
It stinks to high heavens and we should all be outraged.
I’ll be honest guys I’m on vacation this week and then I saw the Hunter news and was like, well, can’t let this one pass by unremarked.
I don’t have anything to sell. But this is an enormously difficult moment for lots and lots of families. In your charity, and if you can, I think you should give to @foodbankmetrodc, particularly if you live near me. capitalareafoodbank.org
Many of us have a lot to be thankful for this year. A lot of our neighbors and our brothers and sisters in the faith don’t, particularly after what 2020 has been. If you can, this group is worth your trust. capitalareafoodbank.org
People often ask me on here how they can support my work. I don’t have a good answer. But lots of people are worth your money and your time, and I encourage you to find them instead. Starting with these guys: capitalareafoodbank.org
Guys, seriously. I put a lot of work & time & effort into this. I’m not on substack or anything. But if you can imagine I am - and that you would invest in it - please, do something of value. Capital area foodbank are & I can’t encourage you more to give: capitalareafoodbank.org
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Despite their homepage headline about Hunter Biden, a search for “Bobulinski,” the former business associate of Hunter who spoke out before the election about the Biden family’s shady dealings, still comes up empty at @CNN.
The guy who went on national television to blow the whistle about all of this *before* the election goes right down the memoryhole.
More of the same at @NPR. Bobulinski turns up three results - all about other Bobulinskis.
There is no mass voter fraud conspiracy, and the people claiming otherwise are mostly doing it to make a buck or get attention.
These claims have been laughed out of courts across the country and rejected by Trump’s own DOJ. The campaign has even distanced itself from Powell & co.
You’re being asked to believe the most outlandish, unbelievable story in American history.
There is no reason to believe it.
Others have made the “well how do YOU know that?!” case better than I’ll be able to. But this is just black helicopters/lizard people stuff at this point. Lots of you don’t want to hear that but need to.
I don't know why these stats don't matter to so many left-leaning thought leaders. The governors who consistently get plaudits - Cuomo, Murphy, now Raimondo - often have the worst records in addressing the coronavirus.
Minneapolis, ground zero of “defund the police,” is on pace for its 2nd highest annual murder rate this year.
The year-over-year increase alone (30, just through the first 11 months) is more than the *total* number of unarmed people in the city killed by police since 2000 (28).
Officer involved killings are tragic and complex. But the way that we talk about addressing them has become increasingly unmoored from the data, which is bad.
Today’s news about China’s poor and deceptive handling of the coronavirus outbreak should serve as a wake up call for those in the media who praised and defended it.
Because it’s a long, long list of those who served as an apologist for China’s response. 👇
Given @CNN broke the bad news today on China, it seems like a good place to start the list of those who vouched for them.
They carried water for China’s propaganda for months, and criticized @VP for rightly blaming their response for the global death toll.
Of all of @CNN’s people on the anti-Trump beat, it seems @jgriffiths was dedicated to covering for China in their response, and obfuscating the truth in criticism from Trump and others.