Hope Investors have realised futility of legal course. They have wasted 8 months and back to square one.
Please VOTE "YES" for winding up for your own good.
Do not get misguided by wrong narratives.
1/1
-Voting on Dec 26 to Dec 28
-Those who do not vote can vote during AGMs on 29th
-Reserve day on Dec 30
-Court Appointed Observer to oversee Voting
-Results will be sealed in an envelope and given to Hon SC
-Results will be announced in 3rd week of Jan
1/2
Do not wait to vote during AGMs on 29th December as the technology and Platforms may not be able to accommodate all Investors.
These platforms will have limited capacity for number of Investors at one go
1/3
-If majority says YES, accumulated funds (almost Rs.7200 crs) will be disbursed proportinately to Investors after following Court directives
-Balance funds will be disbursed as and when schemes receive them on sale of securities or on their maturities
1/4
If majority Votes NO
-there will be huge redemption pressure
-Fastest Finger First - method for disbursing redemptions
-Institutional Investors will benefit
-Retail Investors will suffer
-Balance securities will be sold at huge discounts
-remaining Investors will suffer
1/5
Retail Investors have been given narrative that they will lose right to prosecute if they Vote YES.
Wrong narrative being fed that there is misappropriation of funds by the AMC.
No such findings in any of the Court Rulings
1/6
Vote wisely. This is your last chance to recover your funds in an orderly fashion.
Voting YES is in the best interests of the Investors.
End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As @meetdharam has put it: Expensive Valuations:
Rs.100 in Debt @5% = 105/1 year
Equity corrects 50%
Cheap Valuation.
Switch from Debt to Equity
Rs.105
Markets go up 50% = Rs.157.50
Expensive Valutions
Rs.100 in Equity
Equity corrects 50% = Rs.50
Markets go up 50% = Rs.75
1st Investor protected downside, with no drawdowns. Started with a higher base of 105.
Switched to Equity & participated in full Upside of 50% rally thereafter
Final value Rs.157.50
2nd Investor held onto to Equity at Expensive valuations with 50% drawdown and no downside protection.
On corrections, value came down to Rs.50
Participated in 50% rally thereafter- but was only recouping his earlier losses
Let us do Role Play with #SEBI officials (SO) - they play the role of Investors and we of course are MFDs
SO 1) How much amt shd I invest? 2) Which Asset Class shd I invest? 3) For how long shd I invest? 4) Which AMC & Schemes shd I invest? 5) When shd I exit?
MFD response👇
MFD Response: 1) Spk with RIA 2) Search in Google 3) Search on Social Media
Following queries are compiled based on past experiences. Not to demean anyone. Just bear with the examples as they are only to showcase the futility of current MFD vs RIA notification.
An update by @FTIIndia . Do not believe unsubstantiated claims by unknown entities like CFMA.
By their own admission, none of their Members were Unit Holders of affected schemes. On what basis are they mis-guiding Investors and getting involved? Only Investors are suffering
When will Investors realise the futility of the legal path they are pursuing instead of letting the Fund House manage winding up of schemes and start repaying
It is visible for all to see that these schemes are now cash +ve with almost 8000 crs having been raised till now
Following these unknown entities who claim to be working in their interests is the biggest folly of Investors.
Wake up to reality, remove all legal cases, start receiving your funds and move on in life.
There is very heated debate on Low Cost vs High Cost, DITECT vs REGULAR etc. There are passionate views on both sides.
I was an Advisor till some time ago. No longer. So I have seen both sides of the coin. My thoughts on this debate:
There is No Black & White in any profession or business. Most models work at different times, for different people. Both can co-exist based on one's perception.
This debate and differentiation was created only post SEBI introducing DIRECT option in 2013. Till then the debate was Upfront vs Trail, High Expense vs Low Expense etc and no one doubted the importance of intermediaries in the Mutual Fund practice.