NEW: The fact @realDonaldTrump thinks his conservative judicial appointees will save him shows he doesn’t have a clue who they are or what they believe about the law, say former White House counsel officials and legal experts. independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
“That’s the opposite of what conservative justices are — that’s activist as fuck… wading into the three branches of government,” said one former White House counsel’s office attorney. independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
The former official, a veteran GOP lawyer, said @realDonaldTrump “continues to believe...because he was the one who nominated them and put them on the various levels of the federal court system, that they'll be more inclined to hear his side of the case.” independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
But Fordham Law School professor @jedshug said Trump’s faith in his appointees is misplaced: “His whole life has been transactions...and that’s a total misunderstanding of what to expect from the three justices he appointed.” independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
“They're not going to burn down their court to rescue Donald Trump… they're neither stupid nor crazy. And for them to do what Trump's asking them to do, they would have to be both stupid and crazy,” @jedshug said of the conservative SCOTUS majority. independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
And Harvard emeritus professor @tribelaw said he “wasn’t surprised that @realDonaldTrump has no idea what real judges do or how they at least try, if they have any integrity at all, to apply the law as they understand it to the facts in actual cases.” independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
But @tribelaw added that what surprises and distresses him “is that so many people loyal to Trump do seem to have been surprised and are ready to badmouth, or even threaten, judges who don’t conform to Trump’s misconception of the judicial role.” independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
“This seems like an integral part of the Trump-captured Republican Party’s rejection of the rule of law itself as a meaningful part of democracy and, sadly, an integral part of their rejection of the democratic idea altogether,” @tribelaw said. independent.co.uk/voices/trump-l…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Stephen Miller says Trump electors will be voting and sending results to Congress.
(They'll be worthless because they won't have the seals of the state Secretaries of State, though)
Miller is now repeating the false claims @realDonaldTrump made in a tweet last night about underage, non-citizen, and other illegal voters voting in swing states.
"We have open election challenges in all the contested states," Miller says.
(Courts have rejected all of their challenges. Every. Single One.)
I’ve had a @LinkedIn account since 2008. I have over 2100 connections. I have even paid for the “LinkedIn Premium” service.
I am also nearly 100% certain that the countless hours I’ve spent on LinkedIn in hopes that it would help me get hired somewhere has been a total waste.
NOW: @PressSec has opened her briefing by gloating about a SCOTUS opinion prohibiting churches from hosting large gatherings during a pandemic, and because she's a petty, unprofessional hack, is playing video of Democratic politicians and Chris Cuomo for...reasons.
.@PressSec, a taxpayer-funded spokesperson for the executive branch, is attacking the Governor of New York for commenting on the above-mentioned SCOTUS case.
Q: Does the President still think he has a path to win?
A: [incoherence about "legal votes"] and refers question to campaign she has been serving as a paid spokesperson for part-time.
NOW: @realDonaldTrump is on @FoxNews talking to @MariaBartiromo, claiming without evidence that leaders of other countries are calling him about the (not) "rigged" 2020 election.
.@realDonaldTrump is now repeating false claims about voting machines switching votes from him to @JoeBiden and claiming that there was "absolute fraud"
Trump now telling a "sir" story (meaning made-up) about how he received congratulatory calls from "big political people" before all the votes were counted (at 10pm on Election Day).
🚨🚨🚨Trump 3rd Circuit appointee: "Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here." justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…
"The campaign's claims have no merit."
"Though it alleges many conclusions, the Second Amended Complaint is light on facts."