Clement Atlee was imperfect. Every leader is. But 75 years later, despite the Tories' best efforts, we all still benefit from the changes introduced after WWII by a @UKLabour Government. And in this time of national crisis, we've needed our #NHS like never before.
In 1935, Herbert Morrison was defeated by Clement Attlee in the @UKLabour leadership election, but later acted as Home Secretary.
In 1945 he was given responsibility for drafting the Labour Party manifesto that included the blueprints for the nationalisation & the welfare state.
"Labour Party is a socialist party & proud of it. Its ultimate purpose at home is the establishment of the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain - free, democratic, efficient, progressive, public-spirited, its material resources organised in the service of the British people."
"We had not been afraid to be frank about our plans. There would be public ownership of fuel & power, transport, the Bank of England, civil aviation, & iron & steel. We proposed a housing programme dealt with in relation to good town planning."
"We promised to put the 1944 Education Act into practical operation. We said that wealth would no longer be the passport to the best health treatment. We promised a Labour Govt would extend social insurance over the widest field." In 1945, politicians didn't lie like they do now.
Thatcher: "The 1945 Labour manifesto was in fact a very left-wing document... a root & branch assault on business, capitalism & the market... Most radical of all, perhaps, was the Labour Party's attitude to land... compulsory purchase by local authorities was only the beginning."
In June 1945, Winston Churchill made a national radio broadcast, where he attacked the @UKLabour Party:
"I must tell you that a socialist policy is abhorrent to British ideas on freedom. There is to be one State, to which all are to be obedient in every act of their lives."
"This State, once in power, will prescribe for everyone: where they are to work, what they are to work at, where they may go & what they may say, what views they are to hold, where their wives are to queue up for the State ration, & what education their children are to receive."
His "crazy" broadcast continued: "A socialist state could not afford to suffer opposition - no socialist system can be established without a political police. They (the @UKLabour government) would have to fall back on some form of #Gestapo."
The Express dutifully reported it:
Attlee's response damaged Churchill:
"The Prime Minister made much play last night with the rights of the individual & the dangers of people being ordered about by officials. I entirely agree that people should have the greatest freedom compatible with the freedom of others."
"There was a time when employers were 'free' to work little children for sixteen hours a day. I remember when employers were 'free' to employ sweated women workers on finishing trousers at a penny halfpenny a pair."
"There was a time when people were free to neglect sanitation so thousands died of preventable diseases.
For years, every attempt to remedy these crying evils was blocked by the same plea of FREEDOM FOR THE INDIVIDUAL. It was in fact freedom for the rich & slavery for the poor."
"Make no mistake, it has only been through the power of the State, given to it by Parliament, that the general public has been protected against the greed of ruthless profit-makers & property owners. The Conservative Party remains as always a class Party."
Nothing changes.
"In twenty-three years in the House of Commons, I cannot recall more than half a dozen from the ranks of the wage earners. It represents today, as in the past, the forces of property and privilege."
In the 1945 General Election Attlee led the @UKLabour Party to a landside.
The @UKLabour Govt carried through a vast programme of reforms: the Bank of England, the coal mines, civil aviation, cable & wireless services, gas, electricity, railways, road transport & steel were nationalised, the #NHS was born, & independence was granted to India in 1947.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Voters need to know how right-wing populist nationalist politicians and radical/far-right nativist extremists construct their divisive discourse and rhetoric to exploit the anti-elite climate and fuel violence and division - and what to do about it.
So what can be done to counter divisive narratives and framing and to help Britain to become a more open, inclusive, fairer, less polarised and better multicultural society?
I make several suggestions in the above article, but make more below,
Countering the extreme right’s narrative of feeling "attacked" and needing to "defend" national identity requires a strategic, multi-faceted approach that challenges their framing while addressing underlying concerns and emotions.
The shameless lie that "Britain is lawless" is categorically false, as it contradicts empirical data on crime trends, rule of law metrics, and the functioning of UK institutions. Reform UK often use fearmongering exaggeration and selective framing to create a sense of crisis.
Official data from the ONS and Home Office indicate that overall crime rates in England and Wales have fluctuated but do not support the notion of a "lawless" state. The ONS reported a 7% decrease in total recorded crime (excluding fraud) from 2023 to 24.
#OnThisDay, 21 July, 1969, the Chicago Daily News published: The ‘love it or leave it’ nonsense, by Sydney J. Harris.
It began: One of the most ignorant and hateful statements that a person can make is “If you don’t like it here, why don’t you leave?”
I reproduce it, below.
Harris was born in London in 1917, moving to the US in 1922. A formidable journalist who established a distinct voice integrating incisive social commentary with wit and humour, his weekday column, ‘Strictly Personal’, was syndicated in 200 US newspapers.
The ‘love it or leave it’ nonsense, by Sydney J. Harris.
One of the most ignorant and hateful statements that a person can make is “If you don’t like it here, why don’t you leave?”
That attitude is the main reason America was founded, in all its hope and energy and goodness.
A few thoughts on Bob Vylan leading the #GlastonburyFestival crowd in chants of "Death to the IDF" (Israeli Defence Force), livestreamed by the @BBC, and the mischaracterisation of the chant by some MPs, news media, and activists.
In England, where #GlastonburyFestival is located, all of us have the right to freely express our criticism of anyone or anything - as long as there is no intent to provoke immediate unlawful violence or there is a reasonable likelihood it will occur as a consequence.
In England, free speech is protected under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998. However, inciting violence is a criminal offence under several laws which attempt to balance public safety with free expression rights.
In many countries, especially since Musk bought Twitter/@X, underregulated online extreme content has been used to groom and radicalise vulnerable people.
Too many cowardly politicians are scared to speak up for fear of being branded 'anti-free speech'.
Some MPs who have been in parliament for many years NEVER appear on any of the @BBC's "flagship" politics shows - but Reform's privately educated shit-stirring 'anti-elite' former Tory Sarah Pochin - an MP for FIVE WEEKS - gets her own special introduction on #PoliticsLive.
Politicians using dangerously irresponsible anti-Muslim rhetoric know their comments are normalising Islamophobia and endanger British Muslim women. Islamophobic incidents rose by 375% in the week after Boris Johnson called veiled Muslim women “letterboxes” in 2018.
#PolitcsLive
Britain prides itself in NOT being the sort of country that tells women how to dress. States that do dictate women’s clothing (eg Iran, Sudan, Saudi Arabia) are vilified as misogynistic & ultra-controlling: the antithesis of the enlightened, liberal west. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…