I hear you Jon. But we're not gonna pretend like this is a Trump thing. This is white America and has always been. You're just taking this opportunity because it's particularly bad right now and you wanna use it to punish Trump. I get it. But you can do better.
Please do use whatever rhetorical tactics you can to blast Trump. But be careful that you're not just describing how America has always worked and only pretending it's bad today. And more importantly, make sure you're gonna still be mad about it after Trump is gone.
These things Jon describes, where powerful people profit off the harm of others while giving themselves advantages, is at the very core of how America works. We have accepted that way of life for centuries. Trump does it with glee and forgets to pretend at decorum. That's all.
If America was *actually* mad at those in power for doing these things, they would not be in power. They would get voted out. They would get removed for gross malfeasance or some such. It would actually be hard to stay in power while causing egregious harm. That's not the case.
All I'm saying is I'm over listening to white people suggest that they're mad about this stuff. You're not. You're gonna vote for it again just as soon as it's mostly aimed at Black and brown people and not you. We are fully aware of that and you have yet to show us different.
Meanwhile, people of color are seeking to actually dismantle these systems so they can't harm *anybody*. You could consider assisting with that.

I should warn you that some of the "slogans" are likely to be a bit "off-putting". But I'm sure you can get past that right?
The reason I'm upset about this is that we KNOW it's not because white people are changing. In fact it's the opposite. They can only see their way clear in this moment because Trump is such a caricature of a villain. White people only understand white hats and black hats.
Most Americans don't base their values and their politics off of who is being harmed. Instead we look at who is *acting* like a villain. Who is slick and charming. Who tells us what they want to hear at any given time. Harm is a secondary consideration in American politics.
White Americans have more power to impact the country and the world than they can even understand. But they don't use it to help people. They are careless with power. They use it to get what they personally want at any given time. A lot of y'all think those are the same thing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marco Rogers

Marco Rogers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @polotek

13 Dec
Economics just isn't this simple. I wish that people who wanted to use this simple definition would admit that they're incentivized to do so because it benefits them in their current situation. It's okay. Just call it what it is.
Many employers are absolutely selling a lifestyle. Why does it make sense for an employer to upgrade their healthcare plan when the actual work hasn't changed? Because it's something their employees value and raises their standard of living. It makes the company more competitive.
Why does it make sense for a company to move to open a new office in a different location or even relocate the whole company. Part of the calculus is always that folks in that area will accept less money because they can still achieve a similar lifestyle there.
Read 26 tweets
13 Dec
"...even with artificial intelligence and third-party moderators, the company was 'deleting less than 5% of all of the hate speech posted to Facebook.'" buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/ryanma…
"The implicit vision guiding most of our integrity work today is one where all human discourse is overseen by perfect, fair, omniscient robots owned by Mark Zuckerberg."

That's a hell of a sentence.
I was debating this with @operaqueenie. She says facebook is a big problem, but not the only problem. And I found myself making a very passionate case that, yes, Facebook is the *whole* problem. Not the tool per se, but the power it wields and how it wields that power.
Read 8 tweets
13 Dec
They’re referring to this thread, which has been going around in coding circles. It’s highly entertaining. These kinds of technology “war stories” usually are. But we do have to ask if it was at all necessary.
I hesitate to share these kinds of stories these days. Because I realized that while they are interesting to hear, they are not fun to live through. It’s actually a story of a bunch of people being damn near run into the ground for the benefit of their employer.
Read 11 tweets
12 Dec
Having a place to post this is seriously the only reason I spun up a new blog. If I could have one single idea take hold in tech management it's to stop talking about project updates in 1:1s.
Let me be clear though. You need to talk about project updates. In fact, you probably need to talk about them more often. I see a lot of places where they are locked up in short 1:1 conversations. Change your process so you are hearing them all the time in other venues.
Get project updates out of 1:1s and you'll have room for much more important conversations with your individual direct reports. If your org is stuck in update mode, it will take some time to make this shift. But you will be glad you did.
Read 8 tweets
12 Dec
Apparently this person is “somebody” in AI research. They’re having a meltdown right now. Including calling Timnit Gebru a liar.
This man has never used to word "diatribe" to describe anything in his entire 5 years on twitter. I checked.

The first time he reaches for it is describing a Black woman who is frustrated and fed up with poor treatment. He calls it a "toxic environment".
Read 7 tweets
4 Dec
You can learn a lot by really examining what is happening with Timnit Gebru. Both how she was used to bolster Google's brand and credibility and how she was ultimately sacrificed when she wouldn't fall in line.
I'm really interested in hearing from Jeff Dean. The Google exec who Gebru says is responsible for backstabbing her. Because here's the thing. He could be a villain. Or he could just be an example of spineless white men who follow orders to destroy PoC when we don't behave.
I'm only talking about this explicitly because Gebru has decided to share her story openly. Keep in mind that what she's doing can and probably will be incredibly damaging to her. But we have to start standing our ground against this kind of villainy. This is how things go bad.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!