You can learn a lot by really examining what is happening with Timnit Gebru. Both how she was used to bolster Google's brand and credibility and how she was ultimately sacrificed when she wouldn't fall in line.
I'm really interested in hearing from Jeff Dean. The Google exec who Gebru says is responsible for backstabbing her. Because here's the thing. He could be a villain. Or he could just be an example of spineless white men who follow orders to destroy PoC when we don't behave.
I'm only talking about this explicitly because Gebru has decided to share her story openly. Keep in mind that what she's doing can and probably will be incredibly damaging to her. But we have to start standing our ground against this kind of villainy. This is how things go bad.
Gebru's story has me thinking about the mechanisms for how villainy moves. The ways it covers itself. Read the story. About how it went from her talking to humans to her getting faceless edicts from invisible actors. "It has been decided that you shouldn't publish".
This is incredibly intentional. It serves so many villainous goals. Gebru doesn't know who's making decisions, so she doesn't know she should fight with. She doesn't know how to win. And conveniently, if and when it does come out, we the public don't know who to blame.
Everybody involved passes the buck. It's "unfortunate", but it wasn't their decision. The person who made the decision is never revealed.
The goal is for us to start to second guess ourselves. To think it's too "complicated", and maybe we can't tell if it was true villainy.
There's one thing I learned that I want everyone to understand. There is no magic. There was a conversation between humans. Those humans made a decision. And other humans were given orders to drop the ax on Gebru. That is what happened.
Yes I know there is a line of thinking that says you should kowtow and defer to those in power. That stepping out of line justifies any retaliation.
Just so we're clear, that line of thinking is fucking trash. Especially when dealing with ethics.
Some people are brought up to always respect power and hierarchy. Those folks are gonna tell you that "you brought it on yourself". There are other ways to think about our relationship to power. We can't ignore the reality of power, but we do not have to be owned by it.
💯💯💯. When we talk about people getting pushed out, part of it is intentionally building a narrative that says it's *you* that's creating a problem. The dynamic is set up so that doing *anything* accept going along quietly is labeled as aggression.
This is an important illustration of the journey for white people. It's easy to assume that code switching is about speaking "properly". It's harder to internalize that it's really about a forced deference to your Whiteness.
Right. It hits different when you are the target. However that doesn't mean that you're being oppressed. It means you are being forced out of the limited view of reality that has been meticulously constructed for you.
That's what I mean when I say you don't have the range. Until you get dragged out of that limited bubble, you can't see the multitudes around you. You can't start to build better judgment about what is real harm and what is not. You're still working with the kindergarten rulebook
Kevin is trying his best. He seems sincere. But he's exhibiting the core fallacy that blocks a lot of white people from engaging honestly in this discourse. This is a gross mischaracterization of what is happening when we say "white people". It's intellectually lazy and dishonest
Let me be extra clear for @kevinrwhitley and everyone else.
"lumping the *entire* population categorically into a single entity"
This is wrong. It is not what is happening. This framing is *entirely* about YOUR feelings. Not about what is actually being said.
Until you can hear the phrase "white people" without turning it into an absolute generalization in your head, you will find that you do not have the range that is necessary to participate in the discourse. That's it. That's a place to start.
It's #GivingTuesday, which means we gotta talk about @bbfounders. This organization was started by my wife @operaqueenie. After founding her own startup and going through the trials of trying to raise money from people who don't fund Black and brown folks.
Being who she is, she set out to create alternatives for our community. She wanted to create different ways to support entrepreneurship for those who are underrepresented and underestimated. The mission of @BBFounders is to provide community, education, and access to founders.
The organization is run by @deldelp. Besides being a good friend of mine, she has an incredible mind for seeing the actual mechanisms that drive change. The work she does in policy, in activism, and in community have been inspiring to me and taught me so much.
"the core functionality of these apps is not significantly different than having a servant. What the technology has done is — most importantly — make it possible to not think of them as servants at all."
This is a very American thing. It's also critical to create enough indirection that the workers also don't think of themselves as servants. Or at least obscure things enough for them to manage the cognitive dissonance.
I'm gonna try to say this in a way that doesn't sound blamey, but I may fail at it. A lot of us have this experience talking to people who are learning. We say "you should learn fundamentals". And the responses we get are often ones of frustration and impatience.
I'm not dismissing those feelings. I think I understand a lot about where they come from. But I would like to see the conversation about combatting that and helping the community to be open to this kind of advice. There is no shortcut to becoming more confident in your skills.
I'm also wondering if there's another lesson here though. Maybe there's no shortcut that prevents people from having to learn this lesson for themselves. All of the cultural baggage around "learn to code" is giving people the wrong message about they're getting into.
A lot of white people need to be deprogrammed. It felt weird to use that word at first, but I honestly think it’s the right one. Like they’re mostly okay. Then you hit this completely fictional reality written into the firmware and it just causes these glitches.
We need a whole curriculum for this. Maybe it’s like rehab or something. But somebody sits down with @NathanLerner like let’s go through history in detail until you understand some fundamental things you believe just are not true. They never were. Then let’s rebuild your values.
It seems like this person is trying to do good work. They want to enable a more progressive future for everyone. That’s great. Imagine what they could accomplish if they weren’t working with a fundamentally flawed value system. One that won’t allow them to see the work clearly.