Alina Chan Profile picture
12 Dec, 30 tweets, 14 min read
Re-telling of covid's origin story in @guardian today misses key points about the whistleblowers, the seafood market, test kit and vaccine development in China, and publication of the first SARS-CoV-2 genome. I'll add them back into the story... theguardian.com/world/2020/dec…
Dec 30 2019
@guardian "Wuhan municipal health commission had issued an “urgent notice” online, warning all medical facilities to be on the alert"
@BBC Dr. Li Wenliang "sent a message to fellow doctors in a chat group warning them about the outbreak" bbc.com/news/world-asi…
@WSJ Dec 31/Jan 1 - Huanan seafood market completely sanitized and shutdown. China CDC collected hundreds of samples from animals at the market and the environment.
wsj.com/articles/china…
Different @BBC article: Jan 1, 2020, "Wuhan Public Security Bureau punishes eight people, including Dr Li Wenliang, for spreading "rumours" about the virus.
bbc.co.uk/news/extra/ews…
@BBC - Jan 2, WIV "maps the genome of the virus but the information is not shared publicly"

@AP - Jan 3, China CDC had the genome of the virus but "held back information about the genome and test designs" and only gave the designs to 3 Shanghai companies.
apnews.com/article/china-…
@BBC article Jan 3 - Dr Li Wenliang signs a confession to "illegal activity" "making false comments" that had "severely disturbed the social order"
bbc.com/news/world-asi…
Jan 4 - Leading Chinese vaccine developer Sinopharm kicked into high gear manufacturing a covid vaccine - still ~2 weeks before China confirmed human-to-human transmission
Jan 5 - Prof Zhang Yongzhen deposited the first SARS-CoV-2 genome on GenBank, but did not publicly release it.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN9089…
time.com/5882918/zhang-…
Jan 10/11 - Professor Edward Holmes called Prof Zhang and asked permission to share the genome publicly.

Jan 12 - The genome was also released publicly by GenBank. Prof Zhang's lab is probed and shut down for rectification.

time.com/5882918/zhang-…

virological.org/t/novel-2019-c…
@businessinsider Jan 14 - @WHO tweets saying "no clear evidence" COVID-19 could spread between humans.

businessinsider.com/who-no-transmi…

Jan 13-15 - first COVID-19 cases confirmed in Thailand and Japan.
@nytimes Jan 19 - Whistleblower @DrLiMengYAN1 reveals, anonymously, through youtuber Lude, that there is human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus that "the (Chinese) government was playing down."

nytimes.com/2020/11/20/bus…

gnews.org/431644/
@BBC Jan 20 - "China's National Health Commission confirms human-to-human transmission of the virus"

Also, the WIV submits their paper to @Nature describing the new virus as well as a 96% identical bat SARS virus they had collected years ago from Yunnan.

bbc.co.uk/news/extra/ews…
Jan 22 - China CDC director announced that they had “confirmed (SARS-CoV-2) was transmitted via wild animals illegally sold at a seafood market in Wuhan”

Same day, data for pangolin CoV with SARS2-like RBD publicly released @NCBI bioproject PRJNA573298

news.cgtn.com/news/2020-01-2…
Jan 22/23 - Wuhan lockdown announced. Read story by @BBC "came too late to prevent an estimated five million people leaving the city in the run-up to the national holiday (Chinese New Year)"
bbc.co.uk/news/extra/ews…
@WSJ Jan 31 - OIE Paris-based World Organization for Animal Health meeting, privately communicated that none of the animal samples from Huanan Seafood Market tested positive for the virus. "The group recommended a thorough investigation of the wildlife trade in China"
Jan 31 - USA enacts some form of travel ban on China. whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
I've only walked through some of the key events from Dec 30, 2019 through Jan 31, 2020.

@Guardian article also talks about the Proximal Origins paper and the pangolin CoVs... I recommend my timeline here:
Now, I'm going to dive a bit deeper into what the @guardian article wrote and explain a bit more of the context surrounding some of these facts.

First: "by the time Van Kerkhove saw her email, at least 124 people had fallen ill" theguardian.com/world/2020/dec…
This number of 124 covid cases in Wuhan by end of Dec "was reported by China July 31 but for some reason only posted on the WHO website Nov. 5."

Has that number changed by now? Considering that this is an update from July only made public in November?
sciencespeaksblog.org/2020/11/28/fiv…
2nd, "Yet it is not certain that the virus came out of the market."

Ya, the Chinese CDC director already said as much back in May.

globaltimes.cn/content/118950…
3rd, "Ideally, door-to-door detective work, talking to the first people to fall ill and their families and colleagues, would have begun in Wuhan in January. But the city was in lockdown"

But also China won't let @WHO in to investigate even till today.
“It was an absolute whitewash,” said Lawrence O. Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown University. “But the answer was, that was the best they could negotiate with Xi Jinping.”
nytimes.com/2020/11/02/wor…
4th, @guardian "at that stage China was doing what it needed to do – and what so many countries failed to do. It was stamping out the virus, not looking for the source."

There's not much to investigate origins-wise after 1-2 years + silencing of doctors. inews.co.uk/opinion/china-…
And this wording also seems to suggests that China was not looking for the source of the virus in the early days, which I think is inaccurate. They had collected hundreds of samples from the market by Jan 1, and were collecting detailed information about the index patients.
5th, "On 11 January, however, Chinese scientists handed the world an invaluable clue.. their genetic sequence of the novel virus was published"

Rather unexciting telling of the story of the 1st published SARS2 genome. Lab was shut down for rectification.
6th, "Despite the strong genomic trail, excitable China-blaming theories took off on rightwing news websites and social media in April, alleging the virus had been made in the Wuhan Institute of Virology"

What is this strong genomic trail?
Yes, we know the virus ultimately has origins in nature. Everything ultimately has its origins in "nature" (nothing is 100% manmade). But how did a virus with distant ancestors in Yunnan make its way to Wuhan city where there has been zero evidence of SARS-related CoV exposure.
7th, "a bunch of prominent researchers coming together to say this is why we don’t think it’s made in a lab: because you would never make a virus like this and there are too many links to other viruses"

Please see:
8th, "The idea that one person got infected in the lab and spread it to the entire world is the stuff of movies"

Some movies are based on real life events that are stranger than fiction. I look forward to the movie that is going to be made about covid's origins.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alina Chan

Alina Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ayjchan

14 Dec
Analysis by @edyong209 @TheAtlantic of the impact of the pandemic on how science is done.

I'm reading it from the POV of one of "Thousands of researchers dropped whatever intellectual puzzles had previously consumed their curiosity and began working on the pandemic instead."
People have asked me why I'm so obsessed with understanding the origins of SARS-CoV-2/covid.

My answer: How could I not be?

A virus pops out of nowhere and the entire world is put out of order. This is, hopefully, the pandemic of our lifetime.
Quote: Ebola and Zika each prompted a temporary burst of funding and publications. But “nothing in history was even close to the level of pivoting that’s happening right now,” Madhukar Pai of McGill University told (Ed Yong)... “It hit us at home” theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
Read 20 tweets
13 Dec
On more stories that keep evolving... remember when it was first officially revealed by the WIV that RaTG13, the closest related virus genome to SARS-CoV-2, was actually the same as bat CoV 4991 published in 2016? sciencemag.org/news/2020/07/t…
Turns out it wasn't "some random bat virus that is more distant" - in their Nov 17 @nature addendum, Shi clarified RaTG13 was 1 of 9 SARSrCoVs from a mine where people sickened with severe respiratory disease; "suspected.. infected by an unknown virus."
nature.com/articles/s4158… Image
So how does this match with what is in the @ScienceMagazine interview Q&A from July?
"I guess you are referring to the bat cave in Tongguan town in Mojiang county of Yunnan Province. To date, none of nearby residents is infected with coronaviruses."

sciencemag.org/sites/default/…
Read 5 tweets
11 Dec
Opinion @DavidQuammen "(spillover) generally happens when we intrude upon bats in their habitats, excavating their guano for fertilizer, capturing them, killing them or transporting them live to markets, or otherwise initiating a disruptive interaction."
nytimes.com/2020/12/11/opi…
It's important to pinpoint what these disruptive interactions are, which could include dozens of scientists sampling viruses in hard-to-reach habitats; see recent interview @DavidQuammen "We were not wearing what they called personal protective equipment.. npr.org/transcripts/80…
.. I asked Alexis, why the hell are we not? And he was just sort of fatalistic about it. He says there are constraints when you're wearing (PPE).. it's my judgment that the danger here is low enough that I'm not wearing a mask.. not recommending.. anybody else wear one either"
Read 4 tweets
9 Dec
I was recently asked what I would like to see come out of SARS-CoV-2/covid origins investigations.

I would like to know that, the next time a pandemic like this occurs, the world is better prepared, better informed as to how to determine its origins and prevent future outbreaks.
I'm going to break down 3 key publications that I think relate to covid origins. What were the questions they asked to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 came from nature vs from a lab?

Are these approaches sufficient to prepare us for the next mysterious pandemic?
The 1st is the widely-read Proximal Origins article - a correspondence published in @NatureMedicine on March 17, 2020. How did the authors determine that "SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus"?
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Read 23 tweets
8 Dec
Estimated 76% Manaus and 29% São Paulo population infected by covid by October.

"These results confirm that, when poorly controlled, COVID-19 can infect a high fraction of the population causing high mortality."

science.sciencemag.org/content/early/…
In Manaus, the >70% attack rate is "above the theoretical herd immunity threshold.. Monitoring.. new cases and.. ratio of local versus imported cases.. vital to understand (how) population immunity might prevent future transmission and the potential need for booster vaccinations"
US has 15M confirmed cases, "probably, at best, diagnosing 1 in 5 cases" - former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, Nov '20.

Rough calculation ~23% US population infected with covid by now + doubling time ~50 days according to @OurWorldInData + Xmas/NYE..

cnbc.com/2020/11/06/dr-…
Read 5 tweets
8 Dec
New perspectives piece in ⁦@NatureComms
Wonder what all these scientists could be talking about...
⁩“actors may be incentivized to be reckless if they believe they are unlikely to be held accountable for any accidents arising from their actions.” nature.com/articles/s4146…
"A key security challenge involves attribution: determining, in the wake of a human-caused biological event, who was responsible."

Any chance this is about COVID?

nature.com/articles/s4146…
"if an incident occurs.. near laboratories working on the causative agent, there is a greater chance of it being attributed to an accidental release."

Wonder which recent incident occurred near a lab working on the causative agent. nature.com/articles/s4146…
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!