Everything you learned in school about how to write, and most of what you learned in most jobs, is WORSE THAN WRONG.

Here's why your writing sucks, and how you can fix that:
You learned that the function of language is to state facts. [*Cough* rationalism...] FALSE!

Language is the way we do relationships. Writing puts you in relationship with readers.

Relationships are shared caring. Do you care about your readers? Do they care about your text?
DO I CARE? is what the reader asks when reading your title. When reading your first sentence. When reading your first paragraph. Unless the answer is HELL YES, they'll close the tab.

There's another hundred open. And there's the stuff in Pocket, and a subreddit to check, and
Each sentence you write has to show the reader two things: (1) reading it is more valuable TO THEM than alternatives, and (2) getting that value isn't more unpleasant than it is worth.
"You are doing this thing WRONG that is important TO YOU" tells the reader where the value is.

Then you have to deliver: here's how to do it better.
We, your readers, DON'T TRUST YOU. We expect you to waste our time, and to make your text ugly, tedious, and confusing.

Right? Because we know most writing sucks.

You need to convince us yours is an exception.
Your writing needs to show that YOU CARE ABOUT US, your readers.

You know who we are.

You know what we care about and why.

You care about that too, which is why you care about us.

You are going to take care of us through the reading process.
Larry McEnerney, the guy in that video, gets paid "stupid amounts of money" to fly to "interesting cities" to save fancy executives, lawyers, and management consultants about to be fired because THEIR WRITING SUCKS.

Those jobs are 100% about relationships... They didn't say it.
McEnerney says: be entertaining. Not quite right, I think...

Effective writing is playful.

Play demonstrates you recognize you are in relationship with us, your readers, so we can trust you.

Tease us. That shows you know who we are and what we care about.
Writing is a 100x as painful as reading.

At least, that's what you'd think reading most of it...

If your writing is playful, we can see you enjoyed it —because you imagined us enjoying it too!

Showing your enjoyment is showing yourself, which shows you are in relationship.
"Entertainment" is one way of providing value to readers, and showing you understand and care about them.

Storytelling is entertaining, and can sometimes make effective explanations. It's overused in pop science writing, but underused in many other genres.
Most writing is boring. It lacks surprise.

In writing a long series of facts, find and highlight unexpected aspects, even if they are unimportant to the main point. It shows you care.

In the worst case, you could add a footnote about aardvark cucumbers.
In relationship, in play, we gradually reveal our eccentricities.

Initially your readers care about your text because you are telling them what they are doing wrong and how to do better.

By the end, they should care because they care about you. Because they know who you are.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Chapman

David Chapman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Meaningness

11 Dec
Does “enlightenment” mean a permanent no-self state, someone asked in email? It depends who you ask… also, is that something worth pursuing? vividness.live/2012/09/13/epi…
Here @OortCloudAtlas answers to “what does ‘deconstructing yourself’ mean.”

A more sophisticated story than the Buddhist “no self” theory, which is ultimately about avoiding rebirth by not existing…

Starts 50:00.

Rest is worth listening to as well!
@OortCloudAtlas Oh yeah, relevant Meaningness chapter.

Come for the enlightenment, stay for the aardvarks. meaningness.com/self
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
Starting from Thales, 2600 years ago, rationalists have maintained religious certainty that all existence is bound by mathematical laws, despite for the first 2200 worth there being zero evidence for that, and overwhelming evidence against it.
The extraordinary triumph of the Copernican Revolution, culminating in Newton: rationalists FINALLY discovered *something*, one thing, that fit their religious preconception. Glory Be!

And if one thing, surely also every thing. And thus: modernity! NEWTONIZE ALL THE THINGS!
Discovering that Newton’s absolute truth was not, after all, true was a cosmic shock now underestimated. The collapse of modernity had many causes; for the intellectual elite this discrediting of the foundation of rationalism was central I think.
Read 5 tweets
26 Oct
🇺🇸 In the run-up to the last election, I wrote several pieces about politics from a meta-rational point of view. I’m going to tweet links to some of them as a thread over the next few days.
🇺🇸 Our current political divide is rooted in the culture war that began with the New Left & hippie counterculture in the 1960s-70s, versus the Evangelical counter-counterculture of the 70s-80s.

To better understand, I wrote a memetic history of that war: meaningness.com/countercultures
🇺🇸 The two countercultures, though apparently opposed, were strikingly similar attempts at solving the same fundamental problems of meaning—which are still unresolved.

My history of that attempt and its failure is long, so I will tweet only selections…
Read 27 tweets
26 Oct
Diane di Prima was one of the few poets I really like.

Thanks to @angelvsnovvs for RTing this to me, and to the several people who separately introduced me to her work decades ago.

@angelvsnovvs Diane di Prima’s _Seminary Poems_ were written during a 3-month Tibetan Buddhist study/meditation retreat at Rocky Mountain Shambhala Center.

They communicate the essence of Vajrayana. Many are also wryly funny (which is not separate from the essence of Vajrayana…)
@angelvsnovvs I did a similar one-month retreat program (dathün) at Rocky Mountain Shambhala Center a few years after her. It was one of the most significant events in my life. Diane di Prima’s descriptions of the place and time and life are highly evocative for me.
Read 8 tweets
24 Oct
🎙 @wolftivy and @miltonwrites of @palladiummag on society and politics after postmodernity—the question I care most about in the long run.

Thanks for the shout-out, and for Ash's clear & accurate summary of my vaguely-stated tweetstorm from last week!

palladiummag.com/2020/10/22/pal…
Fascinating in the podcast were thoughts on how to move forward, and what comes after—whereas discussions of postmodernity usually rehash "how did everything fall apart," which we now thoroughly understand.
@palladiummag asks a key prior question: "if we accept the postmodern critique, why did modernity work as well as it did for as long as it did?"

Standard postmodern talk just tries to discredit modernity, beating a dead horse. meaningness.com/systems-crisis…
Read 8 tweets
7 Oct
Three obstacles to explaining why representationalism is wrong:
1️⃣ It’s the culmination of the whole 2600+ year rationalist tradition on which our culture mainly rests. Everything points toward it. It’s inexorably deducible from a millennia-enduring zeitgeist. It can’t be considered because it’s implied by too much.
2️⃣ It’s the final reductio ad absurdum of rationalism. Representations inescapably must be physical things that interact with non-physical things. That cannot be accommodated in rationalist metaphysics. Representationalism can’t be doubted because everything else might fall apart
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!