From this it would seem that according to Imām Shāfiýī and Imām Nawawī, any and all buildings over graves must be demolished and it is impermissible to construct over them.
Rather, the Shāfiýī position is that it is Makrūh if done in land one owns, and it is Ĥarām if done in land that one does not own.
Imām Nawawī himself states this, before quoting Imām Shāfiýī. He writes:
❝As for building over it, then if it is in the ownership
of the one who builds, then it is Makrūh, and if it is in a waqfī graveyard then it is Ĥarām.❞
This is according to the agreement of all four Mad’habs; that it is impermissible to build over graves in the waqfī graveyards as this prevents others from their right of burial.
Let us now look to the actual quote of Imām Shāfiýī in his book al-Umm:
❝Indeed, I saw from among the governors who demolished [buildings over graves] in Makkah, so I did not see the Fuqahā’a criticising that. If the graves were in land that the deceased owned during their
lives, or their heirs after them, nothing was destroyed of what was built over them. Only that which was not owned by anyone was demolished, it was demolished so that the space of the grave would not be hindered for people, such that another cannot be buried there,
and so people would be inconvenienced.❞
This statement clearly shows the prohibition was seen only when it was done on land that did not have an owner, as this prevents others from being buried there.
As for when it is on land owned by the one who builds, then there is no prohibition in doing so, nor were such destroyed.
Usually, Najdīs only ever quote the first line of this statement, and it is no surprise as to why. They are adamant that it is completely prohibited no
matter what the situation, and that it is obligatory to demolish every single one.
The position was repeated by many Shāfiýī scholars throughout the ages, and many also made exceptions for building over the graves of the Anbiyā’a and Awliyā’a, including Imām Nawawī himself.
He writes in Rawđah al-Ţālibīn:
❝It is permissible for a Muslim and a Dhimmī to make a bequest to build at Masjid al-Aqşā and other Masājid, and to build over the graves of the Anbiyā’a, the Úlamā’a, and the Şāliĥīn, so as to increase in visitation and tabarruk by doing so.❞
Thus, Imām Nawawī himself saw it as permissible to build over the graves of the Anbiyā’a, the Úlamā’a, and the Şāliĥīn in order for people to visit and to do tabarruk therein.
Therefore, we may conclude that the Shāfiýīs do not consider it impermissible to build over all graves,
nor that it is obligatory to demolish all such buildings, as opposed to what the Najdīs state and literally impose, as is seen from their dark history, in fact one does not even have to look too far back, they even wish and joke about doing so with the Green Dome.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
around the mazārāt [graves] of the respected Úlamā’a and Mashāyikh قدست اسرارهم (may Allāh sanctify their secrets) on land with permissible disposal, with the purpose that visitors and beneficiaries may find rest [in them]. They made clear that the reason behind the prohibition
is [when there is] an evil intention or absence of benefit, thus where there is a praiseworthy intention and benefit is present, then the prohibition falls away. Analysis of circumstances and noble research in this matter is that if the building is built first and then burial
Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] received a query from Madrasah e Ahl e Sunnat, Bāzār Dīwān, Murādābād, sent by Maulavi Abu’l Masúūd Ábdu’l Wadūd Sahib, Ţālib e Ílm [student of knowledge], on 1st Jamād al-Ūlā
1336 AH:
Which sect is Wahābī, which are common, and where is their origin from, and what are their beliefs, and what has come in the Ĥadīth in their matter?
The answer:
Wahābī is a faithless sect, which burns at the honouring of those beloved to Allāh and wishes to erase
their remembrance and honouring by various sorts of stratagems. Its origin is from Iblīs Laýīn [accursed], that Allāh ázza wa jall gave the command to honour Sayyidunā Ādam عليہ الصلاة والسلام and that Malúūn did not accept. And in the time of Islām Dhu’l Khuwayşarah Tamīmī
IS IT VALID TO BELIEVE ALLĀH IS LOCATED ON THE ÁRSH?
Alahazrat Imām Aĥmad Riđā Khān al-Ĥanafī al-Baraylawī [1272-1340 AH / 1856-1921 CE] was sent by Ţālib Álī Sahib on 15th Jamād al-Ūlā 1336 AH:
To consider the Dhāt of Bārī [the Creator] táālā to be only on the Ársh and not to
consider any creation of Allāh, other than above the Ársh, to be encompassing the Dhāt of Bārī táālā, but rather to say that only the Divine knowledge encompasses all things and his Dhāt is solely on the Ársh, and not in another place. Is this belief that of Ahl e Sunnat or
not? And the one who believes this, is it permissible or not to pray behind him? And also explain this, that people attribute this belief to the Ĥanābilah, is this truly the belief of the Ĥanābilah or not? To consider the Dhāt of Allāh to be on the Ársh, without expressing the
Since they cannot refute the writings of the Imām, they feel the need to cast false accusations against him. Anybody who has read the writings of the Imām would know he hated Kāfirs, especially the British, and did not support them.
Mawlānā Arshad al-Qādirī [1343-1422/1925-2002] was a famous debator, prolific author, prominent activist and educationist. He wrote in the foreword to Sawāniĥ Imām Aĥmad Riđā by Shaykh Badruddīn Aĥmad:
“Often, I have challenged those who try to clean the dirt upon their faces by
trying to wipe it with the mantle of Alahazrat, to show us proof for their claims; regardless of such proofs in the books of his admirers or in those of his adversaries. Show us a single instance where Alahazrat was invited by any officer of the British government; or that any
This is what was given when we asked for references. These are not even books by the Imām, but works that are against Sufism. Let us take a look at these sources:
1. al-Kashf ‘an Haqeeqat as-Sufiyyah (1/350). There is no mention of Alahazrat
This is a common claim made by the enemies of Allāh and His Rasūl ﷺ. However, let us investigate the reality of this claim by perusing the books of lexicon and Tafsīr.
The word کواعب, Kawāíb, is the plural of کاعب, Kāíb.
Let us first take a look at how this word is defined by the lexicographers.
Abu’l Ĥusayn Aĥmad ibn Fāris ibn Zakariyyah al-Qazwīnī al-Rāzī [329-395 AH / 941-1004 CE] writes in Maqāyīs al-Lughah:
“Káb is a sound root that
indicates protrusion and rising in something. From the same root comes the word Kaáb: the ankle of a man, which is the bone on the two sides of the lower leg where it meets the foot. And the word Kaábah: House of Allāh táālā, it is said it is named this because of its prominence