New working paper! Consider the decision problem, "For this choice rule, does there exist a strategy-proof mechanism?" This is an easy problem; by the revelation principle, we just need to check that the direct mechanism is IC, which takes linear time. (thread) #EconTwitter Image
Now consider the problem, "For this choice rule, does there exist an obviously strategy-proof (OSP) mechanism?" OSP depends on the extensive form, so the class of candidate mechanisms is combinatorially complex.
A prior result establishes that, if such a mechanism exists, it can be verified in polynomial time. (So the decision problem is in the complexity class NP.) But can we decide the problem quickly? A brute force search through all the mechanisms would take exponential time.
We provide a polynomial-time algorithm that, given a choice rule, determines whether there exists an OSP mechanism. It also constructs that mechanism, if it exists! This implies that the decision problem is in P.
This is joint work with Louis Golowich, a Harvard undergraduate math/CS major, who deserves the lion's share of the credit.

\thread

drive.google.com/file/d/1toESMZ…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shengwu Li

Shengwu Li Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShengwuLi

13 May 20
I just came across this! unfortunately, the mechanism proposed is not incentive compatible. Proof to follow. 1/N
@ATabarrok proposes that "the NYTimes should bet a portion of Silver’s salary, at the odds implied by Silver’s model, randomly choosing which side of the bet to take, only revealing to Silver the bet and its outcome after the election is over". 2/N
He writes, "A blind trust bet creates incentives for Silver to be disinterested in the outcome but very interested in the accuracy of the forecast." Is this true? 3/N
Read 8 tweets
5 Feb 20
Experimental #EconTwitter, here's an open question about mechanism design that lab experiments could answer. There's been an explosion in formal standards for what counts as a 'simple' mechanism. Do these in fact predict subject behavior? (1/N)
See e.g.
Li (AER 2017) google.com/url?q=https%3A…

Pycia and Troyan (2019) people.virginia.edu/~pgt8y/Pycia-T…

Borgers and Li (Econometrica 2019) econometricsociety.org/publications/e…

(2/N)
My JMP gave some evidence that one of these concepts (OSP) has some empirical support in auctions. It predicts, for instance, that subjects will make mistakes in second-price auctions but not in ascending auctions. But what about other settings? (3/N)
Read 6 tweets
12 Dec 19
One reason why grad students find it tough to do economic theory: It takes courage to make wrong guesses. For (most) problem sets, you know ahead of time that your target theorem is true and provable. For real research, you have to guess. (1/N)
Most theorems worth proving are ex ante implausible. If your guesses often turn out right, you should aim higher. You need the emotional fortitude to make conjectures and work under uncertainty, knowing that most conjectures are wrong. (2/N)
Crucially, you often only discover whether a model is fruitful by working on the model - which means making guesses and trying to prove them or find counterexamples. Even wrong conjectures can be productive! (3/N)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!