In-person dating is no longer banned in San Francisco.
But you can only date outdoors and no double dates.
And wear a mask. No kissing.
You can kiss but only if you move in together.
This is true in most of the rest of the Bay Area and LA too. Except San Mateo and Napa.
These rules are set by the state under the regional health order, adopted by SF. I think people should be able to date, safely. I'm glad our health department took some small steps to clarify that. These tweets were both factual & sarcastic, which i guess is the world we are in
This isn't just in SF. SF actually set a more permissive order than the state order allows, based on recent changes. The restrictions on people from different households having physical contact is not an SF specific thing at all.
I didn't make these rules, I'm just reporting them as I understand them 🤷🏻♂️.
I think we need to give people more ways to interact with each other safely. Dating will happen. People will spend time together. Acting as though it won't is unrealistic, contradictory, and will backfire. So yes I agree these rules are a bit ridiculous.
Damn y'all, maybe some of you didn't catch the tone. I support people dating and finding ways to do that safely. I do think these rules are contradictory, unreasonable and unrealistic in a lot of ways. I guess the tone didn't come thru entirely 😩🤣
😩🤣😩🤣😩🤣😩🤣
😩😩🤣😩🤣😩😩
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today I am having another hearing--demanding urgency, a bigger coordinated comprehensive plan from city departments, accountability, for the most deadly epidemic impacting SF residents right now--the drug overdose epidemic
It's at PSNS committee, we expect it to be heard at 11am
Over 550 people have died of drug overdose thru Oct of this year. That's nearly 2 a day. Most of them had fentanyl in their system. That's nearly triple the number of 2 years ago. Tragic, preventable, horrific.
The brutality of it is so clear for everyone to see. There are people who are working tirelessly to save lives. But what we are doing is not enough right now, it is inadequate on all fronts. And it is only going to keep getting worse unless we have bigger and better responses.
Our legislation to keep SIP hotels open passed out of Committee tonight.
With COVID-19 cases spiking, cold coming, shelters mostly closed, lack of housing placements available, FEMA reimbursing most of cost--its common sense to keep hotels open for health, safety, humanity.
Thanks to the many people who called in, organized, including the SIP residents, operators, providers, workers.
The legislation passed 2-1. It'll take more work to get a veto-proof majority to pass it at the Board next week.
I stopped by our Tenderloin outdoor dining on Larkin to thank everyone for their hard work over last few months--there was a lot of resistance, doubt, skepticism initially. But people came together & made it happen.
It may have been just a couple of blocks, but we also were able to demonstrate that the TL wants & deserves transformational street changes, that better utilize city streets for positive safe community and economic activity. I'm hopeful about what we can accomplish in the future
I'm disappointed that people were put in the position of relying on outdoor activities for months, encouraging them to make investments, to tell customers, friends, family that it was perfectly safe, only to turn around & prohibit it. Like everyone, I hope that this is over soon
This remodeled park in the TL opened for just a few weeks, provided safe, healthy, stewarded play & respite. It is soul crushing that it will be required to close.
Meanwhile on blocks surrounding it, literally 100s of people are still congregating on sidewalks, mostly w/o masks.
Up the street on Larkin, we've had outdoor dining which this community fought for and everyone was told was safe. It has security, it's brought community, and safe dining. We struggled to convince people to come out. Now it'll have to close too maybe for good. It is very painful
I hope that everyone understands the need to take some greater protective measures, but the inequities in who carries the burdens, the inconsistencies, lack of economic support, especially with this order is hard.
The CA state regional public health orders allow retail and malls to stay open at reduced capacity, but requires all outdoor playgrounds to close.
I am yet to hear a public health explanation for that, good or otherwise, & am very concerned about impact on families & kids.
I represent a dense district where many families live in small apartments, often far from larger city parks. Where can they go outside safely for the next month? Malls? Here in SF we've invested a lot into staffing at playgrounds, signage, making sure they can be used safely.
If there's a good explanation for this other than "that's what the state said," I believe families deserve it, along with real solutions. Families and kids have been hit especially hard--it has taken a huge toll on their emotional, physical, academic and mental well being.