Let’s gather a few points.
1) Legally, this is nonsense. A person has to state (in present tense) that they resign for it to be a resignation.
1) Legally, this is nonsense. A person has to state (in present tense) that they resign for it to be a resignation.
https://twitter.com/pmddomingos/status/1337540166299226112
2) Pragmatically, this is bullshit. That people say they will do something under certain conditions in the future doesn‘t mean—when the future has passed—they did it in this way.
3) However you approach it, you need the person’s account & she needs to have said she’s resigning.
3) However you approach it, you need the person’s account & she needs to have said she’s resigning.
4) It’s clear Pedro wants to logic-muscle his way to an unsubstantiated, alternative way of seeing the world. That unsubstantiated, alternative way involves running roughshod over the first-person, substantiated account of the person in question, who happens to be a Black woman.
There are many people who have pointed out, patiently, how wrong Pedro is. Has he responded yet? Nah.
https://twitter.com/DiverseInAI/status/1337738788521598976?s=20
Nice man. So civil in his use of language. 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
