Perhaps @BitChute is playing 4D chess, but reading through HNH's literature, there is clearly no room today for a "neutral" platform to extend "olive branches" to entities who want us dead and gone. 1/5
My understanding is that HNH already works with and advises the U.K. government. So eventually, they'll just get @PatAlternative and others declared "terrorists" and BitChute will then comply with the termination of that "extremist content." 2/5
Perhaps @bitchute does have their hands tied, and perhaps this was an honest attempt to play the game. But I don't see anything meaningful resulting from such a move. 3/5
It's not as if the public will read that statement, think that HNH is unreasonable, and then @bitchute will further secure its position as a "neutral" platform. 4/5
As I see it, in order to survive in this system, all bodies must eventually acquiesce to the will of groups like HNH, and what I see going on now appears to be the beginning stages of that process for @bitchute. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh