I know this is subjective, but there is little doubt in my mind that the first tied Test match, at Brisbane, was the greatest in history.

Today is the 60th anniversary of the final day of that Test.

Here is how the drama unfolded as the day went on.

But first, some context.
+
Not only the greatest, this was one of the most significant Test matches.

West Indies had their first full-time black captain, in Worrell.

The history of racism in the islands, the ridiculous injustice of it all, demands a separate thread.

I shall leave that for another day.
+
There is more.

Until this point, only Test matches involving England used to receive serious coverage.

That would change here. That demands another thread too.

Now for the cricket.

After four days, the score read West Indies 453 and 259/9, Australia 505.

207 ahead.
+
The match highlights included Sobers' 132; a composed 181 from O'Neill; Hall's 50, then 4/140; and Davidson's 44 and 10 wickets.

Sobers' performance deserves a mention.

A local newspaper had commented on the morning of the first day that Benaud had the measure of Sobers.
+
Sobers must have read it.

So exhilarating were Sobers' strokes that Benaud thought the spectators should pay surcharge on their tickets as privilege for watching it.

Let us turn to that dramatic final day.

Two things happened that morning that seemed innocuous at that point.
+
First, Benaud spotted white clover flowers on the outfield.

The curator told him that there had been a shower just after 7.30 that day. There was no time to mow the grass.

The other incident involved Ron Lovitt, The Age's photographer for the day.
+
Before the day's play, Lovitt clicked a photograph of the governor of Queensland for a feature.

We shall return these later.

On field, West Indies added another 25 that morning.

Davidson finished with 11 wickets to go with that first-innings 44.

But his role was not over.
+
Australia needed 233 in 310 minutes.

Hall bounced Simpson early on.

Simpson tried to duck, was caught in two minds, and fended to short leg. 1/1.

Then Hall had Harvey brilliantly caught by Sobers at slip. Sobers injured his finger in the process but stayed on. 7/2.
+
McDonald and O'Neill took the score to 28/2 at lunch.

During the break, Benaud had a word with them.

All three agreed that they needed to up the tempo.

The idea of a draw never came up.

O'Neill went after Hall immediately after lunch, taking three fours and a three.
+
The he tried to cut Hall and was caught behind. 49/3.

Worrell bowled McDonald next over. 49/4.

Hall bowled short again. The ball took Favell's glove and went to short leg. 57/5.

And Mackay was bowled when he tried to play Ramadhin across the line. 92/6.

Another 141.
+
West Indies' match to lose.

Davidson and Benaud hung on, taking Australia to 109/6 at tea.

They needed 124 in the final session.

Bradman came over to the dressing-room at tea to have a word with Benaud.
+
- What are you going for, Richie? A win or a draw?
- We're going for a win, of course.
- I'm very pleased to hear it.

Bradman would have done the same.

Headingley 1948, for example.

The greatest teams have always played to win. That is a basic criterion for greatness.
+
The first two overs fetched six singles. Then they took a four each off Valentine's over.

The fifty-run stand came at a run a minute.

Worrell saved Hall for the second new ball – but the others made little impact.

Australia reached 172/6 at drinks. Another 61.
+
The match had swung back – but not completely.

And they were 206/6 when Worrell tossed the new ball to Hall.

And yet nothing happened. Davidson and Benaud carried on.

Australia needed 9 in 10 minutes.

There would be, in all likelihood, two eight-ball overs.
+
Benaud ran a single off the second ball. Davidson returned the strike.

Seven more.

And then Benaud pushed one between mid wicket and square leg.

"Yes", he yelled, and set off: surely Solomon could not pick up and throw from that angle before Davidson would made it?
+
But Solomon did, and the West Indians finally celebrated.

Davidson had added 80 to his already impressive match numbers.

He had become the first cricketer to score a hundred runs and take ten wickets in a Test match.

Grout's gloves slipped from his hands as he walked out.
+
He was visibly nervous.

He played out two balls before getting off the mark.

But Benaud could not retain the strike.

There was time for one eight-ball over.

Australia needed another six.

While all this was going on, Kline, scheduled to bat last, had asked McDonald:
+
"I won't have to go in, will I?"

It was unlikely, McDonald had said.

If only he knew.

The shadows were lengthening. Hall marked his long run-up.

But another drama had been unfolding in The Gabba.

Remember Lovitt? At this point he realised he had only one plate left.
+
If only he had not clicked the governor!

Lovitt somehow had to figure out which of the eight balls would be the last.

They needed six, and it was unlikely that they would go for it right away.

He waited.

The first ball hit Grout on the solar plexus, then fell at his feet.
+
Amidst all this, Benaud sprinted as if his life depended on it.

He had not called, but Grout saw him running, and responded despite his agony.

5 from 7. What was more, Benaud had strike.

But something else happened as well, according to umpire Col Hoy.
+
For some reason, the people who maintained the scoreboard at The Gabba missed that run.

So everyone at the ground were under the impression that they needed 6 from 7.

Worrell had instructed Hall against a bouncer.

But Hall had been fuming after that leg-bye.
+
He bounced, and this was came quicker than Benaud expected.

Benaud tried to hook. The edge went to the big gloves of Alexander.

5 from 6. Two wickets. Meckiff was next man in.

The next ball, a defensive push, was the only eventless ball of the over. 5 from 5.
+
Now Meckiff played and missed, and Grout set off for a bye.

Alexander threw and missed.

Hall collected it mid-pitch and threw it at the non-striker's end.

He missed as well.

The throw was wayward, but Valentine prevented any overthrow. 4 from 4.

And Grout was on strike.
+
Hall could not be a happy man, Grout figured out. Another bouncer? He played the hook well...

But it was not a bouncer!

Grout mistimed completely. The ball went up almost vertically.

Kanhai waited for the catch at square leg.

Another wicket... surely?
+
For some reason Hall had decided to go for it. They yelled to stop him, but to no avail.

It was a long distance, but despite an entire day's bowling, Hall ran really, really fast. "How Wes ever got there I will never know," exclaimed Worrell.

No physical damage was done.
+
But the catch was grassed.

And a dejected Hall realised that they had also run a single. 3 from 3.

Now Meckiff gave an almighty heave, and the ball ran towards square leg.

The batsmen ran one, two... but did they need to? It was racing towards the boundary anyway.
+
Remember the uncut clovers and the unmown grass?

They slowed the pace of the ball.

Alexander had positioned himself well, but even then Hunte's throw had to be quick and accurate.

He swooped down on the ball, picked it up, and threw it flat – and straight into the gloves.
+
All in one go, in a ridiculously short span of time.

Grout's dive fell a foot short.

The scores were level, but Australia had a wicket in hand.

Kline's worst fears had come true. He was now needed in the middle.
+
He had been frantically looking for his gloves before walking out.

He had not realised that he had been sitting on them.

Now Worrell walked up to his spearhead: "Remember, Wes, if you bowl a no-ball, you will never be able to go back to Barbados".
+
Meanwhile, Lovitt had decided that this was it.

But what to click? What if the action happened away from where he would focus?

He turned to Harry Martin of The Herald.

Martin had also run out of films – almost.

Both men were down to their last films.
+
They were from rival newspapers, but that did not matter anymore. They had to collaborate.

They decided to toss a coin. Martin calls tails.

He would follow the ball. Lovitt would focus on the pitch.

The picture you see was clicked by Lovitt.
+
Hall steamed in. He did not overstep. Worrell's words had an impact, he later admitted.

The left-handed Kline played the ball to square-leg and set off.

By then Meckiff was already sprinting down the pitch.
+
Lashley ran in from mid-wicket before realising that it was Solomon's throw to make.

Worrell had meanwhile run to the non-striker's end to cover the throw; Sobers and Kanhai, to the striker's end.
+
But none of that was needed, for Solomon – despite having only one stump to wait at, despite the tremendous pressure – managed to hit directly.

They appealed to umpire Hoy, stationed not at square leg but point.

Out.
+
The West Indians were jubilant, for they thought they had won (the scorecard had missed a run, remember?).

Even the radio announced a West Indian win.

Only some time later did the truth surface.

Meanwhile, Lovitt clicked the most iconic photograph in the history of cricket.
+
And the greatest Test series in history was set into motion.

*

A couple of things.

First, I talked about this photograph (along with a few others) in a podcast hosted by @RandomCricketP1.

Here is the URL.


Warning: I speak worse than I write.
+
Secondly, I have now kept my promise.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Abhishek Mukherjee

Abhishek Mukherjee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ovshake42

13 Dec
On this day, 1948, during the Sydney Test, Vinoo Mankad whipped off the bails at the non-striker's end.

Bill Brown, out of the crease, was ruled out.

The mode of dismissal is unofficially referred to as Mankading.

There are a few misconceptions regarding Mankading.
+
Misconception 1: Mankad was the first to do this

Mankad was the first to do this *in a Test match*. However, there was nothing new about it.

The first recorded instance of Mankading in First-Class cricket happened in 1835 (not 1935).

Thomas Barker ran out George Baigent.
+
By 1843, Barker had run out four others, the last of these at Lord's.

No "spirit of cricket" garbage was uttered during any of this.

This illustration is from Nicholas Felix's 1845 book Felix on the Bat.

Do not miss the caption. This was the general attitude towards this.
+
Read 17 tweets
12 Dec
Ghulam Guard, the first left-arm seamer to open bowling for India, was born on this day, 1925.

At 6'3", Guard was the tallest Indian cricketer between Ladha Ramji (1933-34) and Abey Kuruvilla (1997).

He also worked in the police force as a sub-inspector.
+ Image
Guard took 5/66 and 4/69 in the final of the 1959-60 Ranji Trophy.

And then he found a mention in a police journal. Not many Indian cricketers have achieved this.

The report in Indian Police Journal, Volume 5 ran:
+
"Ghulam Guard, Sub-Inspector in the Bombay State Police Force, hit newspaper headlines with his fine spell of bowling in the Ranji Trophy Cricket Final between Bombay and Mysore."

Guard bowled at a lively pace and could move the ball, and his height helped him generate bounce.
+
Read 5 tweets
12 Dec
On this day, 2000, South Africa and New Zealand played out a drab draw in a rain-affected Test match at Johannesburg.

This man, Chris Scott, did not play but was named was named Player of the Match.

Here is what happened.
+ Image
It had rained heavily on Day 1.

The outfield was waterlogged, but the ground staff did a fantastic job and ensured cricket got underway on Day 2.

Almost a hundred overs of cricket were played on the day.

South Africa bowled out New Zealand for 200, then finished on 18/1.
+
But this was followed by two more days of rain, which as good as killed the match.

Once again the ground staff did a stellar job, and made some cricket possible on Day 5.

Dippenaar scored a hundred, and South Africa finished the Test on 261/3.
+
Read 4 tweets
11 Dec
On this day, 2007, Luke Pomersbach had come to the WACA with his girlfriend to watch a T20I between Australia and New Zealand.

After scoring 395 runs at 98.75 that season, Pomersbach had a drink too many with Shaun Marsh.

Both men were suspended till December 14.
+
But there was no ban on watching cricket, so he went to the ground.

Just before the match, Brad Hodge reported a back injury and was ruled out.

Now Stuart Clark was the only man in the reserve.

Replacing Hodge with Clark would mean playing with one batsman less.
+
The team management must have noticed Pomersbach's form.

They also knew he was around.

Pomersbach was parking the car when a friend told him.

He initially thought it was a joke (what would you have done?).

Once convinced, he rushed to report to the dressing-room.
+
Read 5 tweets
11 Dec
Subhash Gupte, born on this day, 1929, was arguably the greatest spinner India has ever produced.

I have obviously never seen him bowl, but every eyewitness has rated him as extraordinary.

And yet, BCCI treated him too shabbily – but more of that later.
+
Even if one looks at basic data, Gupte's greatness becomes obvious.

Gupte took 12 five-wicket hauls in 36 Tests (one in three) and 61 innings (one in five).

Remember, he did this despite having to share wickets with Mankad and Ghulam.
+
Gupte's 65 overseas wickets came at 28.52.

Put a 50-wicket cut-off, and no Indian spinner has a better average.

In fact, nobody else averages less than 31.

One must remember that unlike some other world-class leg-spinners, Gupte seldom not have an all-time great batsman.
+
Read 18 tweets
10 Dec
Chris Martin was born on this day, 1974.

When he retired, his 233 Test wickets were the third-most among New Zealand bowlers, after Hadlee and Vettori.

However, it is his batting that made him a cult hero.

Before going into that, a bit on his bowling.
+
Martin's wickets came at almost 34, not great numbers for a spearhead from New Zealand.

But in the 2000s (the decade), he sent down 1745.5 overs – over twice as any New Zealand fast bowler.

So there was no steady fast bowler at the other end.
+
All of them were hit by injuries at some point, which should give that bowling average some leeway.

Now for his batting.

Martin averaged 2.36 with bat.

Put a 50-run cut-off, and nobody averaged less than 3.46 – 47% more than Martin.

Martin scored 123 runs from 104 innings.
+
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!