“Liberal” “Liberal Hoax.” The conservative buzzword to denounce the left. We don’t mind, we reply with liberal quotes such as JFK. However, why is it a ridiculous thing for conservatives to say? Particularly conservative Christians??? Because the word is Biblical.
The King James Version of 1611 of the Bible contains the word liberal. In the American King James Bible also contained the word liberal. But why was this word so important to Christianity and particularly America? Particularly the King James Bible?
First, the King James Bible was the break from the Catholic Church. For the Puritans, Presbyterians and Methodists who came to America, this was important and important because of the vision for America. There have been comments that “Jesus was a liberal.” But these are not just
comments. It’s Biblical. To understand this connection, you have to read and understand the Old Testament and the prophecy of Isaiah. Isaiah prophesied the coming of the Messiah. And his prophecy was what his followers saw in Jesus. This messiah would be a liberal. Isaiah 32
is the reign of righteousness. The blessings from the coming king. But this first prophecy was of Hezekiah, the time of the Assyrian invasion of Judah. What qualities would a king have? Liberal qualities. Really, the qualities were liberal??
“But the liberal devises liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand” Isaiah 32-8. What does this mean? The translation is “Deviseth liberal things - He purposes those things which will tend to promote the public welfare, and not those merely which will conduce to
his private ends and gratification.” The word 'liberal' means generous, noble, large-hearted, benevolent; a man of large views and of public spirit; a man above covetousness, avarice, and self-seeking; a man who is willing to devote himself to the welfare of his country, and to
the interests of his fellow-men. It is implied here that such persons would be selected to administer the affairs of the government I under the wise and virtuous prince of whom the prophet speaks.
So how is it that conservative don’t understand it. We know that liberal means
noble. If a Christian still reads the KJV or the AKJV, they will be aware of this. From 1700 to 1900, these were what was used. But from 1901, the American Standard Version or American Revision was used. Particularly in schools. This version removed the word liberal and replaced
it will noble. “But the noble deviseth noble things; and in noble things shall he continue.”
Isaiah32-8 (ASV). And a liberal was also generous. Proverbs 11-25 (KJV) states “The liberal soul shall be made fat: and he that watereth shall be watered also himself. Again liberal has
been removed and is now
“A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mr. Spock 🖖 (Commentary)

Mr. Spock 🖖 (Commentary) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SpockResists

14 Dec
My thread yesterday about Hitler, his knowing that he would have to be a Christian hypocrite for political advantage, would also need influential Christian leaders to succeed. For Hitler, this was Gerhard Kittel, the German theologian. He proposed extermination of the Jews.
I briefly mentioned Jerry Falwell. Far right conservative activists Ed McAteer and Paul Weyrich we’re regarded as radicals. There group was to change the existing power structure, but they wanted to change what conservative meant. Weyrich was the man with the vision. He was
known as the “evil genius” of the 1980 manifesto “The New Right: We’re Ready to Lead.” They would establish themselves first as the opposition, then the alternative, finally the government. They would weaken existing institutions and eventually destroy them. First they would
Read 33 tweets
13 Dec
On April 12, 1922, Hitler gave a speech to a crowd in Munich proclaiming he was a Christian, “My Christian feeling directs me to my Lord and saviour as a fighter. As a Christian I have the duty for the truth and what is right.” His supporters believed him
They stated, “Hitler said it, I believe it, that settles it.”
Joseph Goebbels knew Hitler to be anti-Christian, in his diary entries, Hitler in reality wanted to destroy the churches. He saw Christianity as a symptom of decay, a strata deposited by the Jewish race.
Read 41 tweets
13 Dec
When Nazis Took Manhattan : Code Switch : NPR npr.org/sections/codes…
Riots erupted between anti-Fascists and Blackshirts (British Fascists)

time.com/4516276/cable-…
The spread of fascism in the 1920s was significantly aided by the fact that liberals and mainstream conservatives failed to take it seriously. Instead, they accommodated and normalised it.
torch.ox.ac.uk/article/no-thi…
Read 9 tweets
29 Nov
From the very beginning in America, Christian nationalism was branded extremism. Particularly Massachusetts Puritanism. All churches were branded dens of sin and ungodly if they didn’t belong to Massachusetts Puritanism. The story can be traced back to Boston, England.
A loose-living minister was tired of being hauled before the towns strict Puritan magistrates. This minister believed he could behave how he wanted, and didn’t want to conform to the Churches rules. He believed individual churches should be autonomous and preach whatever they
like. He was asked to questioned by the law of the Church of England. He went into hiding and didn’t attend the hearing. 76 ministers who believed they should teach whatever they wanted left England for New England before 1640. In these churches in New England, the sermons
Read 19 tweets
28 Nov
Part 2 of “The religious right in America is nationalist identity, it is not a faith expressed through practice.”

I wanted to extend on the thread I did yesterday to understand how religious nationalists are able to vote for a man like Donald Trump.
So first we must understand how a man who is the antithesis of Christianity, a religion that when PRACTISED means purity, humility and mercy, was able to not only get the vote of American Christians. We have to remember that Christian nationalism is based upon being born in
America. To be an American is to be a Christian. That’s it. It has nothing to do with the teachings of Christianity. Trumpism is among other things, a reactionary version of white Christian nationalism.
Read 16 tweets
27 Nov
The religious right in America is nationalist identity, it is not a faith expressed through practice.
What I mean by this is a reflexive religion-nationalism. It has nothing to do with faith and doctrine. It is a Turk is a Muslim, a Russian is Orthodox and a Tibetan is Buddhist. You identify with this religion based upon where you are born. That’s why in America you get the
religious right that will make a comment like “I’m a Christian and a proud American.” In the same sentence. Then you look at their behavior that is not based on Christian doctrine. For the religious right it is nationalist identity only. It is also ex patria. Ex patria that puts
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!