1/ The state of the Zim Economy. Looking ahead.

In August 2017, supermarkets were breaming with product,albeit an ominous cloud hung over the state. The black market for forex reached 40% premium from 1:1 gedye.

Inflation was only 4.83%. But even the Herald had no good news
2/ Fast forward to Dec 2020, two years of negative growth makes Zim an economic depression. Technically Zim is in an ECONOMIC DEPRESSION. Coupled with high inflation, it’s the worst kind. STAGFLATION.

Yet, pundits & GOZ maintain a happy festive is to be had.
3/ I have noticed the new regime does not take kindly to debate. Let alone robust debate. This is seen by how much gusto in spin is spent by GOZ in ridiculous propositions such as Budget surplus & now $1bn in FX reserves.

There is a dangerous flirtation with the futile
4/
It is futile to tax an economy in a depression. Even the most arden communist understands this. The common man to cabinet know this. So why is MOF strident in this furlong end? Can we ask the Professor what he taught must happen in an economic depression?
5/

The introduction of the 2% transaction tax inhibits production and trade. It’s ostensibly used to capture the informal sector. But how were informal sector participants avoiding VAT? The 2% was never debated & now the penalty is worse. Charged to consumers in retrospect
6/

MOF actually imagine they will collect USD$4.8bn in taxes. A staggering number, never achieved in Zim. In 2020, we shall be lucky to collect US$2bn. Almost half what it used to be in 2013. As a nation, as Parliament should we just fold our arms & pretend all is well?
7/Perhaps some good news first

Unlike the rest of the world that suffered greatly from covid, in Zim it helped matters somewhat. At zero growth economy, Zim imports close to USD$2bn in Petrol, Diesel, Electricity. The lockdown & slow economy meant Zim saved potentially US$1bn.
8/

This is easily explained by FCA accounts with US$1.1bn. Lockdown curtailed expenditure. It’s also a saving from the corruption and 100% taxes in the sector. Money stayed with the customers. & not middlemen.

Without fuel import taxes, GOZ went after the consumer!
9/

This cascades to transport, food, spares & many imports that we simply did not consume. It’s good news because what we saved on fuel imports we made up for it in food imports without pressure on the exchange rate.
** brimming
10/
The second most important positive is that oil prices slumped while other global commodities went up. Gold is up by 35% this year. As a major commodity exporter, this was an enviable position to be in.
11/
Unfortunately GOZ did not take advantage of this situation. It was a lost opportunity to press restart. Instead, it went & borrowed USD debt against commodities. $2.6bn in a year.

With a global $100trillion dollar shortage & EM risk this was the worst action.
12/
Then it went and fixed the exchange rate, at an overvalued rate for that matter. The black market rate has a 40% premium off the auction fixed rate. GOZ is punishing the Exporter and subsidizing the importer by 40%. Mind you, this absurdity in an Economic depression.
13/
By its actions GOZ is encouraging imports & punishing exports. Why would a functional rational government do this?

In the 1980’s corruption was firmly etched in imports & rations/import tokens. GOZ decided who could import. With imports of over $7bn, rent seeking is rife.
14/
An importer makes 40% on their stock on the dollar. Why would an importer stop importing? Never mind demand. It bodes well for the importer NOT to record sales but stock up. Check inventory of listed firms. Arbitrage is the game in town. Sponsored & encouraged by GOZ!
15.
Is it not curious. That GOZ policy since the 80’s has always favored importers? Whereas Rhodesian chose import substitution, GOZ favors importers.Remember the time Cottco was forced to export at a fixed rate of 824, yet the chemicals importers was given FX basically for free.
16/ Eddie Cross an Economist who sits on RBZ board writes lyrically of a promising 2021. Under his watch :
1. Negative real interest rates of 350%.
2. Private sector credit shrunk to US$400m from US$4bn
3. RBZ with US$5bn debt

Will Ed address his complicity in such absurdity?
17.
This is what Mthuli presented in 2018 budget. He increased without cause Zim gdp by 40% to US$25bn. Before revising it down to US$18bn. Just for fun check out the ambitious projections without any basis in reality .All I wish to show is that GOZ policy docs are best discarded
18/
GOZ destroyed the savings pool & capital formation 3X in the last 20yrs

1- Land reform
2- Hyperinflation
3- 1:1 gedye

In all 3 cases GOZ has buried its head in the sand & continues the wanton destruction of capital.

Remember :
Savings = Investment
19/
In all 3 cases the result is accumulation of more public debt. US$3.5bn to compensate white farmers is not addressing the capital formation problem. Only title deeds can finally bury the land issue.
20/
An average civil servant used to earn US$500 now takes home US$150. Yet their production has not depleted. A teacher & a nurse must still produce. This is how GOZ has stolen income & benefitted from Inflation tax. Incomes have been severely destroyed.
21/
Zim is in an Economic Depression. 8m of its citizens are in abject poverty, 60% informal traders. Those employed earn low incomes. Savings have been replaced by a debt trap. Low incomes mean low demand

In Economic theory. Zim is in a vicious cycle of poverty.
22/
While in 2021 the global recovery is 4%, for Zim it’s not as straight forward. Zim has structural impediments to growth. Eg it requires US$1.6bn for a good farming season, but the total private sector credit is only US$400m.

FDI was US$250m in 2019. Growth requires capital.
23/
While Covid period was low economic activity in the 8 months since March, Reserve money has increased by 53%. One of the world’s fastest.

In context, in Europe( where pundits are gravely concerned) M1 grew by 13.8% in a year.

What does 53% increase in Zim mean come 2021?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tinashe M

Tinashe M Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @baba_nyenyedzi

17 Nov
National Development strategy document reveals quite a lot. I will raise technical questions so the minister can answer. The Minister is a math whiz kid, yet a whole document is laden with arithmetic problems. Forget the 1000’s of words. Focus here
1. Treasury cannot change numbers randomly . The 2019 GDP according to Treasury was $18.5bn while the NDS has 2020 at $13.1bn using the official exchange rate. That’s a 30% decline in GDP. And not 4%.
2. The NDS assumes a population of 11.3m in 2020. This is less than the last census, & way less than the current 15/16m.

Most curious is the 58.8% jump in GNI per capita to 1842.2 from 1159.8 yet real GDP is supposed to rise by just 7%. Does it mean the population will half?
Read 8 tweets
19 Aug
1. Mthuli & George were technocrats meant to explain Economic & Public Finance principles to the politicians. No matter how unpalatable. I am still wondering if George believes what he was saying or this is a consequence of the political culture in Zim. A cost to truth telling
2. The lay person has heard the term inflation is a tax. In public finance this is very real. Granted most Economists chose not to take this elective, it is the most important in understanding government tax and fiscal policies.

Inflation is a form of taxation. I will explain
3. If an individual gets $1 in income, it’s theirs to spend. Tax at 25c means the individual has 75c to spend. But enjoy public goods. That’s the promise.

Government must live within 25c. But suppose government spends more than the 25c? They do so by borrowing from savers.
Read 10 tweets
22 Jul
1. The RBZ forex Auction . Whither from here?

The introduction of the auction started 4 wks ago at a rate of 57.3582. And it is now 72.147 to the dollar. This contrasts with the parallel market rate of 105 ( volumes rate). What do we learn about the process? Where are we going?
2. We must be clear that the Auction supply of currency is mostly the RBZ- which borrowed USD to feed the auction. The demand is mostly importers on the RBZ priority list. By this account the Auction is only one of the many markets prevailing. So far, it’s an importers market...
3. That those who have successfully bid at the Auction have in practice received USD is a good thing. A market is simply a buyer & seller exchanging value. Therefore Auction is a market.
Read 10 tweets
11 Jul
1. It’s absolutely gratifying when ordinary people are interested in Economics & more specifically money & banking. Most Economists shy away from explaining concepts because they too don’t really understand them. It’s easy to argue, much harder to explain concepts
2. It has made me realize that maybe before one argues a point they must explain the concept. So indeed we appreciate their conceptualisation and argument. Why else would a whole society be fixated with current a/c & forget capital a/c? Anyway, back to money ....
3. Before central banks & more specific the FED act of 1913. & introduction of income tax on 3 Oct 1913 ( I know this date because I was born on the 3rd of Oct) Banks could independently issue/print their own money & credit creation.
Read 9 tweets
27 Jun
Suppose it was correct that Ecocash was creating electronic money, ie The aggregate money in the Ecocash wallet was more than money held in the bank accounts, fueling the black market. Does the evidence support this conjecture?
The black market rates I’m told are Approx, RTGS 100, Ecocash 80, Bond 60. The strongest form of ZWL is Bond notes, then Ecocash and RTGS in the bank is the weakest. What are these prices signally in terms of supply of each in the market?
If we remember well in my essay, a price is just a signal it contains no virtue or moral signal. It’s not that black market dealers like bonds more than RTGS. But that the supply of Bond notes is limited compared to bank transfers. Ecocash remains as a surrogate of demand deposit
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
1. The Economic ignorance of GOZ.

Tis well to remember that I have been articulating over the last months with evidence that GOZ, Zanu PF are ignorant of basic economics and lack the common sense to carry out economic policy.
2. Many have ignored the message while others have attributed GOZ actions to malice and or evil genius. Malicious by way of destroying politicial opponents & ruthless attack on businesses that are seen as political rivals or whose economic success can be seen as political
3. The evil genius is the smart bureaucrats, PAC & political strategists- what Ketan Patel terms “ master strategist” who play four dimension chess and can see the ends years away (2030). So all these moves are calculated and part of a grand power play.,
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!