The Free Speech Union is disappointed to learn that Eton’s governing body has decided to uphold the decision to sack our member Will Knowland. No teacher should lose his or her job for challenging ideological orthodoxy, least of all a teacher at Eton. 1/11
This is a betrayal of the school’s 580-year history of encouraging its pupils to think critically and independently about difficult questions. 2/11
We will be referring Eton’s trustees to the Charity Commission and the Attorney General for failing to discharge their duty to protect Eton’s reputation and to ensure it is pursuing its charitable object, which is to advance education for the benefit of its students. 3/11
In addition, the Free Speech Union will be working with its supporters in the House of Commons to amend the Equality Act 2010. 4/11
We do not believe the legal advice given to Eton’s Head Master about the Equality Act, which he used to justify sacking Will Knowland for refusing to remove his video-lecture from his personal YouTube Channel, is correct. 5/11
The Act was never intended to prohibit teachers from introducing their students to a broad range of different perspectives on controversial topics, such as sex and gender. 6/11
Nevertheless, it was poorly drafted and can be exploited by enforcers of rigid, progressive orthodoxy to silence those who disagree with them. 7/11
We will be asking an MP who is in favour of free speech to bring forward a bill amending the Equality Act so it cannot be used in future as an excuse to censor dissent from left-wing dogma in schools, as it has been in this case. 8/11
It is important that all schoolchildren are introduced to a wide range of different viewpoints about controversial issues and encouraged to make up their own minds, not indoctrinated with the ‘correct’ opinion. 9/11
It is ironic that Eton has decided to name 12 scholarships after George Orwell, one of its former pupils, given the decision its governors have taken today. 1984 is a satire, not an instruction manual. 10/11
As Orwell said, “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” 11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/10 Toby Young, the General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, has made the following statement about the police's investigation of Dr David Starkey. The FSU is supporting Dr Starkey, who is a member, and has found him a criminal solicitor.
2/10 "The suggestion that Dr David Starkey may be guilty of stirring up racial hatred is absurd. The only person he stirred up hatred against is himself and he has paid a heavy price. He has also unreservedly apologised for his remarks.
3/10 As Lord Justice Sedley said when upholding the right of free speech in Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions (1999): 'Free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the...
1/ Four authors have resigned from JK Rowling's literary agency, saying, “Freedom of speech can only be upheld if the structural inequalities that hinder equal opportunities for underrepresented groups are challenged and changed.” Two problems with this principle. First, it's a
2/ rationale for trying to silence those who don't share your political ideology. Second, upholding free speech is a necessary condition for increasing opportunities for underrepresented groups. Without the protection of the First Amendment, the leaders of the American civil
3/ rights movement would not have been able to organise, march and protest. Trans activists, like all those fighting for the rights of underrepresented groups, should embrace free speech, not attack it.
1/ An alarming number of people are losing their jobs at the moment – or being suspended from them, pending investigations – because they've criticised some aspect of the Black Lives Matter movement.
2/ Grant Napear was fired by his radio station and resigned as the Sacramento Kings TV play-by-play announcer last week after he was mobbed for tweeting "All Lives Matter" nypost.com/2020/06/02/nba…
3/ Gordon Klein, a professor at UCLA, has been placed on leave after he refused to cancel a final exam following George Floyd's death washingtonexaminer.com/news/ucla-stud…
Last month, @GavinWilliamson gave UK universities a "final warning" – if they didn't take action to uphold free speech the govt would.
Tonight, Amber Rudd's invitation to speak at the UNWomen's Oxford Society was withdrawn at the behest of student activists – a clear breach of
@UniofOxford's own policy on free speech, as drafted by Timothy Garton Ash and Ken Macdonald, as well as the @EHRC's guidance on free speech at universities published last year, and could be a breach of Oxford's legal duty to uphold free speech under s43 of the Education (No 2)
Act 1986.
What's the point of putting these policies in place if universities aren't going to observe them?
This is the second major 'no-platforming' incident at Oxford in five days. The Free Speech Union lodged a formal complaint with the relevant authorities about the first
Professor Lee Jussim (@PsychRabble), who has agreed to be on the Advisory Council of the Free Speech Union, has written a Medium post drawing attention to an ongoing academic mobbing:
In this case, a group of academics who subscribe to trans orthodoxy have started a petition calling for the retraction of a peer-reviewed paper from an academic journal because it challenges that orthodoxy. The petition already has almost 1,000 signatures.
Please read Lee's
post and, if possible, write to the editors of the journal in question expressing your support for their decision to publish the paper – and your horror at the possibility it might be retracted for ideological reasons.
Once the FSU is up and running in the New Year we'll be