Privacy technology (such as Zcash) doesn't *just* protect Americans from their own government (in accordance with quintessentially American values such the Fourth Amendment). Perhaps more importantly, it protects Americans from *enemy governments*.
Listen to Chairman Powell. Liberty, and limitations on central power, is the way we do things here. It's what makes us different and better.
In fact, because of the way law, technology, information security, and industry interact, fully-transparent blockchains expose normal everyday American users to foreign military/espionage operations *much more* than they expose criminal users to law enforcement.
And conversely, because of the way blockchain technology and encryption technology actually work, encrypted blockchains like Zcash protect normal, law-abiding users from criminals and foreign enemies *much more* than they protect criminals from law enforcement.
Regulators and policy-makers — especially in the U.S.A. — have already come a long way in their understanding of these powerful new technologies and their implications, but they (and we all) still have a long way to go to understand their impacts.
I've been thinking of this — again — today because of the news that the Treasury department responsible for financial surveillance of Americans (and probably all other American government agencies!) have been hacked, probably by Vladimir Putin's spy agency.
There *is* a tension between American law enforcement and the American people. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution really *does* make their job harder sometimes.
But there is an outright conflict between Americans and foreign enemies, and in that conflict, technologies like blockchain and encryption are tools that served the interests of both the American people *and* their government.
This is a process we went through when deploying encryption for the Internet. For a few years, fearful, short-sighted officials tried to ban it, on law enforcement and national security grounds. A few years later they mandated it! On law enforcement and national security grounds.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What the fuck? Amazon is now doing "Virtual Book Burnings" to prevent people from reading dangerous ideas. This trend will further destabilize human society and make it harder to learn and harder to make peace with each other.
Amazon has now joined the Hall of Shame of the Monopoly Tech Overlords who are giving into the inevitable human desire to control other people's thoughts:
Low-carb researcher Amber O'Hearn studies evidence emerging from covid-19. People are asking "Can low-carb diet help?", but interestingly she instead argues that we can learn something from covid-19 — not just the standard low-carb theory. mostly-fat.com/mostly-fat/202…
Disclosure: I helped a little with the research and writing.
I think that a lot of people, during a time of crisis, when they feel scared, have a negative emotional response to someone questioning the dominant narrative — they get a feeling as though the questioner is backstabbing their society. I've seen a lot of this on twitter recently.
Here's a one small example. I don't mean to pick on this person and I don't want anyone else to pick on this person either, but I've seen a lot of tweets *like* this, where the person seems to feel moral anger against someone for putting forward a different narrative.
I believe the opposite: that dissent is part of the nervous system of society, and it is necessary for society to see, learn, and adapt. Silencing dissent is like paralyzing part of your brain.
Dec 31: Taiwan public health officials warn WHO of potential human-to-human transmission of the new coronavirus: amp.ft.com/content/2a70a0…. Taiwan mobilizes its national health emergency office.
Jan 14: WHO helps PRC's cover-up of the rapidly spreading pandemic by denying human-to-human transmission:
Jan 29: WHO (incl Bruce Aylward) lavishes praise on PRC’s belated but draconian response, saying that Xi Jinping "helped prevent the spread of the virus to other countries".
Curious what "Adjusted NVT Ratio" means? Then just click on... Hm... Hey @MessariCrypto, I don't see any way for people who follow this link (messari.io/screener/cyber…) to discover the definition of the terms.