Accounting prof and #GND cofounder @RichardJMurphy wrote an astounding thread over the weekend explaining where money comes from and what purpose taxation serves.



1/
He's since published an edited version under the title "Macroeconomics, money and post-Brexit recovery, all in one Twitter thread," saying it "took four hours and 40 years of thinking to write."

taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2020/12/1…

2/
It's a masterclass in the real world of money creation and taxation, beyond simplistic - and ahistorical - stories about money emerging from barter, followed by confiscation of our money by governments.

3/
The reality is obviously that money comes from government spending. That's how money gets into the economy, because only governments are allowed to create money, so all money starts with government spending.

4/
But what is money? Modern money - money over the past 50 years - is "just a promise to pay." When you borrow £1000 from the bank, you promise to pay it back. The bank opens a loan account and credits your savings account £1000 - a promise to give you that money on demand.

5/
"Two promises. Two accounts. And as a result we get new money. That is how all money is created. It is as simple as that. There is no one else’s money involved in this process. The bank does not lend out the money saved with them."

6/
"There are no notes and coin moved from one pile to another pile to back this all up either. There are just two promises. And then there is new money."

Money is a promise. It's easier for some people than others to get money is that their promises are more credible.

7/
If the government wants to borrow money, it can do so very cheaply because its promise to repay that money is very credible. They have their own bank, and they issue their own money. The government can always repay its debts.*

8/
(*Note we're talking about "monetarily sovereign" governments: governments that borrow in a free-floating currency that they themselves issue - not Venezuela, Zimbabwe, pre-crisis Argentina, or eurozone countries)

9/
When the bank loans you money, you make a promise to repay it. When you put money in the bank, it makes a promise to repay you. Governments - whose promises to repay are credible - back banks' promises through deposit insurance (a promise to create more money if needed).

10/
Murphy asks, why do we even need a government in this picture? Why can't we all just make promises to each other and issue IOUs? Because we need a backstop: an entity that creates currency and can always repay any debt.

11/
It's not just the government's ability to issue currency makes its promises better than everyone else's - it's also the ability to tax. Spending creates money, and taxing destroys it.

12/
Tax is not collected BEFORE the government spends. The government spends money into existence. It doesn't need to tax us before it can spend money. But taxing limits how much money circulates.

13/
If the government creates money without destroying it, eventually there will be too much money in circulation and prices will go up - inflation. Governments aren't households and they don't need balanced books.

14/
A balanced budget (in which the government taxes as much as it spends) leaves no money to circulate. If there's too much money in circulation - if there's an inflation problem - we might want that, but if governments net-remove money every year, the economy collapses.

15/
But how do you know how much money should be taken out or put into the economy? Right now, we control inflation by targeting a certain unemployment rate, AKA the NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment).

16/
The theory of the NAIRU is that if a certain percentage of your neighbors are unemployed, there's just enough money in circulation. If there was more, someone would offer them a job (and inflation would kick in). If there was less, there's be more people looking for work.

17/
The NAIRU is supposed to be the sweet spot, but for people whose unemployment is deliberately cultivated in order to prevent inflation, it's not sweet at all. These people must be miserable, scared and precarious or we all suffer from inflation.

18/
It's not just unemployed people: all precarious, low-paid work, all withholding of benefits like childcare and healthcare and retirement and eldercare are there in the name of fighting inflation.

19/
Murphy: "There has to be a better way to manage the value of money than this."

There is. A job guarantee: a job at a socially inclusive wage with good benefits - not paid for with taxes, but with new money creation (as with all government spending).

20/
The new money would then be taken out of circulation by taxing the people earning these good wages at the same rate as their non-jobs-guarantee peers. If this created inflation, we could raise taxes to reduce the money supply (not to pay for the program!).

21/
Finally, Murphy asks why governments bother to borrow at all? Why not just use spending and taxation to manage the economy. The answer is that government debt - bonds - aren't borrowing at all.

22/
They're a way for the government to offer a safe interest-bearing savings account for sums that exceed deposit insurance at your local bank. In the USA, the FDIC guarantees up to $250,000 per depositor. If you've got more than that in the bank when it fails, you're screwed.

23/
So if you're a pension fund or a corporation, you can buy treasury bonds and be guaranteed a small rate of return on them - but, more importantly, you can get the government's promise to pay you back, a promise backed by the ability to create money at will.

24/
It's an important point: not only would "eliminating government debt" take all the money out of circulation, it would also eliminate T-bills, the bedrock of all institutional savings.

25/
Murphy closes by explaining what this all means:

* Money comes from governments

* Banks wouldn't exist without the government's promises to pay

* Taxes don't fund government spending

* Taxation happens AFTER spending, not before

26/
* Governments spend their own money, not taxpayers' money

* Taxes control inflation, they don't fund programs

* Governments borrow because they choose to (in order to create a safe savings account), but they don't need to

27/
* Governments need not ever have debt crises; monetarily sovereign governments can always pay debts in the currencies they issue

* Governments set interest rates

* Interest rates don't control inflation - taxes do

* Full employment at fair wages pays for itself

28/
* There is no need for austerity

And finally: "By really understanding something as simple as how money is created - and by being aware that it is never in short supply as a result - we can rebuild from the mess that we are in. We can have the sustainable world we want."

29/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cory Doctorow #BLM

Cory Doctorow #BLM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doctorow

16 Dec
1998's Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act extended US copyrights by 20 years to life-plus-70 for human authors and 95 years total for corporate authors. The extension was retrospective, so works in the public domain went back into copyright.

1/ Image
This was a wanton act of violence that doomed much of our culture to disappear entirely before its copyright expired, allowing it to be used and revitalized, rewoven into our cultural fabric.

2/
It was undertaken to extract extra revenues for the minuscule fraction of works by long-dead authors that were still generating revenues. It also froze the US public domain for two decades, with no work re-entering our public domain until Jan 1 2018.

3/
Read 12 tweets
16 Dec
Cities - and even states - across the USA have passed laws banning the use of facial recognition technology by governments; the most-often cited concern is surveillance and its ability to chill lawful conduct like protests.

1/ Image
But as my @EFF colleague @mguariglia writes for @FutureTenseNow, the risks run deeper than that, as historic debates have shown us. The early 20th century saw debates over "rogues galleries" (police files of photos of criminals and suspects).

slate.com/technology/202…

2/
As Guariglia writes, "Suspicion is a circular process." In theory you got put into a Rogues Gallery because you were suspicious. In practice, being in a Rogues Gallery MADE YOU suspicious. A single photo taken after a single police encounter turned into an eternal accusation.

3/
Read 9 tweets
16 Dec
The Panama Papers, the Paradise Papers, Swissleaks, Lichtenstein Leaks, the Fincen Files - the past decade has been filled with financial secrecy scandals wherein we learned how the world's worst people hide the world's dirtiest money.

1/
Governments have fallen as a result of these leaks. Journalists have been murdered for reporting them, whistleblowers have been imprisoned for telling the truth. These are a high-stakes window on the corruption, self-dealing and viciousness of the 1% and their criminal pals.

2/
One critical revelation is the role that "onshort-offshore" plays in money-laundering: rich countries with a reputation for a strong rule of law and good governance are the lynchpin of global financial secrecy, thanks to lax corporate enforcement.

3/
Read 10 tweets
16 Dec
I'm about to go offline until 2021 and I had planned to do ABSOLUTELY NO WORK OF ANY SORT while on break, but I made an exception, for an exceptional opportunity: the 32nd Chaos Communications Congress, which is remote this year.

rc3.world

1/ Image
CCC is - notoriously - held during Christmas week, which means that the attendees are limited to people who either care about tech policy and security more than their families, or people who can talk their families into coming along.

2/
It's one of the best events I've ever attended (I brought my family along). My talk at that event, "The Coming War on General Purpose Computing," has had a long afterlife, in large part because of the kind and thoughtful reactions of the attendees.



3/
Read 6 tweets
16 Dec
It's been a decade since @apophenia introduced me to the idea of "email sabbaticals." That's when you go away and turn off your email.

zephoria.org/thoughts/archi…

1/ Image
Not just setting an out-of-office message, but rather deleting all inbound mail and asking correspondents to try again after the break. In her message, boyd explains to those correspondents who know how to reach her mother that this is the only way to reach her.

2/
Here's the rationale: if you allow email to pile up while you're trying to unwind, it'll take months to catch up on when you get back, and you'll immediately burn out, incinerating all the value you got out of your break.

3/
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!