I have this real, awful sinking feeling in my stomach around everything #Ballum related this Christmas. Not even a worry that they're going to break up, because I'll take that as a story, but that everything is going to be utterly pointless and out of character.
Ben's behaviour around Callum last week made ZERO sense and was a pointless scene if Ian didn't tell Ben about Callum. Ben suddenly nervous around Callum because he's a police officer after literally everything that's happened in the last three months? Sorry, what?
After Callum's literally covered for him before when he thought Ben had murdered someone? After Callum did all this stuff for the Mitchells recently, at his own risk, to the point where Ben was basically telling him about everything the Mitchells were doing?
If it truly was just Ben having guilty feels about Ian, or being scared of going back to prison, there is no reason for him to be shifty around Callum. In fact, that's even more reason for him actually speaking to Callum and asking for his help to cover himself.
If ben was avoiding Callum because of his guilt around Ian, why have Ben literally jump up and go visit Ian in order to not be in the same room as Callum? Why would he be ghosting Callum at all - even if it WAS Ian related, he'd need a reason to suddenly not trust him.
And why waste valuable screentime on sending Ben home and having that scene, when they could have just as easily had Ben doing the guilty feels at the hospital with his mum where he was the last time we saw him before that scene?
And again, why waste a scene when you're already cramming it in with Callum and Ian, when you could just as easily have Callum not wanting to report that it was Ian who grassed because he didn't want Ben to do something bad? Wasted scenes all over the place!
My only hope that I'm clinging to, naively, is that a flashback may be somewhat unreliable in terms of the order of things, or that there's some other twist up their sleeve, because if this doesn't all link together in some way, everything feels so pointless.
I know that character and...y'know...consistency take a backseat during Christmas in favour of ridiculous plots, but all this would be out of character AND such a waste of time in terms of filming and writing with such limited space?
IT MAKES NO SENSE.
And then to potentially start a whole other thread of the story with Stuart (I mean, we're pretty certain that 'hot water' thing is because he did something to DIDH, right?) without wrapping the dangling threads that lay forgotten in the ruins of Christmas?
I know nothing is disproved yet, but if we don't find out that Ian told Ben about Callum when he confronted him in The Vic that night, literally everything can go to hell because nothing makes sense anymore.
And I was one of the ones who actually kind of enjoyed the trauma of Callum lying to Ben and doing all this stuff purely to try and protect him. But it needs to come out soon, or all that wound up tension will be lost. We need to move forward. This isn't fun anymore.
Anyway, they need to hurry up and give Tony his wish of being 'Callum Mitchell' in the credits, and they can't do that unless they sort this first.
You're going to refuse that face? Seriously? You monsters.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You don't need to just stop using the word 'burden' when talking about accessibility and disabled people, but that you also need to change your entire mindset. If you don't say 'burden', but still think 'burden', you'll treat us just the same. And you won't do right by us.
Meeting access needs must be something that becomes second nature - for example, rather than building a ramp outside your restaurant being seen as additional extra or burden, view it in the same way you would view not installing an oven: unthinkable, of course you have one.
Building new buildings? Installing amps, lifts, wide enough corridors, quiet rooms etc. should be as automatic as installing a front door or putting a roof on the building. They're not add-ons, they're a vital and inherent necessity of the structure. It's a mindset change.
All discussions about reproductive rights and reproductive justice must include the voices of disabled people who are concerned about eugenics and how abortion plays into that.
These conversations aren't at war with being pro-choice, they're part of it.
There are very few disabled people who think the answer is to ban people from having abortions.
But we do need to have a discussion about pre-natal testing, how doctors frame disability to pregnant people, and the impact of societal ableism on decisions.
Only 2/3 babies with Downs are born each year in Iceland because of virulent testing and a culture that essentially encourages abortion if the test comes back positive. Many of the babies who ARE born are only born because their test was a false negative. cbsnews.com/news/down-synd…
The fact is that autistic people had moved on, and were talking about other things, more important things, but Sia suddenly replying to two-week-old tweets with the same arguments has led to another influx of fans attacking autistic people and us having to defend ourselves.
We didn't choose for this to come back up. But I'm not going to stand back and let fellow autistics be attacked by her stans because she decided to wanted to revisit her bad takes in the replies of tweets that are weeks old.
We don't want to be talking about this.
There are other things we need to be talking about.
Welcome to Walford, where cochlear implants fix ears, embalmers aren't used to seeing dead bodies, and rookie police officers question attempted murder suspects.
I'll never be over Stuart going 'I'm just the embalmer!' and then going 'OMG I couldn't put make up on the body, she was looking at me' in the same episode.
Do EE literally not know what embalmers do, or...?
You have to train for two years to become a licensed embalmer, just saying.
Honestly, I never even watched Game of Thrones, but I could happily read a thousands books analysing how quickly it just fucking vanished from the cultural zeitgeist after being such a fundamental part of it for a decade, because that shit is SO fascinating to me.
Like, there's 'fucking up the ending' and then there's 'systematically destroying something that was a fundamental part of contemporary popular culture to the point where it ceased to be in any way relevant to popular culture at all'.
I could watch years worth of video essays and read thousands and thousands of papers just exploring how it happened because it only ended a year and a bit ago but it's like GOT never existed in popular culture at all.
"Why are you only criticising liberals/leftists when the right are even nastier to disabled people?"
Because liberal/leftist spaces have a very specific brand of ableism that they hide behind a mask of progressivism and anti-capitalism.
And because the left should be better.
When you will throw disabled people under the bus in your environmental activism.
When you will side with workers who break the law and abandon disabled people at the side of the road.
I make a noise about it in leftist spaces because you are the ones who need to learn.
You don't consider us a part of your movement, when we are fundamentally entrenched in the very foundations of your ideology.
We are the ones who suffer under capitalism, we are the ones who will suffer in climate crises. You say you are progressive, yet you advocate eugenics.