You don't need to just stop using the word 'burden' when talking about accessibility and disabled people, but that you also need to change your entire mindset. If you don't say 'burden', but still think 'burden', you'll treat us just the same. And you won't do right by us.
Meeting access needs must be something that becomes second nature - for example, rather than building a ramp outside your restaurant being seen as additional extra or burden, view it in the same way you would view not installing an oven: unthinkable, of course you have one.
Building new buildings? Installing amps, lifts, wide enough corridors, quiet rooms etc. should be as automatic as installing a front door or putting a roof on the building. They're not add-ons, they're a vital and inherent necessity of the structure. It's a mindset change.
Don't just stop using the word 'burden' because disabled people shouted at you, actively take responsibility for shifting your own narrative and how you view these things: not as burdensome add-ons because you were told you had to, but an inherent part of your building/business.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
All discussions about reproductive rights and reproductive justice must include the voices of disabled people who are concerned about eugenics and how abortion plays into that.
These conversations aren't at war with being pro-choice, they're part of it.
There are very few disabled people who think the answer is to ban people from having abortions.
But we do need to have a discussion about pre-natal testing, how doctors frame disability to pregnant people, and the impact of societal ableism on decisions.
Only 2/3 babies with Downs are born each year in Iceland because of virulent testing and a culture that essentially encourages abortion if the test comes back positive. Many of the babies who ARE born are only born because their test was a false negative. cbsnews.com/news/down-synd…
I have this real, awful sinking feeling in my stomach around everything #Ballum related this Christmas. Not even a worry that they're going to break up, because I'll take that as a story, but that everything is going to be utterly pointless and out of character.
Ben's behaviour around Callum last week made ZERO sense and was a pointless scene if Ian didn't tell Ben about Callum. Ben suddenly nervous around Callum because he's a police officer after literally everything that's happened in the last three months? Sorry, what?
After Callum's literally covered for him before when he thought Ben had murdered someone? After Callum did all this stuff for the Mitchells recently, at his own risk, to the point where Ben was basically telling him about everything the Mitchells were doing?
The fact is that autistic people had moved on, and were talking about other things, more important things, but Sia suddenly replying to two-week-old tweets with the same arguments has led to another influx of fans attacking autistic people and us having to defend ourselves.
We didn't choose for this to come back up. But I'm not going to stand back and let fellow autistics be attacked by her stans because she decided to wanted to revisit her bad takes in the replies of tweets that are weeks old.
We don't want to be talking about this.
There are other things we need to be talking about.
Welcome to Walford, where cochlear implants fix ears, embalmers aren't used to seeing dead bodies, and rookie police officers question attempted murder suspects.
I'll never be over Stuart going 'I'm just the embalmer!' and then going 'OMG I couldn't put make up on the body, she was looking at me' in the same episode.
Do EE literally not know what embalmers do, or...?
You have to train for two years to become a licensed embalmer, just saying.
Honestly, I never even watched Game of Thrones, but I could happily read a thousands books analysing how quickly it just fucking vanished from the cultural zeitgeist after being such a fundamental part of it for a decade, because that shit is SO fascinating to me.
Like, there's 'fucking up the ending' and then there's 'systematically destroying something that was a fundamental part of contemporary popular culture to the point where it ceased to be in any way relevant to popular culture at all'.
I could watch years worth of video essays and read thousands and thousands of papers just exploring how it happened because it only ended a year and a bit ago but it's like GOT never existed in popular culture at all.
"Why are you only criticising liberals/leftists when the right are even nastier to disabled people?"
Because liberal/leftist spaces have a very specific brand of ableism that they hide behind a mask of progressivism and anti-capitalism.
And because the left should be better.
When you will throw disabled people under the bus in your environmental activism.
When you will side with workers who break the law and abandon disabled people at the side of the road.
I make a noise about it in leftist spaces because you are the ones who need to learn.
You don't consider us a part of your movement, when we are fundamentally entrenched in the very foundations of your ideology.
We are the ones who suffer under capitalism, we are the ones who will suffer in climate crises. You say you are progressive, yet you advocate eugenics.